Seoul School of Integrated Sciences & Technologies, 46 Ewhayeodae 2-gil, Fintower, Sinchon-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03767, Korea.
College of Business, Gachon University, 1342 Seongnamdaero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam 13120, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 3;19(1):500. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010500.
Innovation is now a feature of daily life. In a rapidly changing market environment and amid fierce competition, organizations pursue survival and growth through innovation, and the key driver of innovation is the creativity of employees. Because the value of creativity has been emphasized, many organizations are looking for effective ways to encourage employees to be creative at work. From a resource perspective, creativity at work can be viewed as a high-intensity job demand, and organizations should encourage it by providing and managing employee resources. This study is an attempt to empirically investigate how competence and abusive supervision affect the relationship between procedural justice and creativity from the conservation of resources perspective. Findings from two-wave time-lagged survey data from 377 South Korean employees indicate that procedural justice increases creativity through the mediation of competence. Furthermore, abusive supervision has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between procedural justice and competence. The findings show that competence moderates the relationship between procedural justice and creativity and that the lower the level of abusive supervision, the greater the effect of procedural justice on competence and creativity.
创新现在是日常生活的一个特征。在瞬息万变的市场环境和激烈的竞争中，组织通过创新寻求生存和发展，而创新的关键驱动力是员工的创造力。由于创造力的价值得到了强调，许多组织都在寻找有效的方法来鼓励员工在工作中发挥创造力。从资源的角度来看，工作中的创造力可以被视为一种高强度的工作要求，组织应该通过提供和管理员工资源来鼓励这种创造力。本研究试图从资源保存的角度，实证调查能力和滥用监督如何影响程序正义与创造力之间的关系。对来自韩国 377 名员工的两波时间滞后调查数据的研究结果表明，程序正义通过能力的中介作用提高了创造力。此外，滥用监督对程序正义和能力之间的关系具有负向调节作用。研究结果表明，能力调节了程序正义和创造力之间的关系，且滥用监督水平越低，程序正义对能力和创造力的影响越大。
