• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factors Associated with Online Hate Acceptance: A Cross-National Six-Country Study among Young Adults.与网络仇恨接受相关的因素:一项跨六国的青年成年人的跨国研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;19(1):534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010534.
2
Direct and indirect effects of social dominance orientation on hate speech perpetration via empathy and moral disengagement among adolescents: A multilevel mediation model.社会支配倾向通过同理心和道德脱离对青少年仇恨言论产生的直接和间接影响:多层次中介模型。
Aggress Behav. 2024 Jan;50(1):e22100. doi: 10.1002/ab.22100. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
Offline events and online hate.线下活动与网络仇恨
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0278511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278511. eCollection 2023.
4
Youth Exposure to Hate in the Online Space: An Exploratory Analysis.青少年在网络空间中接触仇恨内容:一项探索性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;17(22):8531. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228531.
5
Content Moderation on Social Media: Does It Matter Who and Why Moderates Hate Speech?社交媒体上的内容审核:谁来审核、为何审核仇恨言论很重要吗?
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 Jul;26(7):527-534. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0158. Epub 2023 May 3.
6
Features for Hate? Using the Delphi Method to Explore Digital Determinants for Online Hate Perpetration and Possibilities for Intervention.仇恨的特征?运用德尔菲法探索线上仇恨行为的数字决定因素和干预可能性。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 Jul;26(7):479-488. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0195. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
7
The Online Hate Speech Cycle of Violence: Moderating Effects of Moral Disengagement and Empathy in the Victim-to-Perpetrator Relationship.网络仇恨言论引发暴力循环:在受害者到加害者关系中道德脱离和同理心的调节作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Apr;25(4):223-229. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.0159. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
Empathy-based counterspeech can reduce racist hate speech in a social media field experiment.基于同理心的反驳言论可以减少社交媒体领域实验中的种族主义仇恨言论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116310118.
9
SEM analysis of agreement with regulating online hate speech: influences of victimization, social harm assessment, and regulatory effectiveness assessment.关于规范网络仇恨言论的一致性的SEM分析:受害经历、社会危害评估和监管有效性评估的影响
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 19;14:1276568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1276568. eCollection 2023.
10
Temperature impacts on hate speech online: evidence from 4 billion geolocated tweets from the USA.温度对网络仇恨言论的影响:来自美国 40 亿条地理位置标记推文的证据。
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Sep;6(9):e714-e725. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00173-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Citizen preferences for online hate speech regulation.公民对网络仇恨言论监管的偏好。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Feb 12;4(2):pgaf032. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf032. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Bias-Based Cyberaggression Related To Origin, Religion, Sexual Orientation, Gender, and Weight: Systematic Review of Young People's Experiences, Risk and Protective Factors, and the Consequences.基于偏见的网络攻击与起源、宗教、性取向、性别和体重有关:年轻人的经历、风险和保护因素以及后果的系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2025 Jan;26(1):86-102. doi: 10.1177/15248380241275971. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
3
SEM analysis of agreement with regulating online hate speech: influences of victimization, social harm assessment, and regulatory effectiveness assessment.关于规范网络仇恨言论的一致性的SEM分析:受害经历、社会危害评估和监管有效性评估的影响
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 19;14:1276568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1276568. eCollection 2023.
4
Effects of the Prevention Program "HateLess. Together against Hatred" on Adolescents' Empathy, Self-efficacy, and Countering Hate Speech.《“恨无界. 齐心反仇恨”预防项目对青少年同理心、自我效能感和反仇恨言论的影响》
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Jun;52(6):1115-1128. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01753-2. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
5
Exploring Cyberaggression and Mental Health Consequences among Adults: An Italian Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.探讨成年人中的网络攻击行为与心理健康后果:一项意大利全国范围的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 12;20(4):3224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043224.
6
Dating Violence among Undergraduate Medical Students at a Public University in Mexico City: An Exploratory Study.墨西哥城某公立大学医学生中的恋爱暴力:一项探索性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;20(4):3104. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043104.
7
Correlational study on cyberbullying and social abilities in intercultural teenagers.跨文化青少年网络欺凌与社交能力的相关性研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 29;13:848678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848678. eCollection 2022.
8
Victims of Cyberbullying: Feeling Loneliness and Depression among Youth and Adult Chileans during the Pandemic.网络欺凌受害者:疫情期间智利青年和成年人的孤独感和抑郁情绪。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 12;19(10):5886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105886.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial intelligence against hate: Intervention reducing verbal aggression in the social network environment.人工智能对抗仇恨:干预社交网络环境中的言语攻击
Aggress Behav. 2021 May;47(3):260-266. doi: 10.1002/ab.21948. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Youth Exposure to Hate in the Online Space: An Exploratory Analysis.青少年在网络空间中接触仇恨内容:一项探索性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;17(22):8531. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228531.
3
Associations between Witnessing and Perpetrating Online Hate in Eight Countries: The Buffering Effects of Problem-Focused Coping.八国在线仇恨见证与实施之间的关联:以问题为中心的应对方式的缓冲效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 18;16(20):3992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203992.
4
Associations between Bystanders and Perpetrators of Online Hate: The Moderating Role of Toxic Online Disinhibition.旁观者和网络仇恨行为者之间的关联:网络去抑制的毒性的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 17;15(9):2030. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092030.
5
Cyberbullying Among Adolescent Bystanders: Role of Affective Versus Cognitive Empathy in Increasing Prosocial Cyberbystander Behavior.青少年旁观者中的网络欺凌:情感共情与认知共情在增加亲社会网络旁观者行为中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 30;9:799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00799. eCollection 2018.
6
Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desensitization.接触仇恨言论会通过脱敏作用增加偏见。
Aggress Behav. 2018 Mar;44(2):136-146. doi: 10.1002/ab.21737. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
The role of short- and long-term cognitive empathy activation in preventing cyberbystander reinforcing cyberbullying behavior.短期和长期认知同理心激活在预防网络旁观者助长网络欺凌行为中的作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Apr;18(4):241-4. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0412. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
8
From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation.从始至终:一种实用的方法,解决普遍存在的内部一致性估计问题。
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):399-412. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Do economic equality and generalized trust inhibit academic dishonesty? Evidence from state-level search-engine queries.经济平等和普遍信任是否会抑制学术不端行为?来自州级搜索引擎查询的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Apr;23(4):339-45. doi: 10.1177/0956797611435980. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
10
Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes.沉浸于社交网络环境:脸书群组、使用与满足感以及社交结果。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Dec;12(6):729-33. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0003.

与网络仇恨接受相关的因素:一项跨六国的青年成年人的跨国研究。

Factors Associated with Online Hate Acceptance: A Cross-National Six-Country Study among Young Adults.

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.

Economic Sociology, Department of Social Research, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;19(1):534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010534.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19010534
PMID:35010794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8744966/
Abstract

The Internet, specifically social media, is among the most common settings where young people encounter hate speech. Understanding their attitudes toward the phenomenon is crucial for combatting it because acceptance of such content could contribute to furthering the spread of hate speech as well as ideology contamination. The present study, theoretically grounded in the General Aggression Model (GAM), investigates factors associated with online hate acceptance among young adults. We collected survey data from participants aged 18-26 from six countries: Finland ( = 483), France ( = 907), Poland ( = 738), Spain ( = 739), the United Kingdom ( = 959), and the United States ( = 1052). Results based on linear regression modeling showed that acceptance of online hate was strongly associated with acceptance of violence in all samples. In addition, participants who admitted to producing online hate reported higher levels of acceptance of it. Moreover, association with social dominance orientation was found in most of the samples. Other sample-specific significant factors included participants' experiences with the Internet and online hate, as well as empathy and institutional trust levels. Significant differences in online hate acceptance levels and the strength of its connections to individual factors were found between the countries. These results provide important insights into the phenomenon, demonstrating that online hate acceptance is part of a larger belief system and is influenced by cultural background, and, therefore, it cannot be analyzed or combatted in isolation from these factors.

摘要

互联网,特别是社交媒体,是年轻人最常遇到仇恨言论的地方之一。了解他们对这一现象的态度对于打击仇恨言论至关重要,因为接受这种内容可能会助长仇恨言论的传播和意识形态的污染。本研究以一般攻击模型(GAM)为理论基础,调查了与年轻人接受网络仇恨相关的因素。我们从六个国家的 18-26 岁参与者中收集了调查数据:芬兰(n=483)、法国(n=907)、波兰(n=738)、西班牙(n=739)、英国(n=959)和美国(n=1052)。基于线性回归建模的结果表明,在所有样本中,对网络仇恨的接受与对暴力的接受密切相关。此外,承认自己制造网络仇恨的参与者报告的接受程度更高。此外,在大多数样本中发现了与社会主导地位取向的关联。其他特定于样本的重要因素包括参与者的互联网和网络仇恨经历,以及同理心和机构信任水平。在不同国家之间,网络仇恨接受程度及其与个体因素的关联强度存在显著差异。这些结果提供了对这一现象的重要见解,表明网络仇恨接受是更大的信仰体系的一部分,并受到文化背景的影响,因此不能孤立于这些因素进行分析或打击。