Department of Industrial Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010595.
This study aimed to systematically compare three representative observational methods for assessing musculoskeletal loadings and their association with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs): Ovako Working Posture Analysis System (OWAS), Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). The comparison was based on a literature review without time limitations and was conducted on various factors related to observational methods. The comparisons showed that although it has a significant limitation of comprising only two classifications for the leg postures, (1) the RULA is the most frequently used method among the three techniques; (2) many studies adopted the RULA even in evaluation of unstable lower limb postures; (3) the RULA assessed postural loads as higher risk levels in most studies reviewed in this research; (4) the intra- and inter-reliabilities for the RULA were not low; and (5) the risk levels assessed by the RULA were more significantly associated with postural load criteria such as discomfort, MHTs and % capable at the trunk, and MSDs.
本研究旨在系统比较三种用于评估肌肉骨骼负荷的代表性观察方法及其与肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)的关系:Ovako 工作姿势分析系统(OWAS)、快速上肢评估(RULA)和快速全身评估(REBA)。该比较基于无时间限制的文献回顾,并针对与观察方法相关的各种因素进行了比较。比较结果表明,尽管 RULA 仅包含两种腿部姿势分类,存在显著局限性,但(1)RULA 是这三种技术中最常用的方法;(2)许多研究即使在评估不稳定的下肢姿势时也采用了 RULA;(3)在本研究回顾的大多数研究中,RULA 评估的姿势负荷为更高的风险水平;(4)RULA 的内部和内部可靠性不低;以及(5)RULA 评估的风险水平与姿势负荷标准(如不适、MHTs 和躯干的%能力)以及 MSDs 更显著相关。