• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会环境与健康投资行为:文化和制度对中国的共同影响。

Social Environment and Healthy Investment Behavior: Joint Influence of Culture and Institution on China.

机构信息

Business School, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010607.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19010607
PMID:35010861
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8744628/
Abstract

The influence of the social environment on healthy investment behavior is a vital research topic. This paper focuses on foreign direct investment (FDI) as an important part of its broad impact in improving the level of capital circulation and diversifying the non-systemic risk of a single country portfolio. Using data from 35 countries on direct investment in China, we find that the impact of the social environment on healthy investment behavior is mainly reflected in investors' resistance to cultural distance and their benefit compensation across institutional distance. In addition, their joint influence is still negative, dominated by cultural distance, which can still verify that institutional distance mitigates the negative effect of cultural distance on FDI. Therefore, in order to promote international healthy investment behavior, it is feasible to improve both the mitigation effect of the institution in the short term and promote the level of cultural exchange in the long term, according to the research results of this paper.

摘要

社会环境对健康投资行为的影响是一个重要的研究课题。本文以外国直接投资(FDI)为重点,研究其在提高资本流通水平和分散单一国家投资组合非系统性风险方面的广泛影响。本文利用来自 35 个国家在中国的直接投资数据,发现社会环境对健康投资行为的影响主要体现在投资者对文化距离的抵抗力和他们在制度距离方面的利益补偿上。此外,它们的共同影响仍然是负面的,主要受文化距离的影响,这仍然可以验证制度距离缓解了文化距离对外国直接投资的负面影响。因此,根据本文的研究结果,为了促进国际健康投资行为,在短期内提高制度的缓解效应,并在长期内促进文化交流水平,是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a639/8744628/5e0512e1275f/ijerph-19-00607-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a639/8744628/5e0512e1275f/ijerph-19-00607-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a639/8744628/5e0512e1275f/ijerph-19-00607-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Environment and Healthy Investment Behavior: Joint Influence of Culture and Institution on China.社会环境与健康投资行为:文化和制度对中国的共同影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010607.
2
The impact of foreign direct investment on sustainable development in China.外国直接投资对中国可持续发展的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(20):25625-25637. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08837-7. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Foreign direct investment, institutional development, and environmental externalities: evidence from China.外商直接投资、制度发展与环境外部性:来自中国的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2014 Mar 15;135:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
4
How do environmental regulation and foreign investment behavior affect green productivity growth in the industrial sector? An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data.环境规制与外商投资行为如何影响工业部门的绿色生产率增长?基于中国省级面板数据的实证检验。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 1;287:112282. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112282. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
Impact of China's outward foreign direct investment on green total factor productivity in "Belt and Road" participating countries: a perspective of institutional distance.“一带一路”参与国中国对外直接投资对绿色全要素生产率的影响:制度距离视角
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(4):4704-4715. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10849-2. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Influence of FDI characteristics on high-quality development of China's economy.FDI 特征对中国经济高质量发展的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(15):18977-18988. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09187-0. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Moderating role of institutional quality in validation of pollution haven hypothesis in BRICS: a new evidence by using DCCE approach.制度质量在金砖国家验证污染避难所假说中的调节作用:使用 DCCE 方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(6):9193-9202. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16087-4. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
8
Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulation on foreign direct investment: do environmental regulation affect FDI decisions?环境规制对外国直接投资的非一致性影响:环境规制是否影响 FDI 决策?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(4):5092-5104. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15277-4. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
9
The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Pollution in China: Corruption Matters.外国直接投资对中国环境污染的影响:腐败问题很重要。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 5;17(18):6477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186477.
10
A comparative study on the effect of alternative and fossil energy consumption on economic growth and foreign direct investment in selected countries using SUR approach.使用似不相关回归(SUR)方法对部分国家替代能源和化石能源消费对经济增长及外国直接投资的影响进行的比较研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(16):19799-19809. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11575-5. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the Heterogeneity Threshold Effect of Foreign Direct Investment and Corporate Social Responsibility on Haze Pollution.外资与企业社会责任对雾霾污染的异质性门槛效应研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;20(6):4802. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064802.

本文引用的文献

1
Do foreign direct investment and environmental regulation improve green technology innovation? An empirical analysis based on panel data from the Chinese manufacturing industry.外国直接投资和环境规制是否能提高绿色技术创新?基于中国制造业面板数据的实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(39):55302-55314. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14648-1. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
2
Cultural Distance and Firm Internationalization: A Meta-Analytical Review and Theoretical Implications.文化距离与企业国际化:一项元分析综述及理论启示
J Manage. 2018 Jan;44(1):89-130. doi: 10.1177/0149206317729027. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
3
Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China's cities? A spatial econometric perspective.
外商直接投资是否会影响中国城市的环境污染?基于空间计量经济学的视角。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 1;613-614:521-529. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.110. Epub 2017 Sep 26.