Urbanski Geoffrey, Gury Aline, Jeannin Pascale, Chevailler Alain, Lozac'h Pierre, Reynier Pascal, Lavigne Christian, Lacout Carole, Vinatier Emeline
Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital, 49000 Angers, France.
Mitolab, MitoVasc Institute, CNRS 6015, INSERM U1083, University of Angers, 49000 Angers, France.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 4;11(1):242. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010242.
Electrophoresis-derived techniques for anti-SSA/Ro60 KDa (anti-SSA) antibodies detection have been progressively replaced by methods using non-native antigens. We aimed to compare the patients' phenotypes and the occurrence of extraglandular manifestations in primary Sjögren's syndrome according to the method used to detect anti-SSA antibodies. Sera from patients with a diagnosis of pSS according to ACR/EULAR 2016 criteria between 2008 and 2017 were tested for anti-SSA antibodies using methods with non-native antigens (magnetic bead multiplex assay; line immunoassays) and one with native antigens (counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE)). The population was split into three groups according to anti-SSA antibodies status: absence (SSA-), presence in any method except for CIE (SSA+CIE-), and presence in CIE (SSA+CIE+). The patients in the SSA+CIE+ group ( = 70, 42.7%) were ten years younger and presented more immunological activity compared with both the SSA- ( = 80, 48.8%) and SSA+CIE- groups ( = 14, 8.5%). The SSA- and SSA+CIE- groups were poorly distinct. The presence of anti-SSA antibodies solely in CIE was significantly associated with the occurrence of extraglandular manifestations of pSS (HR = 4.45 (2.35-8.42)). Contrary to CIE, methods using non-native antigens to detect anti-SSA antibodies were unable to predict the occurrence of systemic expression of pSS.
用于检测抗SSA/Ro60 KDa(抗SSA)抗体的电泳衍生技术已逐渐被使用非天然抗原的方法所取代。我们旨在根据检测抗SSA抗体的方法,比较原发性干燥综合征患者的表型和腺外表现的发生率。对2008年至2017年间根据ACR/EULAR 2016标准诊断为原发性干燥综合征的患者血清,使用非天然抗原方法(磁珠多重检测法;线性免疫检测法)和一种天然抗原方法(对流免疫电泳(CIE))检测抗SSA抗体。根据抗SSA抗体状态将人群分为三组:阴性(SSA-)、除CIE外任何方法检测为阳性(SSA+CIE-)、CIE检测为阳性(SSA+CIE+)。与SSA-组(n = 80,48.8%)和SSA+CIE-组(n = 14,8.5%)相比,SSA+CIE+组的患者(n = 70,42.7%)年轻10岁,且免疫活性更高。SSA-组和SSA+CIE-组差异不明显。仅在CIE中检测到抗SSA抗体与原发性干燥综合征腺外表现的发生显著相关(HR = 4.45(2.35 - 8.42))。与CIE相反,使用非天然抗原检测抗SSA抗体的方法无法预测原发性干燥综合征全身表现的发生。