Suppr超能文献

[持续目标导向镇痛对大面积烧伤患者休克期液体复苏的影响]

[Effects of continuous goal-directed analgesia on fluid resuscitation of massive burn patients during shock].

作者信息

Han D W, Yang H N, Li Y C, Wei Y, Tian S M, Xia C D, Li X L

机构信息

Department of Burns, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450004, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 20;38(1):38-44. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211008-00347.

Abstract

To investigate the effects of continuous goal-directed analgesia on fluid resuscitation during shock stage in patients with massive burns, providing a basis for rational optimization of analgesia protocols in patients with burn shock. A retrospective case series study was conducted. One hundred and thirty-six patients with massive burns who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to Zhengzhou First People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2020, and the patients were divided into continuous analgesia (CA) group (68 cases,with average age of 44 years old) and intermittent analgesia (IA) group (68 cases,with average age of 45 years old) according to whether sufentanil injection was continuously used for intravenous analgesia during the shock stage. The patients in the 2 groups were predominantly male. Before and at 72 h of treatment, the severity of disease and trauma pain of patients in the 2 groups were scored by the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Hematocrit, heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), oxygen saturation in central venous blood (ScvO), rehydration coefficient, blood lactate value, hourly urine output, and the adverse reactions such as hypotension, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, skeletal muscle tonicity, respiratory depression, bradycardia, pruritus, and drug addiction of patients in the 2 groups during the treatment were recorded at the 1, 2, and 3 24 h post-injury. Data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, paired or independent sample test, Bonferroni correction,chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test. Before treatment, APACHE Ⅱ and VAS scores of patients in the 2 groups were close (with values of -0.67 and 0.32, respectively, >0.05); At 72 h of treatment, APACHE Ⅱ and VAS scores of patients in CA group were 8.5±2.2 and 2.5±1.6, both of which were significantly lower than (15.2±3.0) and (7.9±2.0) of patients in IA group, respectively (with values of -14.94 and -17.46, respectively, <0.01). Compared with the pre-treatment period, the APACHE Ⅱ and VAS scores of patients in IA group decreased significantly at 72 h of treatment (with values of 11.35 and 30.59, respectively, <0.01); the changes in APACHE Ⅱ and VAS scores of patients at 72 h of treatment in comparison with those of patients before treatment in CA group were all similar to those of patients in IA group (with values of 4.00 and 4.82, respectively, <0.01). Compared with those of patients in IA group, there were no significant changes in CVP, hematocrit, heart rate, ScvO, and MAP of patients in CA group at all three 24 h post-injury (with values of <0.01, 0.12, 2.10, 1.55, 0.03; 0.13, 0.22, <0.01, 0.17, 0.49; 0.63, 0.06, 0.04, 2.79, and 2.33, respectively, >0.05). Compared with those of patients in IA group at the 1 24 h post-injury, CVP, ScvO and MAP of patients were significantly higher at the 2 and 3 24 h post-injury (with values of -10.10, -9.31, -8.89; -10.81, -4.65, and -9.43, respectively, <0.01), and the heart rate of patients was significantly lower at the 2 and 3 24 h post-injury (with values of 7.53 and 7.78, respectively, <0.01), and the hematocrit of patients decreased significantly only at the 3 24 h post-injury (=15.55, <0.01); the changes of CVP, ScvO, MAP and heart rate of patients at the 2 and the 3 24 h post-injury, and HCT of patients at the 3 24 h post-injury, in comparison with those of patients at the 1 24 h post-injury in CA group were similar to those of patients in IA group (with values of -12.25, -10.24, -8.99, 9.42, -8.83, -7.53, -11.57, 10.44, and 12.91, respectively, <0.01). Compared with those of patients in IA group, the rehydration coefficient of patients in CA group was significantly higher only at the 3 24 h post-injury (=5.60, <0.05), blood lactate value of patients in CA group was significantly lower at the 1 and 2 24 h post-injury (with values of 4.32 and 14.52, respectively, <0.05 or <0.01), the hourly urine output of patients in CA group increased significantly at the 1, 2, and 3 24 h post-injury (with values of 24.65, 13.12, and 5.63, respectively, <0.05 or <0.01). Compared with the those of patients at the 1 24 h post-injury, the rehydration coefficient of patients in IA group decreased significantly at the 2 and the 3 24 h post-injury (with values of 33.98 and 36.91, respectively, <0.01), the blood lactate values of patients in IA group decreased significantly at the 2 and the 3 24 h post-injury (with values of 8.20 and 11.68, respectively, <0.01), and the hourly urine output of patients in IA group was significantly increased at the 2 and the 3 24 h post-injury (with values of -3.52 and -5.92, respectively, <0.01); the changes of rehydration coefficients and blood lactate values of patients at the 2 and the 3 24 h post-injury in comparison with those of patients at the 1 24 h post-injury in CA group were similar to those of patients in IA group (with values of 35.64, 33.64, 9.86, and 12.56, respectively, <0.01), but hourly urine output of patients in CA group increased significantly only at the 3 24 h compared with that of patients at the 1 24 h post-injury (=-3.07, <0.01). Adverse reactions such as hypotension, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, bradycardia, and pruritus occurred rarely in patients of the 2 groups, and none of the patients had skeletal muscle tonicity, respiratory depression, or drug addiction. The incidence of adverse reactions of patients in CA group was similar to that in IA group (=0.08, >0.05). Continuous goal-directed analgesia can effectively relieve pain and improve vital signs of patients with large burns. Meanwhile it has little impact on volume load, which can assist in correcting ischemia and hypoxia during the shock period and help patients get through the shock period smoothly.

摘要

探讨持续目标导向镇痛对大面积烧伤患者休克期液体复苏的影响,为烧伤休克患者镇痛方案的合理优化提供依据。进行回顾性病例系列研究。2015年1月至2020年12月,郑州第一人民医院收治符合纳入标准的136例大面积烧伤患者,根据休克期是否持续使用舒芬太尼注射液静脉镇痛,将患者分为持续镇痛(CA)组(68例,平均年龄44岁)和间断镇痛(IA)组(68例,平均年龄45岁)。两组患者以男性为主。治疗前及治疗72 h时,采用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)和视觉模拟评分法(VAS)对两组患者的病情严重程度和创伤疼痛进行评分。记录两组患者伤后1、2、3个24 h时的血细胞比容、心率、平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP)、中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO)、补液系数、血乳酸值、每小时尿量,以及低血压、恶心、呕吐、头晕、骨骼肌张力、呼吸抑制、心动过缓、瘙痒、药物成瘾等不良反应。采用重复测量方差分析、配对或独立样本t检验、Bonferroni校正、卡方检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析。治疗前,两组患者APACHEⅡ和VAS评分相近(分别为-0.67和0.32,P>0.05);治疗72 h时,CA组患者APACHEⅡ和VAS评分分别为8.5±2.2和2.5±1.6,均显著低于IA组的(15.2±3.0)和(7.9±2.0)(分别为-14.94和-17.46,P<0.01)。与治疗前相比,IA组患者治疗72 h时APACHEⅡ和VAS评分显著降低(分别为11.35和30.59,P<0.01);CA组患者治疗72 h时APACHEⅡ和VAS评分与治疗前相比的变化情况与IA组患者相似(分别为4.00和4.82,P<0.01)。与IA组患者相比,CA组患者伤后三个24 h时CVP、血细胞比容、心率、ScvO和MAP均无显著变化(分别为P<0.01、0.12、2.10、1.55、0.03;0.13、0.22、P<0.01、0.17、0.49;0.63、0.06、0.04、2.79和2.33,P>0.05)。与IA组患者伤后1个24 h时相比,CA组患者伤后2、3个24 h时CVP、ScvO和MAP显著升高(分别为-10.10、-9.31、-8.89;-10.81、-4.65和-9.43,P<0.01),伤后2、3个24 h时心率显著降低(分别为7.53和7.78,P<0.01),仅伤后3个24 h时血细胞比容显著降低(P=15.55,P<0.01);CA组患者伤后2、3个24 h时CVP、ScvO、MAP和心率的变化情况,以及伤后3个24 h时血细胞比容与伤后1个24 h时相比与IA组患者相似(分别为-12.25、-10.24、-8.99、9.42、-8.83、-7.53、-11.57、10.44和12.91,P<0.01)。与IA组患者相比,CA组患者仅伤后3个24 h时补液系数显著升高(P=5.60,P<0.05),伤后1、2个24 h时血乳酸值显著降低(分别为4.32和14.52,P<0.05或P<0.01),伤后1、2、3个24 h时每小时尿量均显著增加(分别为24.65、13.12和5.63,P<0.05或P<0.01)。与伤后1个24 h时相比,IA组患者伤后2、3个24 h时补液系数显著降低(分别为33.98和36.91,P<0.01),伤后2、3个24 h时血乳酸值显著降低(分别为8.20和11.68,P<0.01),伤后2、3个24 h时每小时尿量显著增加(分别为-3.52和-5.92,P<0.01);CA组患者伤后2、3个24 h时补液系数和血乳酸值与伤后作比的变化情况与IA组患者相似(分别为35.64、33.64、9.86和12.56,P<0.01),但CA组患者仅伤后3个24 h时每小时尿量与伤后1个24 h时相比显著增加(P=-3.07,P<0.01)。两组患者均很少发生低血压、恶心、呕吐、头晕、心动过缓、瘙痒等不良反应,无一例患者出现骨骼肌张力、呼吸抑制或药物成瘾。CA组患者不良反应发生率与IA组相似(P=0.08,P>0.05)。持续目标导向镇痛可有效缓解大面积烧伤患者疼痛,改善生命体征。同时对容量负荷影响小,可辅助纠正休克期缺血缺氧,帮助患者平稳度过休克期。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Analgesia protocols for burns dressings: Challenges with implementation.烧伤敷料的镇痛方案:实施中的挑战。
Burns. 2019 Nov;45(7):1680-1684. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
4
Principles of Burn Pain Management.烧伤疼痛管理原则
Clin Plast Surg. 2017 Oct;44(4):737-747. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
9
Management of pain in children with burns.烧伤儿童的疼痛管理。
Int J Pediatr. 2010;2010. doi: 10.1155/2010/825657. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验