• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于倾向评分匹配的机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助根治性右半结肠切除术对短期结局和长期预后的影响

[The effects of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy on short-term outcome and long-term prognosis based on propensity score matching].

作者信息

Zhang X Q, Cao S G, Liu X D, Li Z Q, Tian Y L, Xu J F, Meng C, Li Y, Tan X J, Liu S L, Guo D, Jiao X L, Li Y, Chen D, Lyu L, Zhang J, Jiang H T, Niu Z J, Zhou Y B

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 1;60(2):148-153. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210524-00221.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210524-00221
PMID:35012274
Abstract

To compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the right colon. Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database identified 288 right colon cancer patients who underwent either robotic-assisted (=57) or laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy (=231) between October 2014 and October 2020 at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. There were 161 males and 127 females, aging (60.3±12.8) years (range: 17 to 86 years). After propensity score matching as 1∶4 between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy, there were 56 cases in robotic group and 176 cases in laparoscipic group. Perioperative outcomes and overall survival were compared between the two groups using test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, χ test, Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test, respectively. The total operative time was similar between the robotic and laparoscopic group ((206.9±60.7) minutes (219.9±56.3) minutes, =-1.477, =0.141). Intraoperative bleeding was less in the robotic group (50 (20) ml 50 (50) ml, =-4.591, <0.01), while the number of lymph nodes retrieved was significantly higher (36.0±10.0 29.0±10.1, =4.491, <0.01). Patients in robotic group experienced significantly shorter hospital stay, shorter time to first flatus, and defecation (: -2.888, -2.946, -2.328, all <0.05). Moreover, the overall peri-operative complication rate was similar between robotic and laparoscopic group (17.9% 22.7%, χ²=0.596,=0.465). The 3-year overall survival were 92.9% and 87.9% respectively and the 3-year disease-free survival rates were 83.1% and 82.6% with no statistical significance between the robotic and laparoscopic group (>0.05). Compared to laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy, robot-assisted right hemicolectomy could improve some short-term clinical outcomes. The two procedures are both achieving comparable survival.

摘要

比较机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助根治性右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌患者的短期和长期疗效。对前瞻性收集的数据库进行回顾性分析,纳入了2014年10月至2020年10月在青岛大学附属医院胃肠外科接受机器人辅助(n = 57)或腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术(n = 231)的288例右半结肠癌患者。其中男性161例,女性127例,年龄(60.3±12.8)岁(范围:17至86岁)。在按照1∶4的倾向评分匹配机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术后,机器人组有56例,腹腔镜组有176例。分别采用t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验、χ²检验、Fisher确切概率法、Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验比较两组的围手术期结局和总生存期。机器人组和腹腔镜组的总手术时间相似((206.9±60.7)分钟 vs (219.9±56.3)分钟,t = -1.477,P = 0.141)。机器人组术中出血量较少(50(20)ml vs 50(50)ml,t = -4.591,P < 0.01),而清扫的淋巴结数量显著更多(36.0±10.0 vs 29.0±10.1,t = 4.491,P < 0.01)。机器人组患者的住院时间显著缩短,首次排气时间和排便时间也显著缩短(t值分别为:-2.888、-2.946、-2.328,均P < 0.05)。此外,机器人组和腹腔镜组的总体围手术期并发症发生率相似(17.9% vs 22.7%,χ² = 0.596,P = 0.465)。机器人组和腹腔镜组的3年总生存率分别为92.9%和87.9%,3年无病生存率分别为83.1%和82.6%,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术相比,机器人辅助右半结肠切除术可改善一些短期临床结局。两种手术方式的生存效果相当。

相似文献

1
[The effects of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy on short-term outcome and long-term prognosis based on propensity score matching].基于倾向评分匹配的机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助根治性右半结肠切除术对短期结局和长期预后的影响
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 1;60(2):148-153. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210524-00221.
2
[Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].基于倾向评分匹配的机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌根治术临床疗效的比较研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 1;57(6):447-451. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.06.010.
3
Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术的短期和长期疗效:倾向评分匹配回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2022 Sep;105:106855. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106855. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
4
[Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].[机器人手术与腹腔镜辅助手术对食管胃交界部Siewert II型腺癌患者淋巴结清扫及短期预后的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):156-163.
5
[Comparison of short-term efficacy between robotic and 3D laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].机器人与3D腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治性远端胃切除术的短期疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):350-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200224-00085.
6
Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic approaches for right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜右半结肠癌手术的长期肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec;27(12):1183-1189. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02857-4. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
7
Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison.机器人或三维(3D)腹腔镜用于完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)和腔内吻合的右半结肠切除术?倾向评分匹配研究比较。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2039-2048. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07600-w. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
Short- and long-term outcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: A retrospective study.全机器人与机器人辅助右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的短期和长期结果:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(13):e15028. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015028.
9
[Comparison of clinical efficacy between bursa omentalis approach and medial-to-lateral approach in laparoscopic left hemicolectomy: a propensity score matching analysis].腹腔镜左半结肠切除术中网膜囊入路与由内向外入路的临床疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 25;24(10):897-903. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200715-00420.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision: a retrospective multicenter study with propensity score matching.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下完整结肠系膜切除术的右半结肠切除术:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性多中心研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 2;13:1187476. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1187476. eCollection 2023.