Suppr超能文献

机器人或三维(3D)腹腔镜用于完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)和腔内吻合的右半结肠切除术?倾向评分匹配研究比较。

Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison.

机构信息

General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone, 1, 06034, Foligno, PG, Italy.

General Surgery, ASL Toscana Sud-Est, San Donato" Hospital, Via Pietro Nenni, 1, 52100, Arezzo, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2039-2048. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07600-w. Epub 2020 May 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We describe our preliminary experience in complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) and intracorporeal anastomosis for right colon cancer, comparing the robotic and the three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational clinical cohort study on patients who underwent radical curative surgical resection of right colon cancer with CME from January 2014 to June 2019. Propensity scores were calculated by bivariate logistic regression, including the following variables: age, BMI, and size of tumor.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients underwent CME with CVL: 26 by means of robot-assisted surgery and 29 by means of 3D laparoscopic procedure. There were not statistically significant differences about all the intra- and postoperative outcomes (operative time, length of the specimen, time to bowel canalization, time to soft oral intake, length of hospital stay, postoperative complication, number of retrieved lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes and lymph node ratio) between the robotic and the 3D laparoscopic approach. After the matching procedure, 20 patients of the robotic group and 20 patients of the 3D laparoscopic group were selected for the analysis. There were no differences in any of the analyzed variables between the two groups except for longer operative time in the robotic group (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The 3D vision revealed an important advantage in order to achieve the correct identification of surgical anatomy allowing a safe and effective right colectomy with CME, CVL, and intracorporeal anastomosis, either using laparoscopic or with robotic approach, providing similar short-term outcomes. Taking into account the high costs and the longer operative time of robotic procedure, the 3D laparoscopy could be considered in performing right colectomy with CME, while the robotic approach should be considered as a first choice approach for challenging situations (obese patient, complex associated procedures).

摘要

背景

我们描述了在右半结肠癌中实施完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)并联合中央血管结扎(CVL)和腔内吻合的初步经验,比较了机器人手术与三维(3D)腹腔镜手术的效果。

方法

我们对 2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月接受 CME 根治性右半结肠癌切除术的患者进行了回顾性观察性临床队列研究。通过二元逻辑回归计算倾向评分,包括以下变量:年龄、BMI 和肿瘤大小。

结果

55 例患者接受了 CME 并联合 CVL:26 例采用机器人辅助手术,29 例采用 3D 腹腔镜手术。两组患者的所有术中及术后结果(手术时间、标本长度、肠道通畅时间、软食开始时间、住院时间、术后并发症、淋巴结检出数量、阳性淋巴结数量和淋巴结比率)均无统计学差异。在匹配程序后,机器人组和 3D 腹腔镜组各选择 20 例患者进行分析。两组在任何分析变量上均无差异,除机器人组的手术时间较长(p=0.002)外。

结论

3D 视觉在识别手术解剖结构方面具有重要优势,允许安全有效地进行右半结肠切除术,无论是采用腹腔镜还是机器人手术,均采用 CME、CVL 和腔内吻合,提供相似的短期效果。考虑到机器人手术的高成本和较长的手术时间,3D 腹腔镜可用于进行 CME 右半结肠切除术,而机器人手术应作为复杂情况(肥胖患者、复杂相关手术)的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验