Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 11;23(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00741-8.
One of the next frontiers in HIV research is focused on finding a cure. A new priority includes people with HIV (PWH) with non-AIDS terminal illnesses who are willing to donate their bodies at the end-of-life (EOL) to advance the search towards an HIV cure. We endeavored to understand perceptions of this research and to identify ethical and practical considerations relevant to implementing it.
We conducted 20 in-depth interviews and 3 virtual focus groups among four types of key stakeholders in the United States (PWH, biomedical HIV cure researchers, HIV clinicians, and bioethicists) to obtain triangulated viewpoints because little was known about the ethics of this topic. Each group was queried as to ethical considerations, safeguards, and protections for conducting HIV cure-related research at the EOL to ensure this research remains acceptable.
All four key stakeholder groups generally supported HIV cure-related research conducted at the EOL because of the history of altruism within the PWH community and the potential for substantial scientific knowledge to be gained. Our informants expressed that: (1) Strong stakeholder and community involvement are integral to the ethical and effective implementation, as well as the social acceptability of this research; (2) PWH approaching the EOL should not inherently be considered a vulnerable class and their autonomy must be respected when choosing to participate in HIV cure-related research at the EOL; (3) Greater diversity among study participants, as well as multi-disciplinary research teams, is necessitated by HIV cure-related research at the EOL; (4) The sensitive nature of this research warrants robust oversight to ensure a favorable risk/benefit balance and to minimize the possibility of therapeutic misconception or undue influence; and (5) Research protocols should remain flexible to accommodate participants' comfort and needs at the EOL.
Because of the ethical issues presented by HIV cure-related research at the EOL, robust ethical safeguards are of utmost importance. The proposed ethical and practical considerations presented herein is a first step in determining the best way to maximize this research's impact and social value. More much inquiry will need to be directed towards understanding context-specific and cultural considerations for implementing EOL HIV cure research in diverse settings.
HIV 研究的下一个前沿领域之一是寻找治愈方法。一个新的优先事项包括愿意在生命末期(EOL)捐献遗体以推进 HIV 治愈研究的患有非艾滋病终末期疾病的 HIV 感染者(PWH)。我们努力了解人们对这项研究的看法,并确定与实施这项研究相关的伦理和实际考虑因素。
我们在美国的四类主要利益相关者(PWH、生物医学 HIV 治愈研究人员、HIV 临床医生和生物伦理学家)中进行了 20 次深入访谈和 3 次虚拟焦点小组,以获得三角观点,因为对这个主题的伦理知之甚少。每个小组都被问到在 EOL 进行 HIV 治愈相关研究的伦理考虑、保障措施和保护措施,以确保这项研究仍然可以接受。
所有四个主要利益相关者群体普遍支持在 EOL 进行 HIV 治愈相关研究,因为 PWH 社区内存在利他主义的历史,并且有可能获得大量的科学知识。我们的信息提供者表示:(1)强有力的利益相关者和社区参与是这项研究的伦理和有效实施以及社会可接受性的基础;(2)接近 EOL 的 PWH 不应被视为弱势群体,他们在选择参与 EOL 与 HIV 治愈相关的研究时,其自主权必须得到尊重;(3)EOL 与 HIV 治愈相关的研究需要更多的研究参与者和多学科研究团队的多样性;(4)这项研究的敏感性要求进行强有力的监督,以确保风险/收益平衡有利,并最大限度地减少治疗误解或不当影响的可能性;(5)研究方案应保持灵活,以适应参与者在 EOL 的舒适和需求。
由于 EOL 与 HIV 治愈相关的研究提出了伦理问题,因此强有力的伦理保障至关重要。本文提出的伦理和实际考虑因素是确定最大限度地发挥这项研究的影响和社会价值的最佳方法的第一步。需要进一步探讨在不同环境中实施 EOL HIV 治愈研究的具体情况和文化考虑因素。