Causes of Injury and Litigation in Cutaneous Laser Surgery: An Update From 2012 to 2020.

OBJECTIVE

To identify common causes of injury and liability claims related to cutaneous laser surgery from 2012 to 2020.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Search of online national legal database of public legal documents regarding cutaneous laser surgery litigation.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2020, 69 cases of liability claims due to a cutaneous laser surgery device were identified. Of these, 49 (71%) involved a nonphysician operator (NPO); 12 incidents (17%) involved non-core physician operators performing the procedure; 6 cases (9%) involved a plastic surgeon operator; and 2 cases (3%) involved a dermatologist operator. Laser hair removal was most litigated (44 cases, 64%), followed by laser skin rejuvenation (20 cases, 30%). Thirty-six of 69 cases had a discernible outcome, 53% (n = 19) rendered judgements in favor of the plaintiff, with a mean indemnity payment of $320,975 (range, $1,665-$1.5 million).

CONCLUSION

Previous work evaluating trends in laser surgery litigation from 1985 to 2012 identified increasing injury and legal action when performed by NPOs. Data from this study are consistent with these previous findings. Both studies demonstrate that NPOs account for most cases of legal action with an increasing proportion of cases being performed by NPOs. In this study, unsupervised NPOs comprise nearly three-quarters of laser surgery lawsuits, but the data may underestimate the frequency of injury and litigation caused by unsupervised NPOs.