Coyle Kensington, Kesty Katarina R
St. Petersburg Skin and Laser, Florida, USA.
Kesty AI, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Jun;24(6):e70235. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70235.
The use of laser treatments for cosmetic and medical dermatologic conditions has increased significantly, yet provider training varies widely, raising concerns about patient safety and treatment efficacy. This study examines the availability and practice patterns of fellowship-trained laser dermatologists and compares them to medical spas and plastic surgeons offering laser services.
In September 2024, an online search and telephone survey were conducted to identify board-certified dermatologists who completed an American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) Cosmetics and Lasers Fellowship. Data on consultation availability, pricing, provider involvement, technology investment, and treatment customization were collected from dermatology, plastic surgery, and medical spa practices.
A total of 124 fellowship-trained dermatologists were identified. Compared to medical spas and plastic surgeons, these dermatologists had longer wait times for consultations (23 vs. 4 and 11 days), higher consultation fees ($153 vs. $30 and $78), and a greater number of laser devices per practice. Physician involvement in laser procedures was significantly higher among dermatologists (60%) compared to plastic surgeons (33%) and medical spas (9%). Medical spas relied heavily on nonphysician providers (26%) and laser technicians (56%), with only 41% providing direct on-site supervision. The majority (98%) of dermatologists and plastic surgeons customized laser treatments, compared to 63% of medical spas. Dermatologists dedicated more clinical time to laser procedures, with 19% spending over 50% of their practice on lasers, compared to none at medical spas and plastic surgery offices.
Fellowship-trained laser dermatologists provide more direct physician involvement, greater technological resources, and highly customized treatments compared to medical spas and plastic surgeons. While medical spas offer lower costs and shorter wait times, the lack of physician oversight and limited training among providers may represent substandard care. These findings highlight the importance of provider qualifications in ensuring optimal patient outcomes and underscore the value of specialized laser training in dermatology.
激光治疗在美容和医学皮肤病领域的应用显著增加,但医疗服务提供者的培训差异很大,这引发了对患者安全和治疗效果的担忧。本研究调查了接受过专科培训的激光皮肤科医生的可及性和执业模式,并将他们与提供激光服务的医疗美容机构和整形外科医生进行比较。
2024年9月,通过在线搜索和电话调查,确定完成美国皮肤外科学会(ASDS)美容与激光专科培训的委员会认证皮肤科医生。收集了皮肤科、整形外科和医疗美容机构在会诊可及性、定价、医疗服务提供者参与情况、技术投资和治疗定制方面的数据。
共识别出124名接受过专科培训的皮肤科医生。与医疗美容机构和整形外科医生相比,这些皮肤科医生的会诊等待时间更长(23天,而医疗美容机构为4天,整形外科医生为11天),会诊费用更高(153美元,而医疗美容机构为30美元,整形外科医生为78美元),且每家机构的激光设备数量更多。皮肤科医生在激光手术中的医生参与度显著高于整形外科医生(33%)和医疗美容机构(9%)(分别为60%)。医疗美容机构严重依赖非医生医疗服务提供者(26%)和激光技术人员(56%),只有41%提供直接现场监督。大多数(98%)皮肤科医生和整形外科医生会定制激光治疗,而医疗美容机构的这一比例为63%。皮肤科医生在激光手术上投入的临床时间更多,19%的皮肤科医生将其执业时间的50%以上用于激光治疗,而医疗美容机构和整形外科诊所则无人如此。
与医疗美容机构和整形外科医生相比,接受过专科培训的激光皮肤科医生能提供更多医生直接参与、更多技术资源和高度定制化的治疗。虽然医疗美容机构成本更低、等待时间更短,但缺乏医生监督以及医疗服务提供者培训有限可能意味着护理水平不达标准。这些发现凸显了医疗服务提供者资质在确保患者获得最佳治疗效果方面的重要性,并强调了皮肤科专门激光培训的价值。