Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, H4/410 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Madison VA Hospital Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Madison, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Jan;26(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03310-4. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
Although individual-level social determinants of health (SDH) are known to influence 30-day readmission risk, contextual-level associations with readmission are poorly understood among children. This study explores associations between neighborhood disadvantage measured by Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and pediatric 30-day readmissions.
This retrospective cohort study included discharges of patients aged < 20 years from Maryland's 2013-2016 all-payer dataset. The ADI, which quantifies 17 indicators of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage within census block groups, is used as a proxy for contextual-level SDH. Readmissions were identified with the 30-day Pediatric All-Condition Readmissions measure. Associations between ADI and readmission were identified with generalized estimating equations adjusted for patient demographics and clinical severity (Chronic Condition Indicator [CCI], Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm [PMCA], Index Hospital All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups [APR-DRG]), and hospital discharge volume.
Discharges (n = 138,998) were mostly female (52.7%), publicly insured (55.1%), urban-dwelling (93.0%), with low clinical severity levels (0-1 CCIs [82.3%], minor APR-DRG severity [48.4%]). Overall readmission rate was 4.0%. Compared to the least disadvantaged ADI quartile, readmissions for the most disadvantaged quartile were significantly more likely (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.30). After adjustment, readmissions were associated with public insurance and indicators of medical complexity (higher number of CCIs, complex-chronic disease PMCA, and APR-DRG severity).
In this all-payer, statewide sample, living in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods independently predicted pediatric readmission. While the relative magnitude of neighborhood disadvantage was modest compared to medical complexity, disadvantage is modifiable and thus represents an important consideration for prevention and risk stratification efforts.
虽然人们已经了解个体层面的健康社会决定因素(SDH)会影响 30 天再入院风险,但儿童再入院与环境层面社会决定因素的关联仍知之甚少。本研究探讨了用区域剥夺指数(ADI)衡量的邻里劣势与儿科 30 天再入院之间的关系。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了马里兰州 2013-2016 年全支付数据集的 20 岁以下患者出院记录。ADI 用于衡量社区群体内 17 项邻里社会经济劣势指标,是环境层面 SDH 的替代指标。使用 30 天儿科全病种再入院率来识别再入院。使用广义估计方程调整患者人口统计学和临床严重程度(慢性病指标[CCI]、儿科医疗复杂算法[PMCA]、医院出院患者修正诊断相关分组[APR-DRG])和医院出院量后,确定 ADI 与再入院之间的关联。
出院记录(n=138998)中女性(52.7%)、公共保险(55.1%)和城市居民(93.0%)居多,临床严重程度低(0-1CCI[82.3%],APR-DRG 严重程度低[48.4%])。总再入院率为 4.0%。与 ADI 最不不利的四分位相比,最不利四分位的再入院率显著更高(调整优势比[aOR]1.19,95%置信区间[CI]1.09-1.30)。调整后,再入院与公共保险和医疗复杂性指标有关(CCI 数量增加、复杂慢性疾病 PMCA 和 APR-DRG 严重程度增加)。
在本全州范围内的全支付样本中,生活在社会经济最不利的社区独立预测儿科再入院。尽管与医疗复杂性相比,邻里劣势的相对程度较小,但劣势是可以改变的,因此是预防和风险分层工作的重要考虑因素。