Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Vet Med Sci. 2022 May;8(3):1205-1210. doi: 10.1002/vms3.732. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
Many α -agonists are commonly used for sedation and analgesia in ruminants.
The present study aims to compare the sedative and physiological effects of intravenous (IV) administration of xylazine, detomidine, medetomidine and dexmedetomidine in goats.
Ten healthy goats aged 6 ± 1 months and weighing 15 ± 2 kg were used in experimental, crossover Latin square, randomised and blinded study. Animals were assigned to five IV treatments: control (normal saline); xylazine (100 μg kg ); detomidine (50 μg kg ); medetomidine (20 μg kg ) and dexmedetomidine (5 μg kg ). The degree of sedation was investigated using a numerical ranking scale of 0-10. Sedation scores were compared at each time using nonparametric (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U) tests.
Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), rectal temperature (RT), ruminal motility and capillary refill time (CRT) were performed before (baseline) and after drug administration. Animals in α -adrenergic agonist treatments were sedated at 5-60 min. There were no significant differences among α -adrenergic agonist treatments at 5-60 min in sedation scores. HR significantly decreased from baseline 5-90 min after α -adrenergic agonists' administration. Ruminal motility was decreased in α -adrenergic agonist treatments at 5, 90 and 120 min and absent at 10-60 min. A significant decrease from baseline in RR was detected between 30 and 90 min after α -adrenergic agonists' administration. RT was unchanged in any treatment for 120 min. CRT was less than 2 s at all time points following each treatment.
The duration of sedation was up to 60 min after IV administration of xylazine (100 μg kg ), detomidine (50 μg kg ), medetomidine (20 μg kg ) and dexmedetomidine (5 μg kg ) in goats in this study. No significant differences were detected between xylazine, detomidine, medetomidine and dexmedetomidine in goats.
许多α-激动剂常用于反刍动物的镇静和镇痛。
本研究旨在比较静脉注射(IV)给予二甲噻嗪、氯胺酮、美托咪定和右美托咪定在山羊中的镇静和生理效应。
10 只健康的 6±1 月龄、体重 15±2kg 的山羊在实验、交叉拉丁方、随机和盲法研究中使用。动物被分配到五种 IV 治疗中:对照(生理盐水);二甲噻嗪(100μgkg);氯胺酮(50μgkg);美托咪定(20μgkg)和右美托咪定(5μgkg)。使用数字评分量表(0-10)评估镇静程度。使用非参数(Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U)检验比较每个时间点的镇静评分。
心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、直肠温度(RT)、瘤胃蠕动和毛细血管再充盈时间(CRT)在给药前(基线)和给药后进行。α-肾上腺素能激动剂治疗的动物在 5-60min 时镇静。在 5-60min 时,α-肾上腺素能激动剂治疗之间的镇静评分没有显著差异。HR 在α-肾上腺素能激动剂给药后 5-90min 从基线显著下降。在α-肾上腺素能激动剂治疗时,瘤胃蠕动在 5、90 和 120min 时降低,而在 10-60min 时不存在。RR 在α-肾上腺素能激动剂给药后 30-90min 从基线显著下降。在任何治疗中,RT 在 120min 内均无变化。在每个治疗后的所有时间点,CRT 均小于 2s。
在本研究中,静脉注射二甲噻嗪(100μgkg)、氯胺酮(50μgkg)、美托咪定(20μgkg)和右美托咪定(5μgkg)后,山羊的镇静持续时间长达 60min。在山羊中,二甲噻嗪、氯胺酮、美托咪定和右美托咪定之间没有显著差异。