Single-voxel short-TR multi-TI multi-TE STEAM MRS for water-fat relaxometry.

PURPOSE

To propose a short-TR multi-TI multi-TE (SHORTIE, ['shȯr-tē]) STEAM single-voxel MRS acquisition scheme for the simultaneous assessment of T relaxation, T relaxation, and the proton density fat fraction at reduced scan times when compared with conventional long-TR multi-TI STEAM and long-TR multi-TE STEAM single-voxel MRS.

METHODS

Theoretical analysis for multi-TI (TI = 10, 100, 500, 1500 ms; scan time = 2:43 minutes), multi-TE (TE = 12, 15, 20, 25 ms; scan time = 2:24 minutes), and SHORTIE STEAM (all TI and TE combinations; scan time = 2:52 minutes) was carried out including Cramér-Rao lower bound and parameter estimation efficiency analysis for T (150-2000 ms) and T (5-150 ms) relaxation. The SHORTIE STEAM acquisition was compared with multi-TI STEAM and multi-TE STEAM in water-fat phantoms and in a human in vivo study of the adipose tissue depot in the supraclavicular fossa in 7 volunteers at 3 T.

RESULTS

Cramér-Rao lower bound analysis revealed similar to increased variances for T and T estimators for SHORTIE STEAM. Parameter efficiency analysis demonstrated superior performance of SHORTIE, particularly for shorter T and T when compared with multi-TI STEAM and multi-TE STEAM. For the phantom data, linear regression and Bland-Altmann analysis yielded a slope/intercept/mean difference of 1.07/-15.40/-17.18 for T (in ms; r = 0.999), 0.93/+1.32/+1.09 for T (in ms; r = 0.995), and 0.98/-0.04/+0.78 for the fat fraction (in percent; r = 0.999); and for the in vivo data 1.08/+1.77/-62.2 for T (r = 0.994), 0.88/+6.69/-1.55 for T (r = 0.884), and 0.56/+34.40/-0.46 for the fat fraction (r = 0.673), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The SHORTIE STEAM acquisition allows shorter scan times for the simultaneous probing of relaxation properties and spectral content in the water-fat environment when compared with combined long-TR multi-TI, and long-TR multi-TE STEAM.