Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias Y Rurales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Mexico, Instituto Literario 100, 50000, Centro, Toluca, Mexico.
Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Texcoco, Mexico.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Jan 11;54(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03045-6.
In order to evaluate the environmental performance generated by a "semi-technified" pig farm, as well as the comparison of different pig production scenarios, pig feed and animal production subsystems were evaluated considering both: (a) origin of feed ingredients and (b) variations in pig weight. Life cycle assessment methodology was used to evaluate the environmental performance, establishing 1 market pig as the functional unit (FU). Three ingredient origin distances (400, 950, and 1800 km) and three slaughter weights (110, 100, and 90 kg) were considered for the simulation analysis and comparison. The feed production subsystem was the main generator of environmental impacts, mainly caused by the cultivation of sorghum and the production of fat. The origin of the inputs represented the main increase in environmental impact for the feed production subsystem, mainly in the Fossil Depletion category, with a fivefold increase by acquiring inputs from 900 km and a ninefold increase at a distance of 1800 km. Producing lighter pigs resulted in the best environmental alternative, given the resultant 11% reduction in environmental impact.
为了评估“半工业化”养猪场产生的环境绩效,以及不同养猪生产方案的比较,考虑到以下两点,对猪饲料和动物生产子系统进行了评估:(a) 饲料成分的来源和 (b) 猪体重的变化。生命周期评估方法用于评估环境绩效,将 1 头市场猪作为功能单位 (FU)。模拟分析和比较考虑了三种饲料原料来源距离(400、950 和 1800 公里)和三种屠宰体重(110、100 和 90 公斤)。饲料生产子系统是环境影响的主要产生者,主要是由于高粱的种植和脂肪的生产造成的。投入品的来源代表了饲料生产子系统环境影响增加的主要原因,主要是在化石燃料消耗类别中,从 900 公里获取投入品增加了五倍,从 1800 公里获取投入品增加了九倍。生产更轻的猪是环境的最佳选择,因为这样可以减少 11%的环境影响。