Suppr超能文献

《2022 年健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告更新指南》

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations.

机构信息

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AL, Canada.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Mar;20(2):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00704-x. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

Abstract

Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.

摘要

健康经济评估是对不同行动方案的成本和结果进行的比较分析。2013 年发布的《健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)》声明旨在确保健康经济评估能够被识别、解释和用于决策。它旨在为作者提供指导,准确报告正在比较的健康干预措施及其所处的背景、评估的开展方式、结果如何以及其他可能有助于读者和评论员解释和使用研究的详细信息。新的 CHEERS 2022 声明取代了以前的 CHEERS 报告指南。它反映了需要一种更易于应用于所有类型的健康经济评估、该领域的新方法和新发展以及利益相关者(包括患者和公众)参与程度增加的指导。它也广泛适用于任何旨在改善个人或人群健康的干预措施,无论其简单或复杂,且不考虑其所处的环境(如医疗保健、公共卫生、教育、社会关怀等)。这篇总结文章介绍了新的 CHEERS 2022 清单和 28 项建议。CHEERS 2022 声明主要针对为同行评审期刊报告经济评估的研究人员以及为发表文章对其进行评估的同行评审员和编辑。然而,我们预计熟悉报告要求对计划研究的分析师会很有用。它也可能对寻求报告指导的医疗技术评估机构有用,因为决策的透明度越来越受到重视。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Type 2 Diabetes and Financial Outcomes.2型糖尿病与财务状况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2523453. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.23453.
10
Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review.含糖饮料政策模拟模型:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 3;17(10):e0275270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275270. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

3
Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comes of Age.分布成本效益分析走向成熟。
Value Health. 2021 Jan;24(1):118-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
5
Making health economic models Shiny: A tutorial.让健康经济模型变得出色:教程
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Jul 31;5:69. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15807.2. eCollection 2020.
6
Principles for deliberative processes in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中的审议程序原则。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Aug 4:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000550.
7
Growth and capacity for cost-effectiveness analysis in Africa.非洲的增长和成本效益分析能力。
Health Econ. 2020 Aug;29(8):945-954. doi: 10.1002/hec.4029. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately.健康研究报告指南经常被不恰当地使用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验