Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Psychol Sci. 2022 Feb;33(2):276-284. doi: 10.1177/09567976211034806. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
The refers to the puzzling finding that societies with more gender equality demonstrate larger gender differences across a range of phenomena, most notably in the proportion of women who pursue degrees in science, technology, engineering, and math. The present investigation demonstrates across two different measures of gender equality that this paradox extends to chess participation ( = 803,485 across 160 countries; age range: 3-100 years), specifically that women participate more often in countries with less gender equality. Previous explanations for the paradox fail to account for this finding. Instead, consistent with the notion that gender equality reflects a generational shift, mediation analyses suggest that the gender-equality paradox in chess is driven by the greater participation of younger players in countries with less gender equality. A curvilinear effect of gender equality on the participation of female players was also found, demonstrating that gender differences in chess participation are largest at the highest and lowest ends of the gender-equality spectrum.
这种性别平等悖论指的是一个令人费解的发现,即性别平等程度较高的社会在一系列现象中表现出更大的性别差异,在女性攻读科学、技术、工程和数学学位的比例上最为明显。本研究通过两种不同的性别平等衡量指标证明了这一悖论也适用于国际象棋参与度(来自 160 个国家的 803485 名参与者;年龄范围:3-100 岁),具体来说,女性在性别平等程度较低的国家参与度更高。之前对这一悖论的解释无法解释这一发现。相反,与性别平等反映代际转变的观点一致,中介分析表明,国际象棋中的性别平等悖论是由较少性别平等国家中年轻参与者的更多参与所驱动的。还发现了性别平等对女性参与者参与度的曲线效应,表明国际象棋参与度的性别差异在性别平等谱的最高端和最低端最大。