• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从网络生态系统理论的角度看跨专业合作。

Viewing interprofessional collaboration through the lens of networked ecological systems theory.

机构信息

Academic Medicine Education Institute, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):777-785. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.2007864. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1080/13561820.2021.2007864
PMID:35015602
Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is key to ensuring safe quality care for patients. However, IPC intervention outcomes are variable, leading to calls for systems theories to understand complex interactions in healthcare. Using networked ecological systems theory (NEST), we aimed to uncover facilitators and barriers impacting the interactions between nurses and physicians in a specialty healthcare center. A qualitative study involving 55 non-participant observations and 17 individual semi-structured interviews was conducted at the National Neuroscience Institute of Singapore from April 2019 to March 2021. Template analysis was used to analyze the data. The most important IPC facilitators were exosystemic institutional support and physicians' willingness to engage in IPC in the microsystems that together enabled the establishment of disease-based outpatient programs fostering patient-centered interactions among different healthcare professionals (HCP). We also found that patient-, disease-, and systems-related knowledge played an important role in facilitating IPC. Macrosystemic entrenchments such as intraprofessional composition of ward rounds emerged as a significant barrier. However, microsystemic efforts such as chat groups connecting all HCP involved in the care of the patients in the wards have fostered IPC. Although still preliminary, these findings suggest NEST can be useful to inform systematic interventions to improve IPC.

摘要

跨专业协作(IPC)是确保患者安全优质护理的关键。然而,IPC 干预的结果是可变的,这就要求我们采用系统理论来理解医疗保健中的复杂相互作用。本研究运用网络化生态系统理论(NEST),旨在揭示影响新加坡国家神经学研究所专科保健中心护士和医生之间相互作用的促进因素和障碍因素。本研究是一项定性研究,于 2019 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月在新加坡国家神经学研究所进行,共涉及 55 次非参与式观察和 17 次个体半结构式访谈。采用模板分析法对数据进行分析。最重要的 IPC 促进因素是外系统的制度支持和医生在微观系统中参与 IPC 的意愿,这两者共同促成了基于疾病的门诊项目的建立,促进了不同医疗保健专业人员(HCP)之间以患者为中心的互动。我们还发现,患者、疾病和系统相关知识在促进 IPC 方面发挥了重要作用。宏观系统的固有因素,如病房查房的同专业组成,成为了一个显著的障碍。然而,微观系统的努力,如连接病房中所有参与患者护理的 HCP 的聊天群,促进了 IPC。尽管这些发现仍初步,但表明 NEST 可用于为改善 IPC 的系统干预提供信息。

相似文献

1
Viewing interprofessional collaboration through the lens of networked ecological systems theory.从网络生态系统理论的角度看跨专业合作。
J Interprof Care. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):777-785. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.2007864. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Facilitators and barriers to interprofessional collaboration among health professionals in primary healthcare centers in Qatar: a qualitative exploration using the "Gears" model.卡塔尔基层医疗中心卫生专业人员间开展协作的促进因素和阻碍因素:运用“Gears”模型进行的定性探索。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 27;25(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02537-8.
3
Identifying practical approaches to the normalisation of interprofessional collaboration in rural hospitals: A qualitative study among health professionals.确定农村医院跨专业合作规范化的实用方法:一项针对卫生专业人员的定性研究
J Interprof Care. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):662-671. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1806216. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
4
Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.跨专业协作:基于实践的干预措施对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD000072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2.
5
A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes.系统综述中的系统综述:协作的促进因素、障碍和结果的系统评价。
J Interprof Care. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):735-749. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
6
Disengaged: a qualitative study of communication and collaboration between physicians and other professions on general internal medicine wards.脱轨:内科病房医师与其他专业之间沟通与协作的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 25;13:494. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-494.
7
Interprofessional bedside rounds: Nurse-physician collaboration and perceived barriers in an Asian hospital.跨专业床边查房:亚洲一家医院中护士与医生的协作及感知到的障碍
J Interprof Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):820-822. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1566218. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
Attitudes of nurses and physicians toward nurse-physician interprofessional collaboration in different hospitals of Islamabad-Rawalpindi Region of Pakistan.巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡-拉瓦尔品第地区不同医院的护士和医生对护士-医生跨专业合作的态度。
J Interprof Care. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):863-868. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1853079. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
9
Enacting primary healthcare interprofessional collaboration: a multisite ethnography of nurse practitioner integration in Ontario, Canada.实施初级卫生保健多专业协作:加拿大安大略省护士从业者整合的多地点民族志。
J Interprof Care. 2023 Jul-Aug;37(4):532-540. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2102591. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
10
Technology-based interprofessional collaboration in primary care for home rehabilitation of the older adults: A dutch exploratory study.基于技术的初级保健中老年家庭康复中的跨专业协作:荷兰探索性研究。
Health Informatics J. 2023 Apr-Jun;29(2):14604582231169299. doi: 10.1177/14604582231169299.

引用本文的文献

1
How patients experience nurse-doctor collaborative care at specialist clinics: A qualitative study.患者在专科诊所如何体验医护协作护理:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0321192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321192. eCollection 2025.
2
A qualitative enquiry into participants' and practitioners' experiences in the Australian Liver FaIlurE trial.对澳大利亚肝衰竭试验中参与者和从业者经历的定性调查。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e089666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089666.
3
Parents' perceptions and experiences of physical activity in childhood cancer survivors in Singapore: a qualitative study.
新加坡儿童癌症幸存者父母对其身体活动的认知与经历:一项定性研究
Singapore Med J. 2025 Jun 1;66(6):314-320. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2022-122. Epub 2023 May 30.
4
Measuring Interprofessional Collaboration's Impact on Healthcare Services Using the Quadruple Aim Framework: A Protocol Paper.运用四重目标框架衡量医护协作对医疗服务的影响:研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 1;20(9):5704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095704.