• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

防止国家痴呆症指南建议中的歧视:系统评价。

Protection against discrimination in national dementia guideline recommendations: A systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 11;19(1):e1003860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003860. eCollection 2022 Jan.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003860
PMID:35015760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8752020/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

National dementia guidelines provide recommendations about the most effective approaches to diagnosis and interventions. Guidelines can improve care, but some groups such as people with minority characteristics may be disadvantaged if recommended approaches are the same for everyone. It is not known if dementia guidelines address specific needs related to patient characteristics. The objectives of this review are to identify which countries have national guidelines for dementia and synthesise recommendations relating to protected characteristics, as defined in the UK Equality Act 2010: age, disability, gender identity, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We searched CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Medline databases and the Guideline International Network library from inception to March 4, 2020, for dementia guidelines in any language. We also searched, between April and September 2020, Google and the national health websites of all 196 countries in English and in each country's official languages. To be included, guidelines had to provide recommendations about dementia, which were expected to be followed by healthcare workers and be approved at a national policy level. We rated quality according to the iCAHE guideline quality checklist. We provide a narrative synthesis of recommendations identified for each protected characteristic, prioritising those from higher-quality guidelines. Forty-six guidelines from 44 countries met our criteria, of which 18 were rated as higher quality. Most guidelines (39/46; 85%) made at least one reference to protected characteristics, and we identified recommendations relating to age, disability, race (or culture, ethnicity, or language), religion, sex, and sexual orientation. Age was the most frequently referenced characteristic (31/46; 67%) followed by race (or culture, ethnicity, or language; 25/46; 54%). Recommendations included specialist investigation and support for younger people affected by dementia and consideration of culture when assessing whether someone had dementia and providing person-centred care. Guidelines recommended considering religion when providing person-centred and end-of-life care. For disability, it was recommended that healthcare workers consider intellectual disability and sensory impairment when assessing for dementia. Most recommendations related to sex recommended not using sex hormones to treat cognitive impairment in men and women. One guideline made one recommendation related to sexual orientation. The main limitation of this study is that we only included national guidelines applicable to a whole country meaning guidelines from countries with differing healthcare systems within the country may have been excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

National guidelines for dementia vary in their consideration of protected characteristics. We found that around a fifth of the world's countries have guidelines for dementia. We have identified areas of good practice that can be considered for future guidelines and suggest that all guidelines provide specific evidence-based recommendations for minority groups with examples of how to implement them. This will promote equity in the care of people affected by dementia and help to ensure that people with protected characteristics also have high-quality clinical services.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b75/8752020/ad7411151683/pmed.1003860.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b75/8752020/ad7411151683/pmed.1003860.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b75/8752020/ad7411151683/pmed.1003860.g001.jpg
摘要

背景

国家痴呆症指南提供了关于诊断和干预最有效的方法的建议。指南可以改善护理,但如果为每个人推荐的方法相同,某些群体(如具有少数族裔特征的人)可能会处于不利地位。目前尚不清楚痴呆症指南是否解决了与患者特征相关的具体需求。本研究的目的是确定哪些国家有针对痴呆症的国家指南,并综合分析与英国 2010 年平等法案中定义的保护特征相关的建议:年龄、残疾、性别认同、婚姻和民事伴侣关系、怀孕和产假、种族、宗教或信仰、性别和性取向。

方法和发现

我们从建库至 2020 年 3 月 4 日在 CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Medline 数据库以及指南国际网络库中检索了任何语言的痴呆症指南。我们还于 2020 年 4 月至 9 月在谷歌和 196 个国家的所有国家的英文和官方语言网站上进行了搜索。纳入标准为:指南必须提供关于痴呆症的建议,预计这些建议将得到卫生保健工作者的遵循,并在国家政策层面得到批准。我们根据 iCAHE 指南质量检查表对质量进行了评级。我们对为每个保护特征确定的建议进行了叙述性综合,优先考虑高质量指南中的建议。44 个国家的 46 项指南符合我们的标准,其中 18 项被评为高质量。大多数指南(39/46;85%)至少提到了一个保护特征,我们确定了与年龄、残疾、种族(或文化、族裔或语言)、宗教、性别和性取向相关的建议。年龄是被提及最多的特征(31/46;67%),其次是种族(或文化、族裔或语言;25/46;54%)。建议包括对受痴呆症影响的年轻人进行专门的调查和支持,以及在评估某人是否患有痴呆症和提供以患者为中心的护理时考虑文化因素。指南建议在提供以患者为中心和临终关怀时考虑宗教因素。对于残疾,建议医护人员在评估痴呆症时考虑智力残疾和感官障碍。大多数与性别相关的建议建议不要使用性激素来治疗男性和女性的认知障碍。一项指南提出了一项与性取向相关的建议。本研究的主要限制是我们只纳入了适用于整个国家的国家指南,这意味着来自国内具有不同医疗体系的国家的指南可能已被排除在外。

结论

国家痴呆症指南在考虑保护特征方面存在差异。我们发现,世界上大约有五分之一的国家有痴呆症指南。我们已经确定了一些良好的实践领域,可以为未来的指南提供参考,并建议所有指南都为少数群体提供具体的基于证据的建议,并举例说明如何实施这些建议。这将促进受痴呆症影响的人群的护理公平,并有助于确保具有保护特征的人群也能获得高质量的临床服务。

相似文献

1
Protection against discrimination in national dementia guideline recommendations: A systematic review.防止国家痴呆症指南建议中的歧视:系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 11;19(1):e1003860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003860. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
Protected characteristics reported in pulmonary rehabilitation: a scoping review.肺康复中报告的保护特征:范围综述。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Jun 12;33(172). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0236-2023. Print 2024 Apr.
7
Recommendations From the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.2023 年多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理国际循证指南推荐。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Sep 18;108(10):2447-2469. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad463.
8
Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma.减少与心理健康相关污名化的大众媒体干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;2013(7):CD009453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009453.pub2.
9
A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of sensory, psychological and behavioural interventions for managing agitation in older adults with dementia.对感官、心理和行为干预措施在管理老年痴呆症患者激越方面的临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jun;18(39):1-226, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta18390.
10
No. 367-2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity throughout Pregnancy.第367 - 2019号《加拿大孕期体育活动指南》
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Nov;40(11):1528-1537. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The rising burden of Alzheimer's and other dementias: role of high fasting plasma glucose from 1990 to 2021.阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症负担的上升:1990年至2021年空腹血糖升高的作用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 26;12:1592620. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1592620. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding dementia in minority ethnic communities: The perspectives of key stakeholders interviewed as part of the IDEAL programme.理解少数族裔社区的痴呆症:作为 IDEAL 项目一部分接受采访的主要利益相关者的观点。
Dementia (London). 2024 Oct;23(7):1172-1182. doi: 10.1177/14713012241272817. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
3
The 2022 symposium on dementia and brain aging in low- and middle-income countries: Highlights on research, diagnosis, care, and impact.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Prevalence of Young-Onset Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球早发性痴呆症的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):1080-1090. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2161.
2
Assessing the LGBT cultural competency of dementia care providers.评估痴呆症护理提供者的LGBT文化能力。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Feb 14;7(1):e12137. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12137. eCollection 2021.
3
Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia.加拿大第 5 次关于痴呆诊断和治疗的共识会议的建议。
2022 年中低收入国家痴呆症和大脑老化研讨会:研究、诊断、护理和影响的重点。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Jun;20(6):4290-4314. doi: 10.1002/alz.13836. Epub 2024 May 2.
4
Considering inequities in national dementia strategies: breadth, depth, and scope.考虑国家痴呆症策略中的不平等:广度、深度和范围。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Apr 16;23(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02166-8.
5
Do clinical guidelines support person-centred care for women affected by dementia: A content analysis.临床指南是否支持以女性痴呆患者为中心的护理:内容分析。
Dementia (London). 2024 May;23(4):525-549. doi: 10.1177/14713012241244982. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
6
The experiences of East Asian dementia caregivers in filial culture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孝道文化下东亚痴呆症照料者的经历:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 21;14:1173755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1173755. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparison of sex differences in cognitive function in older adults between high- and middle-income countries and the role of education: a population-based multicohort study.高收入和中等收入国家老年人认知功能的性别差异比较及教育的作用:一项基于人群的多队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2023 Feb 1;52(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad019.
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Aug;16(8):1182-1195. doi: 10.1002/alz.12105. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Guideline Watch (October 2014): Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias.指南更新(2014年10月):阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症患者治疗实践指南
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2017 Jan;15(1):110-128. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.15106. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
5
The Accuracy of Google Translate for Abstracting Data From Non-English-Language Trials for Systematic Reviews.谷歌翻译从非英语语言试验中提取数据用于系统评价的准确性。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 5;171(9):677-679. doi: 10.7326/M19-0891. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
6
A Systematic Review of Practice Guidelines and Recommendations for Discontinuation of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Dementia.胆碱酯酶抑制剂在痴呆症中的停药实践指南和建议的系统评价。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;26(2):134-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
7
Assessing Palliative Care Content in Dementia Care Guidelines: A Systematic Review.评估痴呆症护理指南中的姑息治疗内容:一项系统综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr;53(4):804-813. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.368. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
8
Guidelines for dementia or Parkinson's disease with depression or anxiety: a systematic review.痴呆或帕金森病伴发抑郁或焦虑的指南:一项系统评价
BMC Neurol. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0754-5.
9
Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease, and Other Dementias in the Lives of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Older Adults and Their Caregivers: Needs and Competencies.认知障碍、阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症在女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)老年群体及其照护者生活中的体现:需求与能力。
J Appl Gerontol. 2018 May;37(5):545-569. doi: 10.1177/0733464816672047. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
10
Sexuality, sexual health and older people: A systematic review of research on the knowledge and attitudes of health professionals.性取向、性健康与老年人:对健康专业人员知识与态度研究的系统综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:57-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 24.