Suppr超能文献

道德承诺能否预测对腐败的抵制?贿赂游戏的实验证据。

Does moral commitment predict resistance to corruption? experimental evidence from a bribery game.

机构信息

Department of Banking and Finance, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Chair of Economic Psychology and Leadership Ethics, Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen, Friedrichshafen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262201. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Corruption is ubiquitous in practice and has severe negative consequences for organizations and societies at large. Drawing on a laboratory experiment, we propose that individuals high in moral commitment are less likely to engage in corrupt behaviors and prefer foregoing financial benefits. Specifically, we posit that individuals refrain from corruption (i) the more they endorse integrity (incorruptibility) as a protected value and (ii) the higher their level of Honesty-Humility. The results of a two-step experiment largely support our expectations: people who treat compromises to integrity as unacceptable were less willing to accept bribes, and Honesty-Humility decreased bribe-giving. The findings are robust to demographic variables (e.g., age, gender, cultural background) and additional personal characteristics (e.g., risk tolerance, dispositional greed) and have important implications for ongoing theory-building efforts and business practice.

摘要

腐败在实践中普遍存在,对组织和整个社会都有严重的负面影响。本研究通过实验室实验发现,道德承诺水平高的个体不太可能从事腐败行为,更愿意放弃经济利益。具体来说,我们假设个体避免腐败的行为受到以下两个因素的影响:(1)他们越认可正直(廉洁)作为受保护的价值观;(2)他们的诚实-谦逊水平越高。两步实验的结果在很大程度上支持了我们的预期:将对正直的妥协视为不可接受的人不太愿意接受贿赂,而诚实-谦逊则降低了贿赂的给予。研究结果对人口统计学变量(如年龄、性别、文化背景)和其他个人特征(如风险承受能力、倾向贪婪)具有稳健性,对正在进行的理论构建努力和商业实践具有重要意义。

相似文献

2
"Who Doesn't?"--The Impact of Descriptive Norms on Corruption.“谁不这样呢?”——描述性规范对腐败的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131830. eCollection 2015.
4
Neural basis of corruption in power-holders.掌权者腐败的神经基础。
Elife. 2021 Mar 24;10:e63922. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63922.
5
Bribe and Punishment: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Analysis of Bribery.贿赂与惩罚:贿赂行为的进化博弈论分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 23;10(7):e0133441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133441. eCollection 2015.
6
Bribery games on interdependent complex networks.贿赂博弈在相互依存的复杂网络中。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Aug 7;450:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
Predictors of Bribe-Taking: The Role of Bribe Size and Personality.受贿的预测因素:贿赂规模与人格的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 10;9:1511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01511. eCollection 2018.
9
The Road to Bribery and Corruption.走向贪污腐败之路。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;28(3):297-306. doi: 10.1177/0956797616682026. Epub 2017 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

2
Plagiarism in Publications: All about Being Fair!出版物中的剽窃行为:一切关乎公平!
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S36-S45. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791745. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

2
Predictors of Bribe-Taking: The Role of Bribe Size and Personality.受贿的预测因素:贿赂规模与人格的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 10;9:1511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01511. eCollection 2018.
5
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
6
"Who Doesn't?"--The Impact of Descriptive Norms on Corruption.“谁不这样呢?”——描述性规范对腐败的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131830. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验