• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

走向贪污腐败之路。

The Road to Bribery and Corruption.

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;28(3):297-306. doi: 10.1177/0956797616682026. Epub 2017 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1177/0956797616682026
PMID:28080302
Abstract

Major forms of corruption constitute a strong threat to the functioning of societies. The most frequent explanation of how severe corruption emerges is the slippery-slope metaphor-the notion that corruption occurs gradually. While having widespread theoretical and intuitive appeal, this notion has barely been tested empirically. We used a recently developed paradigm to test whether severely corrupt acts happen gradually or abruptly. The results of four experimental studies revealed a higher likelihood of severe corruption when participants were directly given the opportunity to engage in it (abrupt) compared with when they had previously engaged in minor forms of corruption (gradual). Neither the size of the payoffs, which we kept constant, nor evaluations of the actions could account for these differences. Contrary to widely shared beliefs, sometimes the route to corruption leads over a steep cliff rather than a slippery slope.

摘要

主要形式的腐败对社会的运作构成了严重威胁。关于腐败如何严重发生的最常见解释是滑坡隐喻——即腐败是逐渐发生的观点。虽然这一观点在理论上和直观上具有广泛的吸引力,但几乎没有经过实证检验。我们使用最近开发的范式来检验严重的腐败行为是逐渐发生还是突然发生。四项实验研究的结果表明,当参与者直接有机会从事腐败行为(突然)时,他们从事严重腐败行为的可能性更高,而不是当他们之前从事过轻微形式的腐败行为(逐渐)时。我们保持不变的是薪酬的大小,以及对行为的评估,都不能解释这些差异。与普遍的看法相反,有时腐败的途径是一条陡峭的悬崖,而不是一个滑坡。

相似文献

1
The Road to Bribery and Corruption.走向贪污腐败之路。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;28(3):297-306. doi: 10.1177/0956797616682026. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
2
"Who Doesn't?"--The Impact of Descriptive Norms on Corruption.“谁不这样呢?”——描述性规范对腐败的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131830. eCollection 2015.
3
Tolerance for corruption and descriptive social norm: An experimental study of embezzlement.容忍腐败和描述性社会规范:对贪污的实验研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303558. eCollection 2024.
4
Neural basis of corruption in power-holders.掌权者腐败的神经基础。
Elife. 2021 Mar 24;10:e63922. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63922.
5
The slippery slope: how small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions.滑坡谬误:微小的道德越轨行为如何为更大的未来越轨行为铺平道路。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):114-27. doi: 10.1037/a0036950. Epub 2014 May 26.
6
Ethical Free Riding: When Honest People Find Dishonest Partners.道德搭便车:当诚实的人找到不诚实的伙伴时。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;29(12):1956-1968. doi: 10.1177/0956797618796480. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Does moral commitment predict resistance to corruption? experimental evidence from a bribery game.道德承诺能否预测对腐败的抵制?贿赂游戏的实验证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262201. eCollection 2022.
8
Corruption and the Other(s): Scope of Superordinate Identity Matters for Corruption Permissibility.腐败与他者:上级身份范围对腐败可容许性的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144542. eCollection 2015.
9
The Influence of Sociocultural Beliefs on Adolescents' Moral and Tolerance Evaluations Toward Corruption.社会文化信仰对青少年对腐败的道德及宽容度评价的影响
J Res Adolesc. 2022 Dec;32(4):1515-1529. doi: 10.1111/jora.12729. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
10
When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery Game.情境何时以及为何会预测不道德行为:来自实验室贿赂游戏的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 9;12:675319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675319. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The interactive effect between economic uncertainty and life history strategy on corrupt intentions: a life history theory approach.经济不确定性与生活史策略对腐败意图的交互作用:一种生活史理论方法
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 30;15:1361158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361158. eCollection 2024.
2
Conditional bribery: Insights from incentivized experiments across 18 nations.有条件贿赂:18 个国家激励实验的洞察。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 2;120(18):e2209731120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209731120. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Why people engage in corrupt collaboration: an observation at the multi-brain level.
为什么人们会从事腐败合作:多脑水平的观察。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 20;33(13):8465-8476. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad132.
4
Bad machines corrupt good morals.坏机器会腐蚀良好的道德。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jun;5(6):679-685. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01128-2. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
Corruption, Fast or Slow? Ethical Leadership Interacts With Machiavellianism to Influence Intuitive Thinking and Corruption.腐败,快还是慢?道德领导与马基雅维利主义相互作用以影响直觉思维和腐败。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 13;11:578419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578419. eCollection 2020.
6
Dishonesty as a signal of trustworthiness: Honesty-Humility and trustworthy dishonesty.作为可信赖信号的不诚实:诚实谦逊与值得信赖的不诚实。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Oct 28;7(10):200685. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200685. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
Rule Following Mitigates Collaborative Cheating and Facilitates the Spreading of Honesty Within Groups.规则遵循可以减轻协作作弊的程度,并促进群体内部诚实的传播。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Mar;47(3):395-409. doi: 10.1177/0146167220927195. Epub 2020 Jun 17.