• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

8至9岁通过冷冻和新鲜胚胎移植的辅助生殖技术出生的单胎儿童的心血管功能。

Cardiovascular function in 8- to 9-year-old singletons born after ART with frozen and fresh embryo transfer.

作者信息

Mizrak I, Asserhøj L L, Lund M A V, Kielstrup L R, Greisen G, Clausen T D, Main K M, Jensen R B, Vejlstrup N G, Madsen P L, Pinborg A

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev-Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.

Fertility Department, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, Copenhagen.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 1;37(3):600-611. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab284.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/deab284
PMID:35015837
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Do 8- to 9-year-old singletons conceived after frozen embryo transfer (FET) or fresh embryo transfer (Fresh-ET) have increased arterial stiffness compared to naturally conceived (NC) children?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The process of FET or Fresh-ET is not associated with altered cardiovascular function in 8- to 9-year-old singletons, including arterial stiffness, as compared to NC children.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

ART has been suggested to influence cardiovascular risk factors (i.e. endothelial dysfunction, increased arterial blood pressure and insulin resistance). It is not known if ART procedures alter arterial stiffness in singletons.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cohort study was carried out, including 8- to 9-year-old singletons conceived after FET, Fresh-ET and NC children (50 children in each group). This study was conducted between November 2018 and August 2020.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In total, 150 singletons were identified through the Danish IVF Registry and the Medical Birth Registry. They underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and anthropometric measurements. Parental data were collected using questionnaires. NC children were matched by sex and birth year with FET/Fresh-ET children. Exclusion criteria were congenital heart disease, maternal gestational diabetes or maternal diabetes mellitus. Our primary outcome was arterial stiffness, which is assessed from noninvasive arterial blood pressure and aortic ascendens distensibility. The secondary outcome was the pulse wave velocity of total aorta and exploratory outcomes were left ventricular ejection fraction, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output and total peripheral resistance. Measurements and analyses were performed blinded to the child group.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Aortic ascendens distensibility of children conceived after FET and Fresh-ET did not differ from NC children (mean (SD): FET 11.1 (3.6) 10-3 mmHg-1, Fresh-ET 11.8 (3.0) 10-3 mmHg-1, NC 11.4 (2.8) 10-3 mmHg-1, P > 0.05). Multivariate linear regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders (i.e. child sex and age, maternal BMI at early pregnancy and maternal educational level). Data showed no statistically significant differences between study groups and aortic ascendens distensibility. However, the fully adjusted model showed a non-significant tendency of lowered aortic ascendens distensibility in children born after FET compared to Fresh-ET (β estimate (95% CI): -0.99 10-3 mmHg-1 (-2.20; 0.21)) and NC children (β estimate (95% CI): -0.77 10-3 mmHg-1 (-1.98; 0.44)). Lastly, secondary and exploratory outcomes did not differ between the groups. Primary and secondary outcomes showed good intra-rater reliability.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is possibly limited by potential selection bias as the participation rate was higher in the ART compared to the NC group. Also, in some variables, the study groups differed slightly from the non-participant population. The non-participant population (n = 1770) included those who were excluded, not invited to CMR scan, or declined to participate in this study.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings indicate that children born after FET or Fresh-ET do not have altered cardiovascular function, including arterial stiffness. This is reassuring for the future use of ART.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant reference number: NNF19OC0054340) and The Research Foundation of Rigshospitalet. All authors declared no conflict of interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03719703.

摘要

研究问题

与自然受孕(NC)的儿童相比,冻融胚胎移植(FET)或新鲜胚胎移植(Fresh-ET)后出生的8至9岁单胎儿童的动脉僵硬度是否增加?

总结答案

与NC儿童相比,FET或Fresh-ET过程与8至9岁单胎儿童的心血管功能改变无关,包括动脉僵硬度。

已知信息

有研究表明辅助生殖技术(ART)会影响心血管危险因素(即内皮功能障碍、动脉血压升高和胰岛素抵抗)。但尚不清楚ART程序是否会改变单胎儿童的动脉僵硬度。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:进行了一项队列研究,纳入FET、Fresh-ET后出生的8至9岁单胎儿童以及NC儿童(每组50名儿童)。该研究于2018年11月至2020年8月期间进行。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:通过丹麦体外受精登记处和医疗出生登记处共识别出150名单胎儿童。他们接受了心脏磁共振成像(CMR)和人体测量。通过问卷收集父母的数据。NC儿童按性别和出生年份与FET/Fresh-ET儿童进行匹配。排除标准为先天性心脏病、母亲妊娠期糖尿病或母亲糖尿病。我们的主要结局是动脉僵硬度,通过无创动脉血压和升主动脉扩张性进行评估。次要结局是总主动脉脉搏波速度,探索性结局是左心室射血分数、平均动脉压、心输出量和总外周阻力。测量和分析对儿童分组情况设盲。

主要结果及机遇的作用

FET和Fresh-ET后出生儿童的升主动脉扩张性与NC儿童无差异(均值(标准差):FET 11.1(3.6)×10⁻³ mmHg⁻¹,Fresh-ET 11.8(3.0)×10⁻³ mmHg⁻¹,NC 11.4(2.8)×10⁻³ mmHg⁻¹,P>0.05)。进行多变量线性回归以调整潜在混杂因素(即儿童性别和年龄、孕早期母亲体重指数和母亲教育水平)。数据显示研究组之间升主动脉扩张性无统计学显著差异。然而,完全调整模型显示,与Fresh-ET后出生儿童相比,FET后出生儿童的升主动脉扩张性有降低的非显著趋势(β估计值(95%置信区间):-0.99×10⁻³ mmHg⁻¹(-2.20;0.21)),与NC儿童相比也有降低的非显著趋势(β估计值(95%置信区间):-0.77×10⁻³ mmHg⁻¹(-1.98;0.44))。最后,次要和探索性结局在各组之间无差异。主要和次要结局显示出良好的评分者内信度。

局限性、谨慎理由:本研究可能受潜在选择偏倚的限制,因为ART组的参与率高于NC组。此外,在一些变量上,研究组与未参与者人群略有不同。未参与者人群(n = 1770)包括被排除者、未被邀请进行CMR扫描者或拒绝参与本研究者。

研究结果的更广泛影响

我们的研究结果表明,FET或Fresh-ET后出生的儿童心血管功能未改变,包括动脉僵硬度。这为ART的未来应用提供了安心的依据。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究由诺和诺德基金会(资助编号:NNF19OC0054340)和里格霍斯医院研究基金会资助。所有作者均声明无利益冲突。

试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03719703。

相似文献

1
Cardiovascular function in 8- to 9-year-old singletons born after ART with frozen and fresh embryo transfer.8至9岁通过冷冻和新鲜胚胎移植的辅助生殖技术出生的单胎儿童的心血管功能。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 1;37(3):600-611. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab284.
2
Childhood BMI after ART with frozen embryo transfer.冷冻胚胎移植辅助生殖技术后的儿童体重指数
Hum Reprod. 2023 Aug 1;38(8):1578-1589. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead127.
3
Blood pressure and lipid profiles in children born after ART with frozen embryo transfer.冷冻胚胎移植辅助生殖技术出生儿童的血压和血脂状况
Hum Reprod Open. 2024 Mar 20;2024(2):hoae016. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae016. eCollection 2024.
4
Growth of twins conceived using assisted reproductive treatments up to 5 years old: a national growth cohort.使用辅助生殖技术受孕的双胞胎至 5 岁时的生长情况:一项全国性生长队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Apr 3;38(4):751-761. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead018.
5
Health of singletons born after frozen embryo transfer until early adulthood: a Finnish register study.冻融胚胎移植后出生的单胎婴儿至成年早期的健康:一项芬兰登记研究。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Nov 24;37(12):2899-2907. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac211.
6
High birth weight and large-for-gestational-age in singletons born after frozen compared to fresh embryo transfer, by gestational week: a Nordic register study from the CoNARTaS group.与新鲜胚胎移植相比,冷冻胚胎移植后出生的单胎儿中,巨大儿和大于胎龄儿按孕周分组的情况:CoNARTaS 组的一项北欧注册研究。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Mar 18;36(4):1083-1092. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa304.
7
Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique?冻融胚胎移植(FET)后出生的单胎儿中的巨大儿综合征:是母体因素还是 cryotechnique 所致?
Hum Reprod. 2014 Mar;29(3):618-27. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det440. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
8
Cardiac remodeling in fetuses conceived by ARTs: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer.ART 受孕胎儿的心脏重构:新鲜胚胎移植与冷冻胚胎移植。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Sep 18;36(10):2697-2708. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab159.
9
Growth of singletons born after frozen embryo transfer until early adulthood: a Finnish register study.冻融胚胎移植后单胎婴儿至成年早期的生长情况:一项芬兰登记研究。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Mar 1;39(3):604-611. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead264.
10
Is large for gestational age in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer associated with freezing technique or endometrial preparation protocol? A longitudinal national French study.冻融胚胎移植后出生的单胎儿中巨大儿与冷冻技术或子宫内膜准备方案有关吗?一项法国全国性的纵向研究。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Apr 3;39(4):724-732. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae027.

引用本文的文献

1
Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in children born after ART with frozen and fresh embryo transfers.接受冷冻和新鲜胚胎移植的辅助生殖技术出生儿童的内脏和皮下脂肪组织
Hum Reprod Open. 2025 Mar 17;2025(2):hoaf014. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaf014. eCollection 2025.
2
Infertility treatment and offspring blood pressure-a systematic review and meta-analysis.不孕症治疗与子代血压——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Hum Reprod Update. 2025 Jan 1;31(1):2-20. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae029.
3
Metabolic profiles of children aged 2-5 years born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: A Chinese cohort study.
2-5 岁儿童代谢特征:冻融胚胎移植与新鲜胚胎移植后队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2024 Jun 6;21(6):e1004388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004388. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Blood pressure and lipid profiles in children born after ART with frozen embryo transfer.冷冻胚胎移植辅助生殖技术出生儿童的血压和血脂状况
Hum Reprod Open. 2024 Mar 20;2024(2):hoae016. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae016. eCollection 2024.
5
Cardiovascular health of offspring conceived by assisted reproduction technology: a comprehensive review.辅助生殖技术所孕育后代的心血管健康:一项综合综述。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 16;11:1287060. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1287060. eCollection 2024.
6
Ultrasound evaluation of the cardiovascular system in offspring conceived through assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术受孕子代心血管系统的超声评估。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Mar;41(3):623-634. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03029-5. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
7
The longer-term effects of IVF on offspring from childhood to adolescence.体外受精对后代从童年到青春期的长期影响。
Front Reprod Health. 2022 Dec 8;4:1045762. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.1045762. eCollection 2022.
8
Conception by fertility treatment and cardiometabolic risk in middle childhood.生育治疗与儿童中期心脏代谢风险的关系。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug;118(2):349-359. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.04.030. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
9
Comparison of the cardiometabolic profiles of adolescents conceived through ART with those of a non-ART cohort.比较通过 ART 受孕的青少年与非 ART 队列的心血管代谢特征。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 30;37(8):1880-1895. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac122.