• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济防御资源结构在合作性肉食动物中对领地空间利用的影响。

Economical defence of resources structures territorial space use in a cooperative carnivore.

机构信息

Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.

US Geological Survey, Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Jan 12;289(1966):20212512. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2512.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2021.2512
PMID:35016539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8753142/
Abstract

Ecologists have long sought to understand space use and mechanisms underlying patterns observed in nature. We developed an optimality landscape and mechanistic territory model to understand mechanisms driving space use and compared model predictions to empirical reality. We demonstrate our approach using grey wolves (). In the model, simulated animals selected territories to economically acquire resources by selecting patches with greatest value, accounting for benefits, costs and trade-offs of defending and using space on the optimality landscape. Our approach successfully predicted and explained first- and second-order space use of wolves, including the population's distribution, territories of individual packs, and influences of prey density, competitor density, human-caused mortality risk and seasonality. It accomplished this using simple behavioural rules and limited data to inform the optimality landscape. Results contribute evidence that economical territory selection is a mechanistic bridge between space use and animal distribution on the landscape. This approach and resulting gains in knowledge enable predicting effects of a wide range of environmental conditions, contributing to both basic ecological understanding of natural systems and conservation. We expect this approach will demonstrate applicability across diverse habitats and species, and that its foundation can help continue to advance understanding of spatial behaviour.

摘要

生态学家长期以来一直试图了解自然界中观察到的空间利用模式和潜在机制。我们开发了一个最优景观和机械领域模型来理解驱动空间利用的机制,并将模型预测与经验现实进行比较。我们使用灰狼()来演示我们的方法。在模型中,模拟动物通过选择具有最大价值的斑块来经济地获取资源,从而在最优景观上考虑防御和利用空间的收益、成本和权衡。我们的方法成功地预测和解释了狼的第一和第二级空间利用,包括种群的分布、单个狼群的领地以及猎物密度、竞争密度、人为死亡率风险和季节性的影响。它使用简单的行为规则和有限的数据来为最优景观提供信息,从而实现了这一点。结果为经济的领地选择是空间利用和景观上动物分布之间的机械桥梁提供了证据。这种方法和由此产生的知识增益使我们能够预测广泛的环境条件的影响,为自然系统的基础生态理解和保护做出贡献。我们预计这种方法将适用于各种不同的栖息地和物种,并且其基础可以帮助继续推进对空间行为的理解。

相似文献

1
Economical defence of resources structures territorial space use in a cooperative carnivore.经济防御资源结构在合作性肉食动物中对领地空间利用的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Jan 12;289(1966):20212512. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2512.
2
Evidence of economical territory selection in a cooperative carnivore.合作食肉动物中经济领地选择的证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Mar 10;288(1946):20210108. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0108. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
3
Territoriality drives preemptive habitat selection in recovering wolves: Implications for carnivore conservation.领域性驱动恢复中的狼群抢先选择栖息地:对食肉动物保护的启示。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jun;89(6):1433-1447. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13199. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
4
Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality.狼会根据当地栖息地质量调整领地大小,而非狼群规模。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Sep;84(5):1177-86. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12366. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
5
Integrating basic and applied research to estimate carnivore abundance.整合基础研究与应用研究以估算食肉动物数量。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Dec;32(8):e2714. doi: 10.1002/eap.2714. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
6
Territory quality determines social group composition in Ethiopian wolves Canis simensis.领地质量决定了埃塞俄比亚狼(Canis simensis)的社会群体组成。
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jan;81(1):24-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01911.x. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
7
Group density, disease, and season shape territory size and overlap of social carnivores.群体密度、疾病和季节影响着群居食肉动物的领地大小和重叠程度。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Jan;90(1):87-101. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13294. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
8
Inter-specific territoriality in a Canis hybrid zone: spatial segregation between wolves, coyotes, and hybrids.种间领域性在犬科动物杂交区:狼、郊狼和杂交种之间的空间隔离。
Oecologia. 2013 Dec;173(4):1539-50. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2730-8. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
9
Decomposing risk: landscape structure and wolf behavior generate different predation patterns in two sympatric ungulates.分解风险:景观结构和狼的行为在两种同域有蹄类动物中产生不同的捕食模式。
Ecol Appl. 2013 Oct;23(7):1722-34. doi: 10.1890/12-1615.1.
10
Large carnivores avoid humans while prioritizing prey acquisition in anthropogenic areas.大型食肉动物在人为区域会避开人类,同时优先获取猎物。
J Anim Ecol. 2023 Apr;92(4):889-900. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13900. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Dingo movement depends on sex, social status and litter size.澳洲野犬的活动取决于性别、社会地位和一窝幼崽的数量。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jul 30;12(7):250255. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250255. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Genetic Connectivity in a Cooperatively Breeding Carnivore Between Two Protected Areas.两个保护区之间合作繁殖食肉动物的遗传连通性
Ecol Evol. 2025 May 14;15(5):e71420. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71420. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Age, sex, and temperature shape off-territory feeder use in black-capped chickadees.年龄、性别和温度影响黑顶山雀在领地外觅食的行为。
Behav Ecol. 2024 Oct 3;35(6):arae080. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arae080. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence of economical territory selection in a cooperative carnivore.合作食肉动物中经济领地选择的证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Mar 10;288(1946):20210108. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0108. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
Mechanistic home range analysis reveals drivers of space use patterns for a non-territorial passerine.机理型家域分析揭示了一种非领地性雀形目鸟类空间利用模式的驱动因素。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Dec;89(12):2763-2776. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13292. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
3
Group density, disease, and season shape territory size and overlap of social carnivores.群体密度、疾病和季节影响着群居食肉动物的领地大小和重叠程度。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Jan;90(1):87-101. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13294. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Territorial behavior in Southeast Asian langurs: Resource defense or mate defense?东南亚叶猴的领地行为:资源防御还是配偶防御?
Am J Primatol. 1992;26(4):233-242. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350260402.
5
2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education.美国哺乳动物学会2016年关于在研究和教育中使用野生哺乳动物的指南。
J Mammal. 2016 Jun 9;97(3):663-688. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw078. Epub 2016 May 28.
6
How memory of direct animal interactions can lead to territorial pattern formation.直接动物互动的记忆如何导致领地模式的形成。
J R Soc Interface. 2016 May;13(118). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0059.
7
Interannual variability: a crucial component of space use at the territory level.年际变化:领地层面空间利用的关键组成部分。
Ecology. 2015 Jan;96(1):62-70. doi: 10.1890/13-2116.1.
8
Space-use behaviour of woodland caribou based on a cognitive movement model.基于认知运动模型的林地驯鹿空间利用行为
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jul;84(4):1059-70. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12357. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
9
Territoriality and home-range dynamics in meerkats, Suricata suricatta: a mechanistic modelling approach.狐獴(Suricata suricatta)的领地性和活动范围动态:一种机制建模方法
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jan;84(1):260-71. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12267. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
10
How do animal territories form and change? Lessons from 20 years of mechanistic modelling.动物领地是如何形成和变化的?20 年来机械建模的经验教训。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 16;281(1784):20140231. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0231. Print 2014 Jun 7.