• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国慢性病青少年获益发现量表的验证

Validation of the German Benefit Finding Scale for Youth with chronic conditions.

作者信息

von Rezori Roman E, Buchallik Friederike, Warschburger Petra

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Counseling Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht- Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Jan 11;16(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00438-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13034-021-00438-7
PMID:35016724
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8753927/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Benefit finding, defined as perceiving positive life changes resulting from adversity and negative life stressors, gains growing attention in the context of chronic illness. The study aimed at examining the psychometric properties of the Benefit Finding Scale for Children (BFSC) in a sample of German youth facing chronic conditions.

METHODS

A sample of adolescents with various chronic conditions (N = 304; 12 - 21years) completed the 10-item BFSC along with measures of intra- and interpersonal resources, coping strategies, and health-related quality of life (hrQoL). The total sample was randomly divided into two subsamples for conducting exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA/CFA).

RESULTS

EFA revealed that the BFSC scores had a one-dimensional factor structure. CFA verified the one-dimensional factor structure with an acceptable fit. The BFSC exhibited acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.87 - 0.88) and construct validity. In line with our hypotheses, benefit finding was positively correlated with optimism, self-esteem, self-efficacy, sense of coherence, and support seeking. There were no correlations with avoidance, wishful thinking, emotional reaction, and hrQoL. Sex differences in benefit finding were not consistent across subsamples. Benefit finding was also positively associated with age, disease severity, and social status.

CONCLUSIONS

The BFSC is a psychometrically sound instrument to assess benefit finding in adolescents with chronic illness and may facilitate further research on positive adaptation processes in adolescents, irrespective of their specific diagnosis.

摘要

背景

益处发现被定义为感知到逆境和负面生活压力源所带来的积极生活变化,在慢性病背景下日益受到关注。本研究旨在检验儿童益处发现量表(BFSC)在面临慢性病的德国青少年样本中的心理测量特性。

方法

一个患有各种慢性病的青少年样本(N = 304;12 - 21岁)完成了包含10个条目的BFSC,以及关于个体内和人际资源、应对策略和健康相关生活质量(hrQoL)的测量。总样本被随机分为两个子样本,用于进行探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA/CFA)。

结果

探索性因素分析表明BFSC得分具有单维因素结构。验证性因素分析证实了具有可接受拟合度的单维因素结构。BFSC表现出可接受的内部一致性(α = 0.87 - 0.88)和结构效度。与我们的假设一致,益处发现与乐观、自尊、自我效能感、连贯感和寻求支持呈正相关。与回避、一厢情愿的想法、情绪反应和hrQoL无相关性。不同子样本中益处发现的性别差异并不一致。益处发现也与年龄、疾病严重程度和社会地位呈正相关。

结论

BFSC是一种心理测量学上可靠的工具,用于评估患有慢性病的青少年的益处发现情况,并且可能有助于进一步研究青少年的积极适应过程,无论他们的具体诊断如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86aa/8753927/08b1a6e1f705/13034_2021_438_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86aa/8753927/08b1a6e1f705/13034_2021_438_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86aa/8753927/08b1a6e1f705/13034_2021_438_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the German Benefit Finding Scale for Youth with chronic conditions.德国慢性病青少年获益发现量表的验证
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Jan 11;16(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00438-7.
2
Benefit Finding Scale for Children: preliminary findings from a childhood cancer population.儿童益处发现量表:来自儿童癌症群体的初步研究结果。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2007 Nov-Dec;32(10):1264-71. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsl052. Epub 2007 Jan 7.
3
Benefit finding in survivors of childhood cancer and their parents: further empirical support for the Benefit Finding Scale for Children.儿童癌症幸存者及其父母的获益发现:对儿童获益发现量表的进一步实证支持。
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Jan;36(1):123-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01034.x. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
4
Validity and Reliability of the Sense of Coherence Scale among Korean Adolescents with Chronic Diseases.慢性病韩国青少年领悟社会支持量表的信度和效度。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;61:e22-e28. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
Finding Silver Linings: A Preliminary Examination of Benefit Finding in Youth With Chronic Pain.寻找一线希望:慢性疼痛青少年的益处发现初探。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Apr 1;43(3):285-293. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx126.
6
Inclusive measure development: amplifying the voices of adolescents and young adults with spina bifida in a new measure of benefit-finding and growth.包容性措施制定:在新的受益发现和成长衡量标准中,扩大脊柱裂青少年和年轻人的声音。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2024 Nov 1;49(11):802-811. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsae072.
7
Factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): A study on persons with serious mental illness living in the community.《简要韧性量表(BRS)的因子结构、内部信度和建构效度:一项针对社区中严重精神疾病患者的研究》
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Sep;94(3):620-645. doi: 10.1111/papt.12336. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
8
Coping strategies among children and adolescents: validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Kidcope scale.儿童和青少年的应对策略:儿童应对量表阿拉伯语版本的效度和信度
Heliyon. 2022 Jan 4;8(1):e08706. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08706. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Testing a model of benefit-finding and growth in youths with chronic health conditions.测试一种在患有慢性健康状况的青少年中发现益处和成长的模型。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04467-3.
10
Psychometric qualities of the English Coping Scales of the Stress and Coping Inventory in a representative UK sample.英国代表性样本中应激与应对量表的英文应对量表的心理计量学特性。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Feb 2;9(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00528-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Positive Psychology Insights on the Effects of Spirituality on Shared Decision-Making in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: The Chain-Mediated Effects of Benefit-Finding and Decision Self-Efficacy.积极心理学视角下灵性对慢性心力衰竭患者共同决策的影响:获益发现与决策自我效能的链式中介效应
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 19;13(10):1188. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101188.
2
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Benefit Finding Questionnaire for people with mental disorders.中文版心理障碍获益探寻问卷的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0291586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291586. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Hope and benefit finding: Results from the PRISM randomized controlled trial.希望与益处发现:PRISM 随机对照试验的结果。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Jan;66(1):e27485. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27485. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
2
Longitudinal trajectories of benefit finding in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病青少年益处发现的纵向轨迹
Health Psychol. 2017 Oct;36(10):977-986. doi: 10.1037/hea0000513. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.
Testing a model of benefit-finding and growth in youths with chronic health conditions.
测试一种在患有慢性健康状况的青少年中发现益处和成长的模型。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04467-3.
测量不变性的惯例与报告:心理学研究的现状与未来方向
Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
4
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
5
Common Factor Analysis Versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters?共同因子分析与主成分分析:在表示模型参数方面的差异偏差?
Multivariate Behav Res. 1993 Jul 1;28(3):263-311. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_1.
6
Benefit finding in response to general life stress: measurement and correlates.应对一般生活压力中的益处发现:测量与相关因素
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):268-282. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2014.889570. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
7
"Shift-and-Persist" Strategies: Why Low Socioeconomic Status Isn't Always Bad for Health.“转变并坚持”策略:为何社会经济地位低下并不总是对健康有害。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Mar;7(2):135-58. doi: 10.1177/1745691612436694.
8
Coping with chronic illness in childhood and adolescence.应对儿童和青少年时期的慢性疾病。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:455-80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143108. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
9
Posttraumatic growth among children and adolescents: a systematic review.儿童和青少年创伤后成长:系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;31(6):949-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
10
Measuring perceived benefit and disease-related burden in young cancer survivors: validation of the Benefit and Burden Scale for Children (BBSC) in The Netherlands.测量青少年癌症幸存者的感知获益和疾病相关负担:荷兰儿童获益和负担量表(BBSC)的验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1249-53. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1206-9. Epub 2011 Jun 11.