• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人活体肝移植中单纯腹腔镜与开放供体肝切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析

Pure laparoscopic versus open donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Papoulas Michail, Hakeem Abdul Rahman, Heaton Nigel, Menon Krishna V

机构信息

Department of Institute of Liver Studies, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.

Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, St. James's University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;18(1):1-11. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_103_21.

DOI:10.4103/jmas.JMAS_103_21
PMID:35017391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8830577/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) for adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of donor outcomes following PLDH for adult LDLT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic review in line with the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the systematic review and six in the meta-analysis. A total of 575 donors underwent PLDH for adult LDLT. The mean donor age was 32.8 years with a BMI of 23.4 kg/m and graft weight of 675 g. The mean operative time was 353 min and the conversion rate was 2.8% (n = 16). Overall morbidity was 10.8% with 1.6% major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3b), zero mortality and 9.0 days length of stay (LOS). The meta-analysis demonstrated that the operative time was significantly shorter for the open donor hepatectomy group (mean difference 29.15 min; P = 0.006) and the LOS was shorter for the PLDH group (mean difference -0.73 days; P = 0.02), with a trend towards lesser estimated blood loss in PLDH group. However, no difference between the two groups was noted in terms of overall morbidity or major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative outcomes of PLDH are similar to the standard open approach in highly specialised centers with trend towards lesser blood loss and overall shorter hospital stay. Careful donor selection and standardisation of the technique are imperative for the successful implementation and adoption of the procedure worldwide.

摘要

背景

成人活体肝移植(LDLT)的单纯腹腔镜供体肝切除术(PLDH)仍存在争议。本研究的目的是对成人LDLT行PLDH后的供体结局进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

材料与方法

按照流行病学观察性研究荟萃分析指南进行系统评价。

结果

系统评价纳入8项研究,荟萃分析纳入6项研究。共有575例供体接受了成人LDLT的PLDH。供体平均年龄为32.8岁,体重指数为23.4kg/m,移植物重量为675g。平均手术时间为353分钟,中转率为2.8%(n = 16)。总体发病率为10.8%,严重并发症发生率为1.6%(Clavien-Dindo 3b级),无死亡病例,住院时间为9.0天。荟萃分析表明,开放供体肝切除组的手术时间明显更短(平均差值29.15分钟;P = 0.006),PLDH组的住院时间更短(平均差值-0.73天;P = 0.02),PLDH组估计失血量有减少趋势。然而,两组在总体发病率或严重并发症方面无差异。

结论

在高度专业化的中心,PLDH的围手术期结局与标准开放手术相似,有失血量减少和总体住院时间缩短的趋势。仔细的供体选择和技术标准化对于该手术在全球的成功实施和应用至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/8830577/c010aa5ab200/JMAS-18-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/8830577/a8439a9375b0/JMAS-18-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/8830577/c010aa5ab200/JMAS-18-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/8830577/a8439a9375b0/JMAS-18-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/8830577/c010aa5ab200/JMAS-18-1-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Pure laparoscopic versus open donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation - A systematic review and meta-analysis.成人活体肝移植中单纯腹腔镜与开放供体肝切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;18(1):1-11. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_103_21.
2
Left Lobe First With Purely Laparoscopic Approach: A Novel Strategy to Maximize Donor Safety in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation.左外叶优先纯腹腔镜入路:最大限度提高成人活体肝移植供者安全性的新策略。
Ann Surg. 2023 Oct 1;278(4):479-488. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005988. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Hepatectomy With/Without Fluorescence-Assisted Technology and Conventional Open Procedure: A Retrospective Study in Mainland China.采用/不采用荧光辅助技术的单纯腹腔镜活体供肝切除术与传统开放手术:中国大陆的一项回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2021 Dec 13;8:771250. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.771250. eCollection 2021.
4
Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy of living donor is feasible and safe: a preliminary comparative study in China.纯腹腔镜活体右半肝切除术在中国是可行和安全的:初步对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4614-4623. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6214-0. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
The First Comparative Study of the Perioperative Outcomes Between Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy and Laparoscopy-Assisted Donor Hepatectomy in a Single Institution.单中心纯腹腔镜供肝切除术与腹腔镜辅助供肝切除术的围手术期结局的首次比较研究。
Transplantation. 2017 Jul;101(7):1628-1636. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001675.
6
Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy: A Multicenter Experience.单纯腹腔镜供肝切除术:多中心经验。
Liver Transpl. 2021 Jan;27(1):67-76. doi: 10.1002/lt.25848. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
7
Insights from Seoul National University Hospital's experience: a systematic review of pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy progression.首尔国立大学医院经验之见解:纯腹腔镜供体肝切除术进展的系统评价
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Apr 3;13(2):293-300. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-239. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
8
Minimally Invasive Donors Right Hepatectomy versus Open Donors Right Hepatectomy: A Meta-Analysis.微创供体右半肝切除术与开放供体右半肝切除术:一项Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 17;12(8):2904. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082904.
9
Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Hepatectomy Including the Middle Hepatic Vein for Living Donor Liver Transplantation.纯腹腔镜与开腹左半肝切除术联合中肝静脉用于活体肝移植。
Liver Transpl. 2020 Mar;26(3):370-378. doi: 10.1002/lt.25697. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
10
Laparoscopy-assisted versus open and pure laparoscopic approach for liver resection and living donor hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助与开放及单纯腹腔镜途径用于肝切除和活体供肝肝切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Aug;20(8):687-694. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.02.379. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Donors Right Hepatectomy versus Open Donors Right Hepatectomy: A Meta-Analysis.微创供体右半肝切除术与开放供体右半肝切除术:一项Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 17;12(8):2904. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082904.

本文引用的文献

1
Expert Consensus Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation From Innovation to Implementation: A Joint Initiative From the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA).微创供肝切取用于活体肝移植的专家共识指南:从创新到实施:国际腹腔镜肝脏学会(ILLS)和亚太肝脏病学、胆胰学和肝脏移植学会(A-PHPBA)的联合倡议。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):96-108. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004475.
2
Influence of Large Grafts Weighing ≥ 1000 g on Outcome of Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy.> 重量≥1000g 的大供肝对纯腹腔镜供肝右切除术效果的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Aug;25(8):1980-1988. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04837-7. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
3
Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy: A Multicenter Experience.单纯腹腔镜供肝切除术:多中心经验。
Liver Transpl. 2021 Jan;27(1):67-76. doi: 10.1002/lt.25848. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
4
Robotic Versus Open Right Lobe Donor Hepatectomy for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与开放性右半肝供肝切取术在成人活体肝移植中的应用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Liver Transpl. 2020 Nov;26(11):1455-1464. doi: 10.1002/lt.25820. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Timing for Introduction of Total Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy; Initial Experience Based on the Data of Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy.全腹腔镜活体供肝右叶切除术的引入时机;基于腹腔镜肝切除术数据的初步经验。
Transplantation. 2021 Jun 1;105(6):1273-1279. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003344.
6
Influence of Body Mass Index ≥30 on Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy.体质指数(BMI)≥30 对纯腹腔镜右半肝供肝切取术的影响。
Ann Transplant. 2020 Jun 2;25:e923094. doi: 10.12659/AOT.923094.
7
Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy in Live Liver Donors: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.纯腹腔镜与开腹右半肝切除术在活体肝供者中的应用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e206-e212. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003914.
8
Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An International, Multi-institutional Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy and Early Outcomes.微创供肝切除术在成人活体肝移植中的应用:一项国际多机构安全性、有效性和早期结果的评估。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):166-174. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003852.
9
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between pure laparoscopic surgery and open right hepatectomy in living donor hepatectomy: Propensity score matching analysis.活体肝移植中单纯腹腔镜手术与开腹右半肝切除术围手术期结局的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5314. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62289-0.
10
Pure 3D laparoscopy versus open right hemihepatectomy in a donor with type II and III portal vein variations.纯3D腹腔镜手术与开放右半肝切除术治疗门静脉Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型变异供体的比较
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019 Nov;23(4):313-318. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.4.313. Epub 2019 Nov 29.