Mackenzie Evangelical Faculty of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
University Evangelical Mackenzie Hospital, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2022 Jan 5;34(3):e1587. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020210003e1587. eCollection 2022.
The physiological stress of critically ill patients can trigger several complications, including digestive bleeding due to stress ulcers (DBSU). The use of acid secretion suppressants to reduce their incidence has become widely used, but with the current understanding of the risks of these drugs, their use, as prophylaxis in critically ill patients, is limited to the patients with established risk factors.
To determine the appropriateness of the use of prophylaxis for stress ulcer bleeding in acutely ill patients admitted to intensive care units and to analyze the association of risk factors with adherence to the prophylaxis guideline.
Retrospective, analytical study carried out in three general adult intensive care units. Electronic medical records were analyzed for epidemiological data, risk factors for DBSU, use of stress ulcer prophylaxis, occurrence of any digestive bleeding and confirmed DBSU. The daily analysis of risk factors and prophylaxis use were in accordance with criteria based on the Guidelines of the Portuguese Society of Intensive Care for stress ulcer prophylaxis.
One hundred and five patients were included. Of the patient days with the opportunity to prescribe prophylaxis, compliance was observed in 95.1%. Of the prescription days, 82.35% were considered to be of appropriate use. Overt digestive bleeding occurred in 3.81% of those included. The occurrence of confirmed DBSU was identified at 0.95%. Multivariate analysis by logistic regression did not identify risk factors independently associated with adherence to the guideline, but identified risk factors with a negative association, which were spinal cord injury (OR 0.02 p <0.01) and shock (OR 0.36 p=0.024).
The present study showed a high rate of adherence to stress ulcer prophylaxis, but with inappropriate use still significant. In the indication of prophylaxis, attention should be paid to patients with spinal cord injury and in shock.
危重病患者的生理应激可引发多种并发症,包括应激性溃疡(DBSU)导致的消化道出血。使用胃酸分泌抑制剂来降低其发生率已被广泛应用,但鉴于这些药物的风险,目前将其作为预防措施用于危重病患者时,仅限于存在既定危险因素的患者。
确定在入住重症监护病房的急性病患者中使用应激性溃疡预防药物的合理性,并分析危险因素与遵循预防指南之间的相关性。
在三家成人综合重症监护病房进行回顾性分析性研究。对电子病历进行分析,以获取流行病学数据、DBSU 的危险因素、应激性溃疡预防药物的使用、任何消化道出血的发生情况以及确诊的 DBSU。每日对危险因素和预防药物的使用情况进行分析,以符合基于葡萄牙重症监护学会应激性溃疡预防指南的标准。
共纳入 105 例患者。在有机会进行预防药物处方的患者日中,观察到的依从率为 95.1%。在处方日中,82.35%被认为是合理的使用。纳入患者中有 3.81%发生显性消化道出血。确诊 DBSU 的发生率为 0.95%。通过逻辑回归多变量分析未发现与遵循指南独立相关的危险因素,但确定了与遵循指南呈负相关的危险因素,即脊髓损伤(OR 0.02,p <0.01)和休克(OR 0.36,p=0.024)。
本研究显示应激性溃疡预防药物的使用率较高,但仍存在不合理使用的情况。在进行预防药物的指示时,应注意脊髓损伤和休克患者。