Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Mar;32(1):37-42. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20200007. Epub 2020 May 8.
To evaluate adherence to the stress ulcer prophylaxis protocol in critically ill patients at a tertiary university hospital.
In this prospective cohort study, we included all adult patients admitted to the medical and surgical intensive care units of an academic tertiary hospital. Our sole exclusion criterion was upper gastrointestinal bleeding at intensive care unit admission. We collected baseline variables and stress ulcer prophylaxis indications according to the institutional protocol and use of prophylaxis. Our primary outcome was adherence to the stress ulcer prophylaxis protocol. Secondary outcomes were appropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis, upper gastrointestinal bleeding incidence and factors associated with appropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis.
Two hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled from July 2nd through July 31st, 2018. Patients were 52 ± 20 years old, 125 (53%) were surgical patients, and the mean SAPS 3 was 52 ± 20. In the longitudinal follow-up, 1499 patient-days were studied; 1069 patient-days had stress ulcer prophylaxis indications, and 777 patient-days contained prophylaxis use (73% stress ulcer prophylaxis protocol adherence). Of the 430 patient-days without stress ulcer prophylaxis indications, 242 involved prophylaxis (56% inappropriate stress ulcer prophylaxis use). The overall appropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis was 64%. Factors associated with proper stress ulcer prophylaxis prescription were mechanical ventilation OR 2.13 (95%CI 1.64 - 2.75) and coagulopathy OR 2.77 (95%CI 1.66 - 4.60). The upper gastrointestinal bleeding incidence was 12.8%.
Adherence to the stress ulcer prophylaxis protocol was low and inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis was frequent in this cohort of critically ill patients.
评估一所三级大学医院重症患者应激性溃疡预防方案的依从性。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们纳入了所有入住我院内科和外科重症监护病房的成年患者。我们唯一的排除标准是入住重症监护病房时存在上消化道出血。我们根据院内预防方案和预防措施收集了基线变量和应激性溃疡预防指征。主要结局是应激性溃疡预防方案的依从性。次要结局是应激性溃疡预防的合理使用、上消化道出血发生率以及与应激性溃疡预防合理使用相关的因素。
2018 年 7 月 2 日至 7 月 31 日期间,共纳入了 234 名患者。患者的年龄为 52±20 岁,125 名(53%)为外科患者,SAPS 3 平均为 52±20。在纵向随访中,共研究了 1499 个患者日;1069 个患者日存在应激性溃疡预防指征,777 个患者日包含预防措施的使用(73%的应激性溃疡预防方案依从性)。在没有应激性溃疡预防指征的 430 个患者日中,有 242 个涉及预防措施(56%的应激性溃疡预防不合理使用)。应激性溃疡预防的总体合理使用率为 64%。与正确使用应激性溃疡预防方案相关的因素是机械通气 OR 2.13(95%CI 1.64-2.75)和凝血障碍 OR 2.77(95%CI 1.66-4.60)。上消化道出血发生率为 12.8%。
在该重症患者队列中,应激性溃疡预防方案的依从性较低,应激性溃疡预防的不合理使用较为频繁。