Service d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble Alpes (Grenoble Alps University Hospital), Grenoble, France.
CNRS, UMR 5525 Translationnal innovation in Medicine and Complexity, Université Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France.
Transfus Med. 2022 Apr;32(2):175-177. doi: 10.1111/tme.12848. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
To evaluate the impact of pathogen-reduced (PR) platelet transfusions on blood products requirement for clinical practice.
PR platelets are increasing in use as standard blood products. However, few randomised trials have evaluated their impact on bleeding control or prevention. Furthermore, PR platelets recirculate less than untreated platelets.
A subgroup study of the randomised clinical trial EFFIPAP compared three arms of platelet preparations (PR: P-PRP/PAS, additive solution: P-PAS and plasma P-P arms respectively). The subgroup of acute leukaemia patients, in their chemotherapy induction phase, included 392 patients (133 P-PRP/PAS arm, 132 P-PAS arm and 130 P-P arm). Blood requirements were analysed across over periods of 7 days.
The number of platelet transfusions per week was significantly higher in the P-PRP/PAS group 2.3 [1.6-3.3] compared to the control groups 1.9 [1.3-2.8] and 2.0 [1.3-3.0] for P-P and P-PAS groups respectively (p < 0.0001). However, the total number of platelets transfused per week was not different. The number of red blood cell concentrates (RBC) transfusion per week did not differ either.
In a homogeneous group of patients, platelet pathogen reduction resulted in an increased number of platelet units transfused per week while having no impact on the total number of platelets transfused or the number of RBC transfusion; resulting to an average requirement of 2 RBC and 2-3 platelets transfusions per week of marrow aplasia.
评估减病原体(PR)血小板输注对临床血液制品需求的影响。
PR 血小板作为标准血液制品的应用越来越多。然而,很少有随机试验评估其对出血控制或预防的影响。此外,PR 血小板的再循环量低于未处理的血小板。
随机临床试验 EFFIPAP 的亚组研究比较了血小板制剂的三个手臂(PR:P-PRP/PAS、添加剂溶液:P-PAS 和血浆 P-P 手臂)。急性白血病患者亚组在化疗诱导期包括 392 名患者(133 名 P-PRP/PAS 手臂、132 名 P-PAS 手臂和 130 名 P-P 手臂)。分析了 7 天以上的血液需求。
与对照组 1.9 [1.3-2.8]和 2.0 [1.3-3.0]相比,P-PRP/PAS 组每周血小板输注次数显著更高,为 2.3 [1.6-3.3](p<0.0001)。然而,每周输注的血小板总数没有差异。每周红细胞浓缩物(RBC)输注的数量也没有差异。
在同质患者群体中,血小板病原体减少导致每周输注的血小板单位数量增加,而对输注的血小板总数或 RBC 输注数量没有影响;骨髓再生不良患者每周平均需要 2 单位 RBC 和 2-3 单位血小板输注。