• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者导向型护理和居民生活质量:领导力和组织因素如何影响成功。

Consumer Directed Care and Resident Quality of Life: How Leadership and Organizational Factors Impact on Success.

机构信息

Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.

Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

出版信息

J Gerontol Soc Work. 2022 Aug-Sep;65(6):678-689. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2021.2025185. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1080/01634372.2021.2025185
PMID:35019829
Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated inconsistency in the effectiveness of staff training programs in consumer directed care (CDC) as a means of enhancing the quality of life (QoL) of residents. The aim of this study was to investigate why this might be the case. We analyzed disaggregated cluster-by-cluster resident QoL outcomes after nursing home staff completed a CDC training program. In total, 33 nursing homes (11 clusters) participated in the study. As with previous studies, the outcomes across nursing homes were inconsistent - QoL improved at some sites but at many it remained stable or declined. Analysis of facilitator notes from the most and least successful clusters indicated that a lack of organizational support, for both the training and subsequent practice of CDC, was potentially the key barrier to effective implementation of training and so improvement in resident QoL. These findings demonstrate that all levels of aged care organizations - on the floor staff, managers and senior staff - need to fully support a CDC model of care to optimize outcomes for residents. Staff require training in CDC as well as long-term culture change within the nursing home so that training can be translated into practice.

摘要

先前的研究表明,员工培训计划在消费者导向护理(CDC)方面的效果并不一致,无法有效提升居民的生活质量(QoL)。本研究旨在探讨造成这种情况的原因。我们分析了护理人员完成 CDC 培训计划后,按护理院分组的居民 QoL 结果。共有 33 家护理院(11 个组)参与了这项研究。与先前的研究一样,各护理院的结果并不一致——有些地方的 QoL 有所提高,但在许多地方,其 QoL 保持稳定或下降。对最成功和最不成功的两组的协调员记录进行分析后发现,缺乏对培训和随后实施 CDC 的组织支持,可能是培训有效实施以及居民 QoL 改善的关键障碍。这些发现表明,老年人护理组织的各个层面——包括基层员工、管理人员和高级员工——都需要全面支持 CDC 护理模式,以优化居民的护理效果。员工需要接受 CDC 培训,还需要在护理院内进行长期的文化变革,从而将培训转化为实践。

相似文献

1
Consumer Directed Care and Resident Quality of Life: How Leadership and Organizational Factors Impact on Success.消费者导向型护理和居民生活质量:领导力和组织因素如何影响成功。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2022 Aug-Sep;65(6):678-689. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2021.2025185. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
2
An evaluation of a consumer directed care training program for nursing home staff.养老护理员主导的照护培训计划评估。
Geriatr Nurs. 2022 Jan-Feb;43:227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
3
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a staff training program to implement consumer directed care on resident quality of life in residential aged care.一项评价员工培训计划对实施居民导向型护理以提高居民生活质量的效果的随机对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Nov 23;18(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0966-1.
4
Consumer directed care in residential aged care: an evaluation of a staff training program.消费者导向的住宅老年护理:一项员工培训计划的评估。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Apr;24(4):673-678. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1574711. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
5
Real World Challenges in Delivering Consumer Directed Care to Enhance Nursing Home Residents' Well Being.实现消费者导向的护理以提升养老院居民幸福感所面临的现实世界的挑战。
Clin Gerontol. 2022 Oct-Dec;45(5):1226-1235. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2048286. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
6
Towards personalized care: Factors associated with the quality of life of residents with dementia in Australian rural aged care homes.迈向个性化护理:与澳大利亚农村老年护理院痴呆居民生活质量相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233450. eCollection 2020.
7
Nursing home quality, cost, staffing, and staff mix.养老院的质量、成本、人员配备及人员构成
Gerontologist. 2004 Feb;44(1):24-38. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.1.24.
8
Process evaluation of an implementation study in dementia care (EIT-4-BPSD): stakeholder perspectives.实施研究在痴呆症护理中的过程评估(EIT-4-BPSD):利益相关者的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07001-2.
9
Is Variation in Resident-Centered Care and Quality Performance Related to Health System Factors in Veterans Health Administration Nursing Homes?以患者为中心的护理及质量绩效的差异与退伍军人健康管理局疗养院的卫生系统因素有关吗?
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018787031. doi: 10.1177/0046958018787031.
10
Evaluation of the 'Ladder to the Moon, Culture Change Studio Engagement Programme' staff training: Two quasi-experimental case studies.评价“月亮梯,文化变革工作室参与计划”员工培训:两项准实验案例研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2017 Sep;12(3). doi: 10.1111/opn.12147. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.影响老年护理创新实施的因素:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Dec 29;22(1):61-80. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407.