Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Victoria, AUSTRALIA.
Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 May 1;54(5):841-850. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002858. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
Understanding strength changes with resistance training is important in human performance. It also enables better understanding into the expected magnitude of strength increase and factors that influence this change over time.
Squat, bench press, and deadlift scores were collated from 407 powerlifting meets (n = 1896 unique competitors: ~625 females, ~1270 males) between 2003 and 2018. Absolute (in kilograms) and relative starting strength (in kilograms per body weight) for each lift type was expressed for both sexes. Maximum and overall strength gain per day and per year (in kilograms) was calculated by comparing first and final, or maximum scores for each lift, respectively, and considered based on strength quartile classification. Paired and independent t-tests compared strength changes from baseline and between sexes. One-way ANOVAs compared strength changes between quartiles. Pearson correlations assessed relationships between strength changes over time, and baseline strength, number of competitions, and total days competing.
Maximum strength adaptations were greater for squat (20.2-25.4 kg·yr-1) and deadlift (18.1-21.1 kg·yr-1) compared with bench press (10.5-12.8 kg·yr-1, P ≤ 0.001). However, the change in absolute (all lifts: P = 0.247-0.379) and relative strength (all lifts: P = 0.641-0.821) did not differ between sexes. For females, maximum strength gain per day did not differ by quartile (all lifts: P = 0.091-0.746), nor did overall strength gain per day (P = 0.151-0.575). Conversely, males in the fourth quartile generally displayed lower maximum and overall strength gain per day.
These findings show differences in strength gain between upper- and lower-body lifts, but not sex differences in the change in strength. In line with previous research, the strongest males likely gain strength more slowly than weaker counterparts. Professionals should consider this information in the training, assessment, and long-term benchmarking of athletes whose sports require a focus on muscular strength.
了解抗阻训练中力量的变化对于人类表现至关重要。它还能让我们更好地理解预期的力量增长幅度,以及随着时间的推移影响这种变化的因素。
收集了 2003 年至 2018 年间 407 场力量举比赛(1896 名独特参赛者:约 625 名女性,约 1270 名男性)的深蹲、卧推和硬拉成绩。分别为两种性别表达了每种举重类型的绝对(公斤)和相对起始力量(公斤/体重)。通过比较每个举重的第一和最后一次(或最大)分数,分别计算了每天和每年(公斤)的最大和总体力量增益,并根据力量四分位分类进行了考虑。配对和独立 t 检验比较了基线和性别之间的力量变化。单向方差分析比较了四分位之间的力量变化。皮尔逊相关评估了随时间变化的力量之间的关系,以及基线力量、比赛次数和总比赛天数。
深蹲(20.2-25.4 公斤·年-1)和硬拉(18.1-21.1 公斤·年-1)的最大力量适应性大于卧推(10.5-12.8 公斤·年-1,P ≤ 0.001)。然而,绝对(所有举重:P = 0.247-0.379)和相对力量(所有举重:P = 0.641-0.821)的变化在性别之间没有差异。对于女性,最大力量日增益因四分位不同而不同(所有举重:P = 0.091-0.746),日总力量增益也不同(P = 0.151-0.575)。相反,第四四分位的男性通常表现出较低的最大和日总力量增益。
这些发现表明,上半身和下半身举重之间的力量增长存在差异,但在力量变化方面没有性别差异。与之前的研究一致,最强壮的男性可能比较弱的男性获得力量的速度更慢。专业人员在对运动员进行训练、评估和长期基准测试时,应该考虑到这一信息,这些运动员的运动需要专注于肌肉力量。