Infantino Maria, Nagy Eszter, Bizzaro Nicola, Fischer Katarzyna, Bossuyt Xavier, Damoiseaux Jan
Immunology and Allergy Laboratory, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy.
National Institute of Locomotor Diseases and Disabilities, Budapest, Hungary.
J Transl Autoimmun. 2021 Dec 28;5:100139. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100139. eCollection 2022.
Anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies play an important role in the diagnosis, classification and management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disease characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations and a wide range of autoantibodies, which makes the diagnosis quite challenging. In the absence of diagnostic criteria, classification criteria have been used for many decades. The first classification criteria for SLE were formulated in 1971 by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), followed by two revisions in 1982 and 1997. In order to improve their clinical performance and to reflect new knowledge on autoantibodies, new classification criteria for SLE were issued in 2012 by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC). These criteria proposed to classify only patients that have at least one immunologic criterion, overcoming SLE classification based solely on clinical manifestations. In 2019, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR proposed new criteria that aimed to maintain the high specificity of the ACR criteria with a sensitivity close to the SLICC 2012 criteria. These 2019 criteria reinforced the importance of autoantibodies in SLE diagnosis, assigning the highest score (6 points) to anti-dsDNA antibodies in the fully weighted scoring of the disease. The current criteria require the use of an anti-dsDNA assay with at least 90% specificity, such as the immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) or FARR assay. However, the criteria do not comment on all the tests currently widely used in clinical laboratories. Neither do they consider the technological evolutions, nor standardization issues. Since strict adherence to any of the classification criteria, including the serological items, could lead to possible misclassification of SLE and/or delayed diagnosis, test characteristics of the distinct immunoassays should be taken into consideration.
抗双链DNA(dsDNA)抗体在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的诊断、分类和管理中起着重要作用。SLE是一种自身免疫性疾病,临床表现多样,自身抗体种类繁多,这使得诊断颇具挑战性。在缺乏诊断标准的情况下,分类标准已使用了数十年。SLE的首个分类标准由美国风湿病学会(ACR)于1971年制定,随后在1982年和1997年进行了两次修订。为了提高其临床实用性并反映自身抗体的新知识,系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心(SLICC)于2012年发布了SLE的新分类标准。这些标准提议仅对至少有一项免疫学标准的患者进行分类,克服了仅基于临床表现的SLE分类方法。2019年,欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)/ACR提出了新的标准,旨在保持ACR标准的高特异性,同时敏感性接近SLICC 2012标准。这些2019年的标准强化了自身抗体在SLE诊断中的重要性,在该疾病的完全加权评分中,抗dsDNA抗体被赋予最高分(6分)。当前的标准要求使用特异性至少为90%的抗dsDNA检测方法,如免疫荧光试验(CLIFT)或FARR检测法。然而,这些标准并未对临床实验室目前广泛使用的所有检测方法进行评价。它们既没有考虑技术的发展,也没有考虑标准化问题。由于严格遵循任何分类标准,包括血清学项目,都可能导致SLE的误诊和/或诊断延迟,因此应考虑不同免疫检测方法的检测特性。