• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公司治理、环境可持续性绩效与国家文化的规范同构力量。

Corporate governance, environmental sustainability performance, and normative isomorphic force of national culture.

作者信息

Peng Xuhui, Zhang Ruru

机构信息

Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, 39 South College Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.

School of Economics and Management, Hanshan Normal University, Qiao Dong, Chaozhou City, Guangdong, 515633, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(22):33443-33473. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18603-6. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-18603-6
PMID:35031997
Abstract

With the increasing concern regarding climate change, academics and practitioners are devoting attention to corporate environmental sustainability development. However, corporate environmental responsibility as an outcome of corporate governance (CG) practice is also constrained by national culture as an institutional factor, and research on the relationship between CG and environmental sustainability performance (ESP) with consideration for national culture remains scarce. Therefore, this study investigates the ESP data of Forbes' listed multinational corporations (MNCs) through content analysis and applies STATA software with stepwise regression models to empirically test the relationship between CG and MNCs' ESP and the moderating effects of national culture on this relationship. The results show that board independence and board size positively affect MNCs' ESP, and the relationship between board independence and MNCs' ESP is negatively moderated by masculinity and uncertainty avoidance. Our results emphasize the importance of CG in environmental decision-making by board management supervision enhancement and explain how national culture affects ESP because of its influence on CG. Our study explains the agency effect of board composition on MNCs' environmental sustainability development and the influence of national culture, which establishes a link between CG, ESP, and national culture. Moreover, policymakers and MNCs' suggestions for enhancing ESP through CG measures, while considering national culture, are also provided.

摘要

随着对气候变化的关注度不断提高,学者和从业者都在关注企业环境可持续发展。然而,作为公司治理(CG)实践结果的企业环境责任也受到作为制度因素的国家文化的制约,考虑到国家文化的情况下,关于公司治理与环境可持续发展绩效(ESP)之间关系的研究仍然很少。因此,本研究通过内容分析调查了《福布斯》上市跨国公司(MNC)的ESP数据,并应用带有逐步回归模型的STATA软件实证检验公司治理与跨国公司ESP之间的关系以及国家文化对这种关系的调节作用。结果表明,董事会独立性和董事会规模对跨国公司的ESP有积极影响,而男性气质和不确定性规避对董事会独立性与跨国公司ESP之间的关系有负向调节作用。我们的研究结果强调了通过加强董事会管理监督,公司治理在环境决策中的重要性,并解释了国家文化如何因其对公司治理的影响而影响ESP。我们的研究解释了董事会构成对跨国公司环境可持续发展的代理效应以及国家文化的影响,这在公司治理、ESP和国家文化之间建立了联系。此外,还为政策制定者和跨国公司提供了在考虑国家文化的情况下,通过公司治理措施提高ESP的建议。

相似文献

1
Corporate governance, environmental sustainability performance, and normative isomorphic force of national culture.公司治理、环境可持续性绩效与国家文化的规范同构力量。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(22):33443-33473. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18603-6. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
2
The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Association of Internal Corporate Governance and Profitability; Evidence from Pakistan.企业社会责任在内部公司治理与盈利能力关联中的调节作用;来自巴基斯坦的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 28;18(11):5830. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115830.
3
Which internal corporate governance mechanisms drive corporate sustainability?哪些内部公司治理机制推动了企业的可持续发展?
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113780. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113780. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
4
Assessing Influence Mechanism of Management Overconfidence, Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Corporate Value: The Moderating Effect of Government Environmental Governance and Media Attention.评估管理层过度自信、企业环境责任和企业价值的影响机制:政府环境治理和媒体关注的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):577. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010577.
5
Corporate Social Responsibility Activities and Green Innovation Performance in Organizations: Do Managerial Environmental Concerns and Green Absorptive Capacity Matter?组织中的企业社会责任活动与绿色创新绩效:管理环境关切和绿色吸收能力重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 7;13:938682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938682. eCollection 2022.
6
Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach.印度尼西亚的良好公司治理与公司可持续发展绩效:一种三重底线方法。
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 13;7(3):e06453. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06453. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
The role of internal auditing on corporate governance: its effects of economic and environmental performance.内部审计在公司治理中的作用:对经济和环境绩效的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(52):112877-112891. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30363-5. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
8
Do corporate governance mechanisms curb the anti-environmental behavior of firms worldwide? An illustration through waste management.公司治理机制是否能遏制全球企业的反环境行为?以废物管理为例。
J Environ Manage. 2022 May 15;310:114707. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114707. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
9
Scaling up the transition: The role of corporate governance mechanisms in promoting circular economy strategies.规模化转型:公司治理机制在推动循环经济战略中的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jan 1;349:119544. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119544. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
10
Does Environmental, Social, and Governance Drive the Sustainability of Multinational Corporation's Subsidiaries? Evidence From Korea.环境、社会和治理因素推动跨国公司子公司的可持续发展吗?来自韩国的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 13;13:899936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899936. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Corporate governance, technological innovation, and corporate performance: Evidence from China.公司治理、技术创新与公司绩效:来自中国的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 May 16;10(11):e31459. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31459. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
2
Effects of country success on COVID-19 cumulative cases and excess deaths in 169 countries.国家成功对169个国家新冠病毒累计病例数和超额死亡人数的影响。
Ecol Indic. 2022 Apr;137:108703. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108703. Epub 2022 Feb 25.