• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品成分和产品甜味的法规符合性测量挑战:科学意见。

The Challenge of Measuring Sweet Taste in Food Ingredients and Products for Regulatory Compliance: A Scientific Opinion.

机构信息

Abbott Nutrition, 3300 Stelzer Rd, Columbus, OH 43219, USA.

Abbott Nutrition, 1800 South Oak St, Suite 210 Champaign, IL61820, USA.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2022 Mar 15;105(2):333-345. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsac005.

DOI:10.1093/jaoacint/qsac005
PMID:35040962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8924649/
Abstract

The Codex Alimentarius Commission, a central part of the joint Food and Agricultural Organization/World Health Organizations Food Standards Program, adopts internationally recognized standards, guidelines, and code of practices that help ensure safety, quality, and fairness of food trade globally. Although Codex standards are not regulations per se, regulatory authorities around the world may benchmark against these standards or introduce them into regulations within their countries. Recently, the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) initiated a draft revision to the Codex standard for follow-up formula (FUF), a drink/product (with added nutrients) for young children, to include requirements for limiting or measuring the amount of sweet taste contributed by carbohydrates in a product. Stakeholders from multiple food and beverage manufacturers expressed concern about the subjectivity of sweetness and challenges with objective measurement for verifying regulatory compliance. It is a requirement that Codex standards include a reference to a suitable method of analysis for verifying compliance with the standard. In response, AOAC INTERNATIONAL formed the Ad Hoc Expert Panel on Sweetness in November 2020 to review human perception of sweet taste, assess the landscape of internationally recognized analytical and sensory methods for measuring sweet taste in food ingredients and products, deliver recommendations to Codex regarding verification of sweet taste requirements for FUF, and develop a scientific opinion on measuring sweet taste in food and beverage products beyond FUF. Findings showed an abundance of official analytical methods for determining quantities of carbohydrates and other sweet-tasting molecules in food products and beverages, but no analytical methods capable of determining sweet taste. Furthermore, sweet taste can be determined by standard sensory analysis methods. However, it is impossible to define a sensory intensity reference value for sweetness, making them unfit to verify regulatory compliance for the purpose of international food trade. Based on these findings and recommendations, the Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling agreed during its 41st session in May 2021 to inform CCNFSDU that there are no known validated methods to measure sweetness of carbohydrate sources; therefore, no way to determine compliance for such a requirement for FUF.

摘要

食品法典委员会是粮农组织/世界卫生组织食品标准联合计划的一个核心部分,它通过国际认可的标准、准则和操作规范来帮助确保全球食品贸易的安全、质量和公平性。尽管食品法典标准本身并不是法规,但世界各地的监管机构可能会以这些标准为基准,或者在其本国的法规中引入这些标准。最近,食品法典委员会营养和特殊膳食用食品法典标准委员会(CCNFSDU)启动了修订后续配方(FUF)食品法典标准的草案,FUF 是一种为幼儿提供的饮料/产品(添加了营养物质),其中包括限制或测量产品中碳水化合物产生的甜味的要求。来自多家食品和饮料制造商的利益相关者对甜味的主观性和验证法规遵从性的客观测量表示关注。食品法典标准的要求包括引用一种合适的分析方法来验证标准的遵守情况。作为回应,AOAC 国际于 2020 年 11 月成立了甜味问题特别专家小组,以审查人类对甜味的感知,评估国际上公认的测量食品成分和产品中甜味的分析和感官方法,就 FUF 的甜味要求向食品法典提出建议,并就 FUF 以外的食品和饮料产品中的甜味测量制定科学意见。调查结果表明,有大量的官方分析方法可用于确定食品和饮料产品中碳水化合物和其他甜味分子的数量,但没有能够确定甜味的分析方法。此外,甜味可以通过标准的感官分析方法来确定。然而,无法为甜味确定一个感官强度参考值,因此不适合用于验证国际食品贸易的法规遵从性。基于这些调查结果和建议,食品法典分析方法和采样委员会在 2021 年 5 月第 41 届会议上同意告知 CCNFSDU,目前没有已知的经过验证的方法来测量碳水化合物来源的甜度;因此,无法确定 FUF 中此类要求的合规性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708a/8924649/121b04b249de/qsac005f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708a/8924649/503ba0a0bbab/qsac005f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708a/8924649/121b04b249de/qsac005f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708a/8924649/503ba0a0bbab/qsac005f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708a/8924649/121b04b249de/qsac005f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Challenge of Measuring Sweet Taste in Food Ingredients and Products for Regulatory Compliance: A Scientific Opinion.食品成分和产品甜味的法规符合性测量挑战:科学意见。
J AOAC Int. 2022 Mar 15;105(2):333-345. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsac005.
2
The Politics of Regulating Foods for Infants and Young Children: A Case Study on the Framing and Contestation of Codex Standard-Setting Processes on Breast-Milk Substitutes.监管婴幼儿食品的政治:以代乳品规范制定过程的框架和争议为例。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2422-2439. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.161. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
3
Study protocol of the sweet tooth study, randomized controlled trial with partial food provision on the effect of low, regular and high dietary sweetness exposure on sweetness preferences in Dutch adults.甜牙齿研究方案,部分食物提供的随机对照试验,研究低、中、高膳食甜度摄入对荷兰成年人甜味偏好的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14946-4.
4
The role of the Codex Alimentarius process in support of new products to enhance the nutritional health of infants and young children.食品法典程序在支持新产品以促进婴幼儿营养健康方面的作用。
Food Nutr Bull. 2010 Jun;31(2 Suppl):S128-33. doi: 10.1177/15648265100312S205.
5
Compositional requirements of follow-up formula for use in infancy: recommendations of an international expert group coordinated by the Early Nutrition Academy.婴幼儿后续配方食品的成分要求:由早期营养学会协调的国际专家组的建议。
Ann Nutr Metab. 2013;62(1):44-54. doi: 10.1159/000345906. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
6
Perspective: Measuring Sweetness in Foods, Beverages, and Diets: Toward Understanding the Role of Sweetness in Health.观点:测量食品、饮料和饮食中的甜度:了解甜度在健康中的作用。
Adv Nutr. 2021 Mar 31;12(2):343-354. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa151.
7
Baby food industry interference with infant feeding international regulation-A case study on the standard for follow-up formula.婴儿食品行业对婴幼儿喂养国际法规的干扰——以后续配方标准为例
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 22;10:984385. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.984385. eCollection 2022.
8
The origins of a global standard for food quality and safety: Codex Alimentarius Austriacus and FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius.全球食品质量与安全标准的起源:《奥地利食品法典》与粮农组织/世界卫生组织《食品法典》。
Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2012 Jun;82(3):223-7. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000115.
9
Codex recommendations on the scientific basis of health claims.食品法典委员会关于健康声称科学依据的建议。
Eur J Nutr. 2009 Dec;48 Suppl 1:S15-22. doi: 10.1007/s00394-009-0077-z.
10
Sweet taste exposure and the subsequent acceptance and preference for sweet taste in the diet: systematic review of the published literature.甜味剂暴露与随后对饮食中甜味的接受和偏好:已发表文献的系统评价。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Mar 1;107(3):405-419. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx031.

引用本文的文献

1
Sweetness Ratings of U.S. Infant Formulas.美国婴儿配方奶粉的甜度评级。
Nutrients. 2025 Aug 11;17(16):2602. doi: 10.3390/nu17162602.
2
Research on commercial milk formulas for young children: A scoping review.婴幼儿商业配方奶粉研究:范围综述。
Matern Child Nutr. 2024 Oct;20(4):e13675. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13675. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Functionality of Sugars in Foods and Health.食品与健康中糖类的功能
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016 May;15(3):433-470. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12194.
2
Effect of physiological factors, pathologies, and acquired habits on the sweet taste threshold: A systematic review and meta-analysis.生理因素、病理学和习得习惯对甜味阈值的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020 Nov;19(6):3755-3773. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12643. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
3
Perspective: Measuring Sweetness in Foods, Beverages, and Diets: Toward Understanding the Role of Sweetness in Health.
观点:测量食品、饮料和饮食中的甜度:了解甜度在健康中的作用。
Adv Nutr. 2021 Mar 31;12(2):343-354. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa151.
4
Carbohydrate determination in honey samples by ion chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPAEC-MS).离子色谱-质谱法(HPAEC-MS)测定蜂蜜样品中的碳水化合物。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2020 Sep;412(22):5217-5227. doi: 10.1007/s00216-020-02732-3. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
Individual Differences in Sweetness Ratings and Cross-Modal Aroma-Taste Interactions.甜度评级中的个体差异以及跨模态香气-味道相互作用。
Foods. 2020 Feb 1;9(2):146. doi: 10.3390/foods9020146.
6
Genetic Differences in Taste Receptors: Implications for the Food Industry.味觉感受器的遗传差异:对食品工业的影响。
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2020 Mar 25;11:183-204. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-032519-051653. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review.内在和外在感官因素在食品和饮料甜味感知中的作用:综述
Foods. 2019 Jun 14;8(6):211. doi: 10.3390/foods8060211.
8
The Sweet Taste of Acarbose and Maltotriose: Relative Detection and Underlying Mechanism.阿卡波糖和麦芽三糖的甜蜜味道:相对检测及潜在机制。
Chem Senses. 2019 Jan 29;44(2):123-128. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjy081.
9
A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.16 种甜味剂的心理物理剂量反应行为比较。
Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11):1632. doi: 10.3390/nu10111632.
10
Estimation of steviol glycosides in food matrices by high performance liquid chromatography.采用高效液相色谱法测定食品基质中的甜菊糖苷。
J Food Sci Technol. 2018 Aug;55(8):3325-3334. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3270-3. Epub 2018 Jun 11.