Biofilm Study Group, Department of Cell Regulatory Mechanisms, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 150 Zabolotnoho Str., 03680 Kiev, Ukraine.
Department of Dermatovenerology, Allergology, Clinical and Laboratory Immunology, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, 9 Dorohozhytska Str., 03680 Kiev, Ukraine.
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 10;23(2):731. doi: 10.3390/ijms23020731.
The choice of effective biocides used for routine hospital practice should consider the role of disinfectants in the maintenance and development of local resistome and how they might affect antibiotic resistance gene transfer within the hospital microbial population. Currently, there is little understanding of how different biocides contribute to eDNA release that may contribute to gene transfer and subsequent environmental retention. Here, we investigated how different biocides affect the release of eDNA from mature biofilms of two opportunistic model strains ATCC 27853 (PA) and ATCC 25923 (SA) and contribute to the hospital resistome in the form of surface and water contaminants and dust particles. The effect of four groups of biocides, alcohols, hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium compounds, and the polymeric biocide polyhexamethylene guanidine hydrochloride (PHMG-Cl), was evaluated using PA and SA biofilms. Most biocides, except for PHMG-Cl and 70% ethanol, caused substantial eDNA release, and PHMG-Cl was found to block biofilm development when used at concentrations of 0.5% and 0.1%. This might be associated with the formation of DNA-PHMG-Cl complexes as PHMG-Cl is predicted to bind to AT base pairs by molecular docking assays. PHMG-Cl was found to bind high-molecular DNA and plasmid DNA and continued to inactivate DNA on surfaces even after 4 weeks. PHMG-Cl also effectively inactivated biofilm-associated antibiotic resistance gene eDNA released by a pan-drug-resistant strain, which demonstrates the potential of a polymeric biocide as a new surface-active agent to combat the spread of antibiotic resistance in hospital settings.
在常规医院实践中选择有效杀生物剂时,应考虑消毒剂在维持和发展局部抗药性方面的作用,以及它们如何影响医院微生物群体中抗生素抗性基因的转移。目前,人们对不同杀生物剂如何促进可能有助于基因转移和随后在环境中保留的 eDNA 释放的了解甚少。在这里,我们研究了不同杀生物剂如何影响两种机会性病原体模型菌株 ATCC 27853(PA)和 ATCC 25923(SA)成熟生物膜中 eDNA 的释放,并以表面和水污染物以及灰尘颗粒的形式对医院抗药性进行贡献。使用 PA 和 SA 生物膜评估了四组杀生物剂(醇,过氧化氢,季铵化合物和聚合杀生物剂聚六亚甲基胍盐酸盐(PHMG-Cl))的作用。除 PHMG-Cl 和 70%乙醇外,大多数杀生物剂都导致大量 eDNA 释放,并且当使用 0.5%和 0.1%浓度的 PHMG-Cl 时,发现 PHMG-Cl 阻止生物膜的发展。这可能与 DNA-PHMG-Cl 复合物的形成有关,因为 PHMG-Cl 通过分子对接实验预测与 AT 碱基对结合。PHMG-Cl 被发现与高分子量 DNA 和质粒 DNA 结合,并在 4 周后即使在表面上仍继续使 DNA 失活。PHMG-Cl 还能有效灭活泛耐药菌株释放的与生物膜相关的抗生素抗性基因 eDNA,这表明聚合杀生物剂作为一种新型表面活性剂,有可能在医院环境中抵抗抗生素耐药性的传播。