Improving responses to safety incidents: we need to talk about justice.
作者信息
Cribb Alan, O'Hara Jane K, Waring Justin
机构信息
Centre for Public Policy Research, King's College London, London SE1 9NH, UK
School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
出版信息
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Apr;31(4):327-330. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014333. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Improving responses to safety incidents: we need to talk about justice.提高对安全事件的应对能力：我们需要谈谈公平问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Apr;31(4):327-330. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014333. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
2
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性？对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
3
The benefits and opportunities: Engaging patients in identifying and reporting patient safety incidents.好处和机遇：让患者参与识别和报告患者安全事件。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2024 Jul;37(4):196-201. doi: 10.1177/08404704231203593. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
Imitating Incidents: How Simulation Can Improve Safety Investigation and Learning From Adverse Events.模拟事件：仿真如何改进安全调查并从不良事件中吸取教训。
Simul Healthc. 2018 Aug;13(4):227-232. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000315.
5
Learning from Taiwan patient-safety reporting system.借鉴台湾地区的患者安全报告制度。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Dec;81(12):834-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
6
Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error.通过预防医疗差错来促进患者安全。
JAMA. 1998 Oct 28;280(16):1444-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.16.1444.
7
[Current status of the "European Union Network for Patient Safety and Quality of Care (PaSQ)" Joint Action].["欧盟患者安全与医疗质量网络（PaSQ）联合行动的现状"]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(1):51-2. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
8
[Safety studies should be prioritized].安全研究应被列为优先事项。
Lakartidningen. 2007;104(4):236-7.
9
A Tool for the Concise Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents.一种用于患者安全事件简明分析的工具。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Jan;42(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42003-9.
10
Effectiveness of New Tools to Define an Up-to-Date Patient Safety Risk Map: A Primary Care Study Protocol.新工具在定义最新患者安全风险图方面的有效性：一项初级保健研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 15;18(16):8612. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168612.
引用本文的文献
1
Healthcare workers' perceptions of patient safety culture in emergency departments: a scoping review.医护人员对急诊科患者安全文化的认知：一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e097086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097086.
2
Establishing a Just Culture: Implications for the Veterans Health Administration Journey to High Reliability.建立公正文化：对退伍军人健康管理局迈向高可靠性的启示。
Fed Pract. 2024 Sep;41(9):290-297. doi: 10.12788/fp.0512. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
3
Humanizing processes after harm part 1: patient safety incident investigations, litigation and the experiences of those affected.伤害后的人性化进程 第1部分：患者安全事件调查、诉讼及受影响者的经历
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jan 3;4:1473256. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1473256. eCollection 2024.
4
Humanising processes after harm part 2: compounded harm experienced by patients and their families after safety incidents.伤害后的人性化进程 第2部分：安全事件后患者及其家属遭受的复合伤害
Front Health Serv. 2024 Dec 17;4:1473296. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1473296. eCollection 2024.
5
Cultivating the conditions for care: it's all about trust.营造关怀的条件：一切都关乎信任。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Dec 9;4:1471183. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1471183. eCollection 2024.
6
Involvement in serious incident investigations: a qualitative documentary analysis of NHS trust policies in England.参与严重事件调查：英格兰国民保健制度信托政策的定性文献分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):1207. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11626-4.
7
The Association of Organizational, Environmental, and Staffing Characteristics of Residential Care Facilities and the Risk Rating of Statutory Notifications: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ireland.爱尔兰的一项横断研究：居住护理机构的组织、环境和人员配备特征与法定通知风险评级之间的关联。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Mar 1;20(2):131-137. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001185. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
8
Improving patient safety governance and systems through learning from successes and failures: qualitative surveys and interviews with international experts.通过从成功和失败中学习来改善患者安全治理和系统：对国际专家的定性调查和访谈。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;35(4):0. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad088.
9
Videos of simulated after action reviews: a training resource to support social and inclusive learning from patient safety events.模拟行动后回顾视频：支持从患者安全事件中进行社会和包容性学习的培训资源。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jul;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002270.
10
Healthcare provider perceptions of safety culture: A multi-site study using the safety attitudes questionnaire.医疗服务提供者对安全文化的认知：一项使用安全态度问卷的多地点研究。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Jan 20;9:100228. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100228. eCollection 2023 Mar.
本文引用的文献
1
Patient Safety and the Question of Dignitary Harms.患者安全与尊严损害问题。
J Med Philos. 2023 Feb 17;48(1):33-49. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhac035.
2
Next of Kin Involvement in Regulatory Investigations of Adverse Events That Caused Patient Death: A Process Evaluation (Part I - The Next of Kin's Perspective).近亲参与导致患者死亡的不良事件监管调查：过程评估（第一部分 - 近亲视角）。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1713-e1718. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000630.
3
How to improve healthcare improvement-an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods.如何改善医疗保健——玛丽·迪克森 - 伍兹的一篇文章
BMJ. 2019 Oct 1;367:l5514. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5514.
4
What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi-site ethnographic study.个人问责制在患者安全中扮演着怎样的角色？一项多地点人种学研究。
Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Feb;38(2):216-32. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12370. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
5
Harmed patients gaining voice: challenging dominant perspectives in the construction of medical harm and patient safety reforms.受伤害的患者发出自己的声音：在构建医疗伤害和患者安全改革时挑战主导观点。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(3):510-516. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.050. Epub 2010 May 8.
6
The meaning of justice in safety incident reporting.安全事件报告中公正的意义。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(2):403-13. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.013. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
7
Beyond blame: cultural barriers to medical incident reporting.超越指责：医疗事件报告的文化障碍
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(9):1927-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.055. Epub 2004 Nov 18.
8
Understanding adverse events: human factors.理解不良事件：人为因素
Qual Health Care. 1995 Jun;4(2):80-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.2.80.
Zotero 插件