Healthcare Management, Campostaggia Hospital, Southeast Tuscany Local Health Unit, Siena, Italy.
Post Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Ann Ig. 2022 Nov-Dec;34(6):635-649. doi: 10.7416/ai.2021.2495. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
Increasing waiting times for elective surgery is a major concern for policymakers and healthcare staff in many countries, due to its effect on health, patient satisfaction and the perceived quality of health-care. Many organizational models to reduce surgical waiting times have been studied, but the international literature indicates that multidimensional interventions on different aspects of the surgical pathway can be more effective in reducing waiting times than interventions focused on optimizing a single aspect.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidimensional intervention in reducing waiting times for elective surgery.
We used a pre-post approach to evaluate the effect of a multidimensional project to reduce waiting times and lists.
In a district general hospital (Italy) with three elective surgery operating rooms open 6 hours/day, 5 days/week (surgery specialties: general surgery, orthopaedics, gynaecology and urology), a project for reducing surgery waiting times was implemented in October 2018. The project focused on three aspects: i) separation of the flow of day surgery from that of ordinary surgery; ii) increasing available operating time by reorganizing the staff; iii) allocation of operating sessions flexibly in proportion to the waiting list. Waiting times for surgery in the periods 1/10/2019-31/12/2019 and 1/10/2018-31/12/2018 were compared by t test.
Waiting times for non-high-priority cases shortened significantly for all specialities (p<0.01), ex-cept for urology. For general surgery, orthopaedics and gynaecology, mean waiting times for day surgery decreased from 198 to 100 days (-50%) and for ordinary operations from 213 to 134 days (-37%). Waiting times for high-priority cases also shortened.
Our multidimensional project based on reorganization of staff and facilities and on improved scheduling proved effective in reducing waiting times for elective surgery.
在许多国家,由于手术等待时间对健康、患者满意度和医疗服务质量的感知的影响,越来越多的决策者和医疗保健人员对择期手术的等待时间过长感到担忧。已经研究了许多减少手术等待时间的组织模型,但国际文献表明,与专注于优化单一方面的干预措施相比,针对手术路径不同方面的多维干预措施在减少等待时间方面可能更有效。
本研究旨在评估多维干预措施在减少择期手术等待时间方面的有效性。
我们使用前后对照的方法评估减少手术等待时间和清单的多维项目的效果。
在一家拥有三间开放手术的地区综合医院(意大利),每天开放 6 小时,每周开放 5 天(手术专业:普通外科、骨科、妇科和泌尿科),实施了一项减少手术等待时间的项目。该项目侧重于三个方面:i)日间手术与普通手术的流程分离;ii)通过重新组织工作人员增加可用手术时间;iii)根据等待名单灵活分配手术时间。通过 t 检验比较 2019 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日和 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间手术的等待时间。
除泌尿科外,所有专业的非高优先级病例的等待时间都显著缩短(p<0.01)。对于普通外科、骨科和妇科,日间手术的平均等待时间从 198 天减少到 100 天(减少 50%),普通手术的平均等待时间从 213 天减少到 134 天(减少 37%)。高优先级病例的等待时间也缩短了。
我们的基于工作人员和设施重组以及改进排班的多维项目在减少择期手术的等待时间方面是有效的。