Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With the All-Inside Technique: Equivalent Outcomes and Failure Rate at Three-Year Follow-Up Compared to a Doubled Semitendinosus-Gracilis Graft.

PURPOSE

To compare in terms of failure rates, clinical and functional outcomes the all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with double suspensory fixation and quadrupled semitendinosus autograft with anteromedial portal doubled semitendinosus-gracilis autograft with suspensory femoral and tibial interference screw fixation.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were sequentially allocated into two groups and followed up prospectively for a 3-year period. The first group was the all-inside group and the second was the "classic" AM portal with S-G graft. Each group comprised 22 patients. All patients underwent KT-1000 testing preoperatively and at a minimum of six months postoperatively. Visual pain analog was recorded preoperatively and during both the immediate postoperative period and throughout the follow-up. The Lysholm knee score was used comparing the preoperative and 24-month timepoints.

RESULTS

The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores showed a significant difference at two weeks (2.4 vs 1.8, p < 0.01 ) in favor of the all-inside group, but that difference disappeared in the later follow-up visits. Similarly, there was no significant difference with Lysholm knee scores at two years and the side-to-side anterior translation measured with the KT-1000. At the three-year mark, there were no failures in either of the groups.

CONCLUSION

The all-inside technique appears to be equivalent in terms of outcomes to the classic S-G technique, and given the less-invasive nature and versatility in graft choices is a safe and effective technique for primary ACL reconstruction.