Taber Christopher B, Colter Roy J, Davis Jair J, Seweje Patrick A, Wilson Dustin P, Foster Jonathan Z, Merrigan Justin J
Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT 06825, USA.
Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022 Jan 11;7(1):9. doi: 10.3390/jfmk7010009.
There has been limited research to explore the use of body tempering and when the use of this modality would be most appropriate. This study aimed to determine if a body tempering intervention would be appropriate pre-exercise by examining its effects on perceived soreness, range of motion (ROM), and force production compared to an intervention of traditional stretching. The subjects for this study were ten Division 1 (D1) football linemen from Sacred Heart University (Age: 19.9 ± 1.5 years, body mass: 130.9 ± 12.0 kg, height: 188.4 ± 5.1 cm, training age: 8.0 ± 3.5 years). Subjects participated in three sessions with the first session being baseline testing. The second and third sessions involved the participants being randomized to receive either the body tempering or stretching intervention for the second session and then receiving the other intervention the final week. Soreness using a visual analog scale (VAS), ROM, counter movement jump (CMJ) peak force and jump height, static jump (SJ) peak force and jump height, and isometric mid-thigh pull max force production were assessed. The results of the study concluded that body tempering does not have a negative effect on muscle performance but did practically reduce perceived muscle soreness. Since body tempering is effective at reducing soreness in athletes, it can be recommended for athletes as part of their pre-exercise warmup without negatively effecting isometric or dynamic force production.
关于探索身体回火疗法的应用以及该疗法何时最为适用的研究有限。本研究旨在通过考察与传统拉伸干预相比,身体回火干预对肌肉酸痛感、关节活动范围(ROM)和力量产生的影响,来确定在运动前进行身体回火干预是否合适。本研究的受试者是来自圣心大学的10名一级(D1)橄榄球进攻内锋(年龄:19.9±1.5岁,体重:130.9±12.0千克,身高:188.4±5.1厘米,训练年限:8.0±3.5年)。受试者参加了三个阶段的测试,第一阶段为基线测试。第二和第三阶段,参与者被随机分配,在第二阶段接受身体回火或拉伸干预,然后在最后一周接受另一种干预。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估酸痛感、ROM、反向纵跳(CMJ)峰值力量和跳跃高度、静态纵跳(SJ)峰值力量和跳跃高度,以及等长股中肌拉伸最大力量产生情况。研究结果表明,身体回火对肌肉表现没有负面影响,但实际上确实减轻了肌肉酸痛感。由于身体回火在减轻运动员酸痛方面有效,因此可以推荐给运动员作为运动前热身的一部分,而不会对等长或动态力量产生负面影响。