Transparency in Healthcare BV, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0261940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261940. eCollection 2022.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of various combinations of urate lowering therapy (ULT) and anti-inflammatory treatment in the management of newly diagnosed gout patients, from the Dutch societal perspective.
A probabilistic patient-level simulation estimating costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) comparing gout and hyperuricemia treatment strategies was performed. ULT options febuxostat, allopurinol and no ULT were considered. Flare treatments naproxen, colchicine, prednisone, and anakinra were considered. A Markov Model was constructed to simulate gout disease. Health states were no flare, and severe pain, mild pain, moderate pain, or no pain in the presence of a flare. Model input was derived from patient level clinical trial data, meta-analyses or from previously published health-economic evaluations. The results of probabilistic sensitivity analyses were presented using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and summarized using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs). Scenario analyses were performed.
The ICER for allopurinol versus no ULT was €1,381, when combined with naproxen. Febuxostat yielded the highest utility, but also the highest costs (€4,385 vs. €4,063 for allopurinol), resulting in an ICER of €25,173 when compared to allopurinol. No ULT was not cost-effective, yielding the lowest utility. For the gout flare medications, comparable effects on utility were achieved. Combined with febuxostat, naproxen was the cheapest option (€4,404), and anakinra the most expensive (€4,651). The ICER of anakinra compared to naproxen was €818,504. Colchicine and prednisone were dominated by naproxen.
Allopurinol and febuxostat were both cost-effective compared to No ULT. Febuxostat was cost-effective in comparison with allopurinol at higher willingness-to-pay thresholds. For treating gout flares, colchicine, naproxen and prednisone offered comparable health economic implications, although naproxen was the favoured option.
从荷兰社会角度评估降尿酸治疗(ULT)和抗炎治疗联合应用于新发痛风患者的成本效果。
使用概率性患者水平模拟方法,比较痛风和高尿酸血症治疗策略的成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。考虑了 ULT 选项非布司他、别嘌醇和不进行 ULT。考虑了 flare 治疗药物萘普生、秋水仙碱、泼尼松和阿那白滞素。构建了一个 Markov 模型来模拟痛风疾病。健康状态为无 flare 和有 flare 但无疼痛、轻度疼痛、中度疼痛或重度疼痛。模型输入源自患者水平临床试验数据、荟萃分析或先前发表的健康经济学评价。概率敏感性分析的结果以增量成本效果比(ICER)表示,并使用成本效果接受曲线(CEAC)进行总结。进行了方案分析。
当与萘普生联合使用时,别嘌醇相对于不进行 ULT 的 ICER 为 1381 欧元。非布司他产生的效用最高,但成本也最高(4385 欧元对比别嘌醇的 4063 欧元),与别嘌醇相比,ICER 为 25173 欧元。不进行 ULT 不具有成本效果,产生的效用最低。对于痛风 flare 治疗药物,联合使用时,它们在效用上的效果相当。与非布司他联合使用时,萘普生是最便宜的选择(4404 欧元),阿那白滞素是最贵的(4651 欧元)。阿那白滞素与萘普生的 ICER 为 818504 欧元。秋水仙碱和泼尼松被萘普生所主导。
与不进行 ULT 相比,别嘌醇和非布司他均具有成本效果。在较高的意愿支付阈值下,非布司他与别嘌醇相比具有成本效果。在治疗痛风 flare 方面,秋水仙碱、萘普生和泼尼松具有相当的健康经济意义,尽管萘普生是首选方案。