Suppr超能文献

检验两种版本的努力-回报付出任务(EEfRT)的可靠性和有效性。

Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT).

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0262902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262902. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) has gained validity evidence from several studies. However, various modifications have been applied to the original version, which have never been compared systematically. In Study 1, we tested 120 healthy participants to directly compare two versions of the EEfRT. In Study 2, we tested a larger sample of 394 healthy participants to further examine the original EEfRT. We replicated the split-half reliability of both task versions. However, self-reported personality traits (e.g., trait BAS) correlated with only some task performance parameters in Study 1, which did not replicate for the original EEfRT in Study 2. Our results indicate complex and sometimes inconsistent relations between different personality traits, task properties, and reward attributes.

摘要

努力-报酬任务(EEfRT)已经从多项研究中获得了有效性证据。然而,原始版本已经进行了各种修改,这些修改从未被系统地比较过。在研究 1 中,我们测试了 120 名健康参与者,以直接比较 EEfRT 的两个版本。在研究 2 中,我们测试了一个更大的 394 名健康参与者的样本,以进一步研究原始的 EEfRT。我们复制了两个任务版本的半分可靠性。然而,在研究 1 中,自我报告的人格特质(例如,特质 BAS)与任务表现参数的某些方面相关,但在研究 2 中,原始 EEfRT 并不存在这种关系。我们的结果表明,不同人格特质、任务属性和奖励属性之间存在复杂且有时不一致的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b872/8797221/5a6913b2a329/pone.0262902.g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验