• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于努力的决策和自我报告的冷漠在频繁使用大麻者和健康对照组中的表现:一项复制和扩展研究。

Effort-based decision making and self-reported apathy in frequent cannabis users and healthy controls: A replication and extension.

机构信息

School of Psychological Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2022 Mar;44(2):146-162. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2093335. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1080/13803395.2022.2093335
PMID:35767680
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

is a term used to refer to lack of motivation and passive personality related to chronic cannabis use. Given mixed findings, the current study aimed to replicate and extend previous research on frequent cannabis use, motivated behavior, and self-reported apathy.

METHOD

Cannabis users (on average, ≥3 days/week of cannabis use over the past year), and healthy controls (≤1 day/month of cannabis use over the past year) completed the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), and the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT). Repeated measures analysis of covariance was used to 1) examine the effects of group, reward magnitude, probability, and their interaction on hard task selections on the EEfRT, and 2) examine between-group differences on the AES, controlling for alcohol use and depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

There were significant main effects of reward magnitude, probability, and an interaction between reward magnitude and probability on hard task selection ('s < 0.05). Specifically, as reward magnitude and probability of winning the reward increased, participants were more likely to select hard tasks on the EEfRT. Relative to healthy controls, cannabis users were significantly more likely to select hard tasks on the EEfRT ((1,56) = 6.49, = 0.014, = 0.10). When controlling for alcohol use and depressive symptoms, no significant group differences in self-reported apathy were present ( = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis users exhibit a greater likelihood of exerting more effort for reward, suggesting enhanced motivation relative to healthy controls. Thus, the current results do not support amotivational syndrome in adult frequent cannabis users. Despite some harms of long-term cannabis use, amotivation may not be among them.

摘要

简介

是指与慢性大麻使用相关的缺乏动力和消极人格。鉴于混合研究结果,本研究旨在复制和扩展之前关于频繁大麻使用、动机行为和自我报告的冷漠的研究。

方法

大麻使用者(平均每周至少 3 天使用大麻,过去一年中)和健康对照者(过去一年中每月使用大麻不超过 1 天)完成了冷漠评估量表(AES)和努力付出奖励任务(EEfRT)。重复测量协方差分析用于 1)检查组、奖励大小、概率及其相互作用对 EEfRT 上的困难任务选择的影响,2)控制酒精使用和抑郁症状,检查 AES 上的组间差异。

结果

奖励大小、概率及其相互作用对困难任务选择有显著的主效应( < 0.05)。具体来说,随着奖励大小和赢得奖励的概率增加,参与者更有可能在 EEfRT 上选择困难任务。与健康对照组相比,大麻使用者更有可能在 EEfRT 上选择困难任务((1,56)=6.49, =0.014, =0.10)。控制酒精使用和抑郁症状后,AES 上两组间无显著差异( =0.46)。

结论

大麻使用者表现出更有可能为获得奖励而付出更多努力,这表明他们的动机相对于健康对照组更强。因此,目前的结果不支持成年频繁大麻使用者存在动机缺乏综合征。尽管长期使用大麻存在一些危害,但缺乏动机可能不是其中之一。

相似文献

1
Effort-based decision making and self-reported apathy in frequent cannabis users and healthy controls: A replication and extension.基于努力的决策和自我报告的冷漠在频繁使用大麻者和健康对照组中的表现:一项复制和扩展研究。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2022 Mar;44(2):146-162. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2093335. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
Acute and chronic effects of cannabinoids on effort-related decision-making and reward learning: an evaluation of the cannabis 'amotivational' hypotheses.大麻素对与努力相关的决策和奖励学习的急性和慢性影响:对大麻“无动机”假说的评估。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Oct;233(19-20):3537-52. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4383-x. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
3
Anhedonia, Apathy, Pleasure, and Effort-Based Decision-Making in Adult and Adolescent Cannabis Users and Controls.快感缺失、淡漠、愉悦和基于努力的决策在成年和青少年大麻使用者和对照组中的表现。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Jan 19;26(1):9-19. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyac056.
4
Residual Effects of Cannabis Use on Effort-Based Decision-Making.大麻使用对基于努力的决策的残留效应。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2021 Jul;27(6):559-569. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721000473.
5
Effort-related decision making and cannabis use among college students.与努力相关的决策和大学生中的大麻使用。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Feb;31(1):228-237. doi: 10.1037/pha0000544. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
6
Are effort-based decision-making tasks worth the effort?-A study on the associations between effort-based decision-making tasks and self-report measures.基于努力的决策任务是否值得付出努力?——一项关于基于努力的决策任务与自我报告测量之间关联的研究。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023 Mar;32(1):e1943. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1943. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
7
A Comprehensive Examination of the Links between Cannabis Use and Motivation.对大麻使用与动机之间关系的全面考察。
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(7):1155-1164. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1729203. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
8
Association between cognitive function and performance on effort based decision making in patients with major depressive disorder treated with Vortioxetine.文拉法辛治疗的重性抑郁障碍患者认知功能与基于努力的决策表现之间的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;94:152113. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
The cognitive effort expenditure for rewards task (C-EEfRT): A novel measure of willingness to expend cognitive effort.奖赏认知努力任务(C-EEfRT):一种衡量意愿付出认知努力的新方法。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1237-1248. doi: 10.1037/pas0000563. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
10
Effort expenditure for rewards task modified for food: A novel behavioral measure of willingness to work for food.针对食物修改的奖励任务中的努力支出:一种衡量为获取食物而工作意愿的新行为指标。
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Dec 31. doi: 10.1002/eat.22999.

引用本文的文献

1
Will you precrastinate? Sensitivity to potential performance costs and effort in chronic cannabis users and non-users.你会过早行动吗?慢性大麻使用者和非使用者对潜在绩效成本和努力的敏感性。
Psychol Res. 2025 Aug 4;89(4):129. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02139-8.
2
A Behavioural and neurobiological assessment of effort-based decision-making in cannabis use disorder: An initial/preliminary investigation.大麻使用障碍中基于努力的决策的行为和神经生物学评估:初步调查。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01308-x.
3
Operant effort-based decision-making task reveals sex differences in motivational behavior but no long-term effects of adolescent intermittent ethanol in Sprague Dawley rats.
基于操作性努力的决策任务揭示了斯普拉格-道利大鼠动机行为中的性别差异,但青少年间歇性乙醇处理没有长期影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2025 May;250:173998. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2025.173998. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Substance use disorder severity is associated with sensitivity to effort-related decision-making constraints.物质使用障碍的严重程度与对努力相关决策约束的敏感性有关。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Jun;242(6):1351-1362. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06732-4. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
5
Exaggerated frontoparietal control over cognitive effort-based decision-making in young women with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症年轻女性额顶叶对基于认知努力的决策的过度控制。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;30(3):861-869. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02712-4. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
6
Anhedonia, Apathy, Pleasure, and Effort-Based Decision-Making in Adult and Adolescent Cannabis Users and Controls.快感缺失、淡漠、愉悦和基于努力的决策在成年和青少年大麻使用者和对照组中的表现。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Jan 19;26(1):9-19. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyac056.