• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

敌意收购威胁是否重要?来自信用评级的证据。

Do hostile takeover threats matter? Evidence from credit ratings.

机构信息

Center of Excellence in Management Research for Corporate Governance and Behavioral Finance, SASIN School of Management, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

NIDA Business School, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0260688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260688. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260688
PMID:35089950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8797189/
Abstract

Exploiting a novel measure of takeover vulnerability mainly based on state legislations, we explore the effect of hostile takeover threats on credit ratings. Our results reveal that companies with more takeover exposure are assigned significantly better credit ratings. In particular, a rise in takeover vulnerability by one standard deviation results in an improvement in credit ratings by 7.89%. Our findings are consistent with the view that the disciplinary mechanism associated with the takeover market mitigates agency problems and ultimately raises firm value. Further analysis corroborates our conclusion, including propensity score matching, entropy balancing, and an instrumental-variable analysis. As our proxy for takeover susceptibility is plausibly exogenous, our results are more likely to show a causal effect.

摘要

利用一项主要基于州立法的新型接管脆弱性衡量指标,我们探讨了敌意收购威胁对信用评级的影响。研究结果表明,面临更多接管风险的公司获得的信用评级显著更高。具体而言,接管脆弱性上升一个标准差会导致信用评级提高 7.89%。我们的发现与以下观点一致,即与收购市场相关的约束机制可以减轻代理问题,并最终提高公司价值。进一步的分析支持了我们的结论,包括倾向得分匹配、熵平衡和工具变量分析。由于我们的接管风险代理变量很可能是外生的,因此我们的结果更有可能显示出因果效应。

相似文献

1
Do hostile takeover threats matter? Evidence from credit ratings.敌意收购威胁是否重要?来自信用评级的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0260688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260688. eCollection 2022.
2
Credit ratings a cap casualty.信用评级成为上限牺牲品。
Mich Hosp. 1984 Jan;20(1):29, 31-2.
3
Experts say HMOs' capital needs to be limited to takeover attempts.专家表示,健康维护组织(HMO)的资金应仅限于用于收购尝试。
Mod Healthc. 1987 Mar 13;17(6):154, 156.
4
The structure of the investment tax credit.投资税收抵免的结构。
Hosp Top. 1986 Jul-Aug;64(4):30-2. doi: 10.1080/00185868.1986.9950527.
5
Age, debt and anxiety.年龄、债务与焦虑。
J Health Soc Behav. 2000 Dec;41(4):437-50.
6
Does green credit policy affect corporate debt financing? Evidence from China.绿色信贷政策是否影响企业债务融资?来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(4):5162-5171. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16051-2. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
7
Switching horses midstream.临阵换马。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2007 Oct;61(10):98-100, 102.
8
Does board gender diversity weaken or strengthen executive risk-taking incentives?董事会的性别多元化是削弱还是增强了高管的风险承担激励?
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0258163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258163. eCollection 2021.
9
Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance.促进还是抑制:工作量对驾驶员接管性能的倒U形效应。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(7):482-487. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1804060. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
10
The relationship between sovereign credit rating changes and firm risk.主权信用评级变化与企业风险之间的关系。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 26;9(10):e20444. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20444. eCollection 2023 Oct.