• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定改善北卡罗来纳州有复杂健康需求的儿童护理系统的优先事项:系统利益相关者参与的过程和结果。

Identifying Priorities to Improve the System of Care for Children With Complex Health Needs in North Carolina: Process and Outcomes of Systematic Stakeholder Engagement.

机构信息

Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy (S Sandhu), Durham, NC; Harvard Medical School (S Sandhu), Boston, Mass.

Departments of Pediatrics, Medicine, and Population Health Sciences (DY Ming), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2022 Aug;22(6):1041-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2022.01.011
PMID:35091096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9314463/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Children with complex health needs (CCHN) have both medical (eg, chronic conditions) and health-related social needs (eg, potentially adverse social determinants of health) that require ongoing health care and support from multiple community service providers. National standards developed for populations defined by health needs (CYSHCN) provide a framework for stakeholders to plan system-level improvements in care delivery for CCHN, but improvement efforts should reflect the priorities of their families and providers. This article describes a process of prioritizing system-level efforts to improve the health and well-being of CCHN and families in North Carolina (NC), using systematic stakeholder engagement and modified Delphi expert ratings.

METHODS

We surveyed stakeholders with experience caring for CCHN using an open-ended, 3-item instrument to identify opportunities to improve systems of care. Using directed qualitative content analysis, we synthesized responses into a master list of potential improvement topics. Using a modified Delphi approach, a 16-member advisory committee rated all topics for importance and urgency, on 9-point Likert scales over 2 rounds; then ratings for each topic were ranked (low, medium, high) to establish relative priority.

RESULTS

Forty seven individuals from 31 counties around NC provided survey responses, yielding 59 improvement topics in 10 domains. Through the modified Delphi method process, 21 topics (36%) received the highest rankings, largely representing access to community- and home-based services, equity, and enhancement of the pediatric workforce.

CONCLUSIONS

Priorities identified by stakeholders will inform advocacy, policy, and improvement efforts. Next steps for the coalition include developing improvement projects to implement stakeholder-recommended actions for the highest-priority topics.

摘要

目的

患有复杂健康需求的儿童(CCHN)既有医疗需求(例如慢性疾病),也有与健康相关的社会需求(例如潜在的健康决定因素不利),这些需求需要持续的医疗保健和来自多个社区服务提供者的支持。为满足健康需求的人群(CYSHCN)制定的国家标准为利益相关者提供了一个框架,用于规划 CCHN 护理服务提供方面的系统级改进,但改进工作应反映其家庭和提供者的优先事项。本文描述了北卡罗来纳州(NC)使用系统的利益相关者参与和修改后的 Delphi 专家评分来确定优先考虑系统级努力以改善 CCHN 和家庭健康和福祉的过程。

方法

我们使用开放式、3 项的工具对有照顾 CCHN 经验的利益相关者进行了调查,以确定改善护理系统的机会。使用定向定性内容分析,我们将回应综合成潜在改进主题的总清单。使用修改后的 Delphi 方法,一个由 16 名成员组成的顾问委员会对所有主题的重要性和紧迫性进行了 9 点李克特量表的两轮评分;然后对每个主题的评分进行排名(低、中、高),以确定相对优先级。

结果

北卡罗来纳州 31 个县的 47 人提供了调查答复,产生了 10 个领域的 59 个改进主题。通过修改后的 Delphi 方法过程,21 个主题(36%)获得了最高排名,主要代表了获得社区和家庭服务、公平和增强儿科劳动力的机会。

结论

利益相关者确定的优先事项将为宣传、政策和改进工作提供信息。联盟的下一步行动包括制定改进项目,以实施利益相关者推荐的针对最高优先级主题的行动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/9314463/3b75a3bbae34/nihms-1783028-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/9314463/d86cd4c88067/nihms-1783028-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/9314463/3b75a3bbae34/nihms-1783028-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/9314463/d86cd4c88067/nihms-1783028-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/9314463/3b75a3bbae34/nihms-1783028-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Priorities to Improve the System of Care for Children With Complex Health Needs in North Carolina: Process and Outcomes of Systematic Stakeholder Engagement.确定改善北卡罗来纳州有复杂健康需求的儿童护理系统的优先事项:系统利益相关者参与的过程和结果。
Acad Pediatr. 2022 Aug;22(6):1041-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
2
Health System Research Priorities for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs.儿童和青少年特殊健康需求的卫生系统研究重点。
Pediatrics. 2020 Mar;145(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0673. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
3
Catalyzing Cross-Sector Collaboration: Lessons from a Virtual Pediatric Complex Care Coalition.催化跨部门合作:虚拟儿科综合护理联盟的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(2):295-305. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.a900210.
4
Prioritising models of healthcare service delivery for a more sustainable health system: a Delphi study of Australian health policy, clinical practice and management, academic and consumer stakeholders.优先考虑医疗服务提供模式,以建立更具可持续性的卫生系统:对澳大利亚卫生政策、临床实践和管理、学术和消费者利益相关者的德尔菲研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):425-432. doi: 10.1071/AH20160.
5
Prioritizing Possibilities for Child and Family Health: An Agenda to Address Adverse Childhood Experiences and Foster the Social and Emotional Roots of Well-being in Pediatrics.优先考虑儿童和家庭健康的可能性:解决不良儿童经历问题并促进儿科学中幸福感的社会和情感根源的议程。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S36-S50. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.06.002.
6
Identifying and prioritising systematic review topics with public health stakeholders: A protocol for a modified Delphi study in Switzerland to inform future research agendas.确定和优先考虑具有公共卫生利益相关者的系统评价主题:瑞士一项改良德尔菲研究的方案,为未来的研究议程提供信息。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e015500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015500.
7
Supportive mobility devices across the lifespan in Cerebral Palsy: a modified Delphi study to establish stakeholder research priorities.脑瘫患者全生命周期的支持性移动设备:一项用于确定利益相关者研究重点的改良德尔菲研究
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 May;19(4):1739-1747. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2233564. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
8
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
9
Identification and Prioritization of Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Topics With Multidisciplinary Stakeholders and People Living With Kidney Disease: A Clinical Research Protocol.通过多学科利益相关者和肾病患者确定加拿大肾脏病学会临床实践指南主题并确定优先顺序:一项临床研究方案。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Nov 24;10:20543581231207142. doi: 10.1177/20543581231207142. eCollection 2023.
10
Setting a research agenda for vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome using a patient and stakeholder engagement model.制定血管型埃勒斯-当洛斯综合征研究议程,采用患者和利益相关者参与模式。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1436-1444.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.043. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregiving Across the Life Course: A Health Policy Priority for North Carolina.贯穿一生的照护:北卡罗来纳州的一项卫生政策重点
N C Med J. 2023 Mar;84(2):114-118. doi: 10.18043/001c.73015.
2
Predictive Modeling to Identify Children With Complex Health Needs At Risk for Hospitalization.预测建模识别有住院风险的复杂健康需求儿童。
Hosp Pediatr. 2023 May 1;13(5):357-369. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006861.