Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍中的情绪调节困难:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Difficulties in emotion regulation in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padua, Italy;; Padua Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

Department of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 1;302:352-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.102. Epub 2022 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe mental disorder characterized by mood swings and functional impairment. Although alterations in emotional regulation (ER) are a key feature, a comprehensive meta-analysis on abnormalities in emotion regulation in BD is still lacking.

METHODS

We performed a random-effects meta-analysis on studies comparing the ER measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) in BD and healthy controls (HC) or borderline personality disorder (BPD) and calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) of the total DERS score between those with BD and HC (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes were the SMD of the DERS subscales between BD and HC, as well as the SMD of the total score of DERS and the subscales between BD and BPD.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (858 BD, 540 BPD, 285 HC) were included. Compared to HC, BD showed significantly higher total DERS score (k=8, SMD 0.962, p<0.001) and subscale scores, including non-acceptance (k=6, SMD=0.85, p<0.001), goal-directed behavior (k=6, SMD=0.894, p<0.001), impulse control (k=6, SMD=1.08, p<0.001), strategies (k=6, SMD=1.25, p<0.001) and emotional clarity (k=6, SMD=0.694, p=0.001). Relative to BPD, BD presented significantly lower scores in all the DERS subscales. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the main analyses. The age of the participants and sample size moderated the primary outcome.

LIMITATIONS

The small number of studies and the cross-sectional design limit the generalizability of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that alterations of specific ER abilities are present in BD and their magnitude is smaller relative to BPD. Future therapeutic interventions should target ER strategies.

摘要

背景

双相情感障碍(BD)是一种严重的精神障碍,其特征为情绪波动和功能损害。尽管情绪调节(ER)的改变是一个关键特征,但目前仍缺乏关于 BD 中情绪调节异常的综合荟萃分析。

方法

我们对比较 BD 患者和健康对照者(HC)或边缘型人格障碍(BPD)者使用情绪调节困难量表(DERS)测量的 ER 的研究进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并计算了 BD 患者和 HC 之间 DERS 总分的标准化均数差(SMD)(主要结局)。次要结局为 BD 患者和 HC 之间 DERS 分量表的 SMD,以及 DERS 总分和分量表在 BD 和 BPD 之间的 SMD。

结果

纳入了 12 项研究(858 例 BD、540 例 BPD、285 例 HC)。与 HC 相比,BD 患者的 DERS 总分(k=8,SMD 0.962,p<0.001)和分量表评分显著更高,包括非接受性(k=6,SMD=0.85,p<0.001)、目标导向行为(k=6,SMD=0.894,p<0.001)、冲动控制(k=6,SMD=1.08,p<0.001)、策略(k=6,SMD=1.25,p<0.001)和情绪清晰度(k=6,SMD=0.694,p=0.001)。与 BPD 相比,BD 患者在所有 DERS 分量表上的得分均显著更低。敏感性分析证实了主要分析的结果。参与者的年龄和样本量调节了主要结局。

局限性

研究数量较少和横断面设计限制了结果的普遍性。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,BD 存在特定 ER 能力的改变,其程度相对于 BPD 较小。未来的治疗干预应针对 ER 策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验