Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Hippocratespad 21, 2333 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
National eHealth Living Lab (NeLL), Leiden, the Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 30;22(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07316-0.
Implementation of digital health (eHealth) generally involves adapting pre-established and carefully considered processes or routines, and still raises multiple ethical and legal dilemmas. This study aimed to identify challenges regarding responsibility and liability when prescribing digital health in clinical practice. This was part of an overarching project aiming to explore the most pressing ethical and legal obstacles regarding the implementation and adoption of digital health in the Netherlands, and to propose actionable solutions.
A series of multidisciplinary focus groups with stakeholders who have relevant digital health expertise were analysed through thematic analysis.
The emerging general theme was 'uncertainty regarding responsibilities' when adopting digital health. Key dilemmas take place in clinical settings and within the doctor-patient relationship ('professional digital health'). This context is particularly challenging because different stakeholders interact. In the absence of appropriate legal frameworks and codes of conduct tailored to digital health, physicians' responsibility is to be found in their general duty of care. In other words: to do what is best for patients (not causing harm and doing good). Professional organisations could take a leading role to provide more clarity with respect to physicians' responsibility, by developing guidance describing physicians' duty of care in the context of digital health, and to address the resulting responsibilities.
Although legal frameworks governing medical practice describe core ethical principles, rights and obligations of physicians, they do not suffice to clarify their responsibilities in the setting of professional digital health. Here we present a series of recommendations to provide more clarity in this respect, offering the opportunity to improve quality of care and patients' health. The recommendations can be used as a starting point to develop professional guidance and have the potential to be adapted to other healthcare professionals and systems.
数字健康(eHealth)的实施通常需要调整预先制定并经过深思熟虑的流程或常规,并且仍然引发了许多伦理和法律困境。本研究旨在确定在临床实践中开具数字健康处方时的责任和赔偿问题。这是一个总体项目的一部分,该项目旨在探索在荷兰实施和采用数字健康技术方面最紧迫的伦理和法律障碍,并提出可行的解决方案。
通过主题分析对具有相关数字健康专业知识的利益相关者进行了一系列多学科焦点小组的分析。
出现的总体主题是采用数字健康时的“责任不确定性”。主要的困境发生在临床环境和医患关系中(“专业数字健康”)。由于不同的利益相关者相互作用,这种情况特别具有挑战性。在没有适当的法律框架和针对数字健康的行为准则的情况下,医生的责任在于他们的一般护理责任。换句话说:为患者做最好的事情(不造成伤害并做好事)。专业组织可以通过制定描述医生在数字健康背景下的护理责任的指导方针,并解决由此产生的责任,在为医生的责任提供更多明确性方面发挥主导作用。
尽管管理医疗实践的法律框架描述了医生的核心伦理原则、权利和义务,但它们不足以明确其在专业数字健康环境中的责任。在这里,我们提出了一系列建议,以在这方面提供更多的明确性,从而有机会提高护理质量和患者的健康。这些建议可作为制定专业指南的起点,并有可能适应其他医疗保健专业人员和系统。