• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚拟办公室干预效果:系统方法。

Virtual office intervention effectiveness: A systems approach.

机构信息

Office Ergonomics Research Committee (OERC), Boston, MA, USA.

Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.

出版信息

Work. 2022;71(2):451-464. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210698.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-210698
PMID:35095005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Virtual office work, or telework/remote work, has existed since the 1970s due to the widespread availability of new technologies. Despite a dramatic increase in remote office work, few studies have examined its long-term effects on work environments and worker well-being.

OBJECTIVE

A prospective field intervention study was undertaken to examine the effects of a Virtual Office program on office workers' psychosocial perceptions, mental and physical well-being, workplace satisfaction, and performance.

METHOD

A large public service organization undertook a 12-month Virtual Office (VO) pilot program using a systems approach. The study included 137 VO employees (intervention condition), and 85 Conventional Office (CO) employees (control condition). The VO intervention used a work system approach consisting of establishing a steering committee, training programs, and VO resource website. Employee survey measures and follow-up focus group observations were used to examine the impact of the VO intervention.

RESULTS

Virtual office participants reported higher job control, group interactions and cohesiveness, and quality of supervision than the CO participants. VO participants reported lower upper body musculoskeletal symptoms and physical/mental stress than CO participants. VO participants reported higher performance (customer satisfaction) than the CO participants.

CONCLUSION

The study findings were sufficiently positive to provide a basis for work organizations to undertake similar pilot programs. Consideration of work system factors when designing an effective VO program can benefit employee's well-being and performance. The rationale for implementing VO programs is underscored by the current COVID-19 pandemic. VO work will continue to some degree for the foreseeable future.

摘要

背景

由于新技术的广泛应用,虚拟办公,或远程办公,自 20 世纪 70 年代以来就已经存在。尽管远程办公有了显著的增加,但很少有研究考察其对工作环境和员工福祉的长期影响。

目的

一项前瞻性实地干预研究旨在考察虚拟办公室计划对办公室工作人员的社会心理认知、身心健康、工作场所满意度和绩效的影响。

方法

一家大型公共服务组织采用系统方法进行了为期 12 个月的虚拟办公室(VO)试点计划。该研究包括 137 名虚拟办公室(VO)员工(干预组)和 85 名传统办公室(CO)员工(对照组)。VO 干预采用了工作系统方法,包括成立指导委员会、培训计划和 VO 资源网站。使用员工调查措施和后续焦点小组观察来考察 VO 干预的影响。

结果

虚拟办公室参与者报告的工作控制、群体互动和凝聚力以及监督质量高于传统办公室参与者。虚拟办公室参与者报告的上半身肌肉骨骼症状和身体/精神压力低于传统办公室参与者。虚拟办公室参与者报告的绩效(客户满意度)高于传统办公室参与者。

结论

研究结果非常积极,为工作组织开展类似试点计划提供了依据。在设计有效的 VO 计划时考虑工作系统因素可以使员工的福祉和绩效受益。当前 COVID-19 大流行强调了实施 VO 计划的理由。在可预见的未来,虚拟办公将在一定程度上继续存在。

相似文献

1
Virtual office intervention effectiveness: A systems approach.虚拟办公室干预效果:系统方法。
Work. 2022;71(2):451-464. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210698.
2
Does working style affect the occupational balance and life satisfaction of office workers in Turkey? A comparison study.工作方式是否会影响土耳其上班族的职业平衡和生活满意度?一项对比研究。
Work. 2024;78(2):393-398. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230078.
3
Making daily decisions to work from home or to work in the office: The impacts of daily work- and COVID-related stressors on next-day work location.每天决定在家工作还是在办公室工作:日常工作和与 COVID 相关压力源对次日工作地点的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Jun;106(6):825-838. doi: 10.1037/apl0000929.
4
Work Performance, Mood and Sleep Alterations in Home Office Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间居家办公者的工作表现、情绪和睡眠变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4):1990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041990.
5
Challenges for Workplace Risk Assessment in Home Offices-Results from a Qualitative Descriptive Study on Working Life during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Latvia.居家办公环境下工作场所风险评估面临的挑战——拉脱维亚新冠疫情第一波期间工作生活定性描述性研究的结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 16;18(20):10876. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010876.
6
Telework Before Illness Onset Among Symptomatic Adults Aged ≥18 Years With and Without COVID-19 in 11 Outpatient Health Care Facilities - United States, July 2020.11 家门诊医疗机构中≥18 岁有症状的 COVID-19 或无 COVID-19 成人出现症状前的远程工作情况 - 美国,2020 年 7 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 6;69(44):1648-1653. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6944a4.
7
The role of work stress, organizational climate, and improving employee performance in the implementation of work from home.工作压力、组织氛围以及提高员工绩效在实施居家办公中的作用。
Work. 2022;71(2):345-355. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210678.
8
Home Office, Health Behavior and Workplace Health Promotion of Employees in the Telecommunications Sector during the Pandemic.家庭办公、大流行期间电信部门员工的健康行为和工作场所健康促进。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 10;19(18):11424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811424.
9
Ergonomic lighting considerations for the home office workplace.家庭办公工作场所的人体工程学照明考虑因素。
Work. 2022;71(2):335-343. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210704.
10
A systematic review of working conditions and occupational health in home office.居家办公工作条件与职业健康的系统综述
Work. 2022;72(3):839-852. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205239.

引用本文的文献

1
Work Disability and Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Teleworkers: A Scoping Review.远程工作者的工作残疾与肌肉骨骼疾病:一项范围综述
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Mar;35(1):17-29. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10184-0. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
2
To be or not to be stressed: Designing autonomy to reduce stress at work.是有压力还是没有压力:设计自主性以减少工作压力。
Work. 2023;75(4):1199-1213. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220177.