Martin Sarah-Maude, Lalonde François, Legault Élise, Ribeiro Paula, Comtois Alain Steve, Tournoux François
Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM), Montreal, Quebec, CANADA.
University of Montreal Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, CANADA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Dec 1;14(2):1354-1362. doi: 10.70252/KBNF6433. eCollection 2021.
Cycles of ischemia and reperfusion induced with a pressure cuff on a skeletal muscle, also know as remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), appears to improve performance in different time-trial events in healthy individuals. Our primary goal was to assess the effect of RIPC in heart failure (HF) patients' functional capacity using the six-minute walk test (6MWT). A randomized crossover design comparing RIPC (4 × five-minutes of upper arm ischemia) to the SHAM procedure was done in 15 patients prior to a 6MWT. The primary outcome measure was the total distance walked in a standardized 6MWT (20m corridor). Metabolic and hemodynamic responses were measured using gas exchange analysis with a portable metabolic analyzer and peripheral skeletal muscle oxygen saturation (smO) with near-infrared spectroscopy. The total distance travelled during 6MWT was not significantly different between the RIPC (347 ± 63 m) and the SHAM procedure (352 ± 65 m; = 0.514). Relative oxygen uptake did not change when comparing interventions: 10.26 ± 2.01 ml/kg/min vs 10.69 ± 2.51 ml/kg/min (RIPC vs SHAM, respectively, = 0.278). As well, no significant differences were observed for heart rate, respiratory exchange ratio, smO, and ventilation. Even though HF patients tolerated well the RIPC intervention, it did not provide any significant improvement in functional capacity and other physiological parameters in our sample of patients.
用压力袖带在骨骼肌上诱导的缺血再灌注循环,也称为远程缺血预处理(RIPC),似乎能改善健康个体在不同计时赛项目中的表现。我们的主要目标是使用六分钟步行试验(6MWT)评估RIPC对心力衰竭(HF)患者功能能力的影响。在15名患者进行6MWT之前,采用随机交叉设计,将RIPC(上臂缺血4次,每次5分钟)与假手术进行比较。主要结局指标是在标准化6MWT(20米走廊)中行走的总距离。使用便携式代谢分析仪通过气体交换分析以及用近红外光谱法测量外周骨骼肌氧饱和度(smO)来测量代谢和血流动力学反应。RIPC组(347±63米)和假手术组(352±65米;P = 0.514)在6MWT期间行走的总距离没有显著差异。比较不同干预措施时,相对摄氧量没有变化:分别为10.26±2.01毫升/千克/分钟和10.69±2.51毫升/千克/分钟(RIPC组与假手术组,P = 0.278)。同样,在心率、呼吸交换率、smO和通气方面未观察到显著差异。尽管HF患者对RIPC干预耐受性良好,但在我们的患者样本中,它并未在功能能力和其他生理参数方面带来任何显著改善。