Woeste Matthew R, Wilson Khaleel D, Kruse Edward J, Weiss Matthew J, Christein John D, White Rebekah R, Martin Robert C G
Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, United States.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 13;11:817220. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.817220. eCollection 2021.
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) has emerged as a viable consolidative therapy after induction chemotherapy, in which this combination has improved overall survival of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Optimal timing and patient selection for irreversible electroporation remains a clinically unmet need. The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative factors that may assist in predicting progression-free and overall survival following IRE.
A multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with LAPC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by open-technique irreversible electroporation from 7/2015-5/2019. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess tumor response and radiological progression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier and Cox multivariable regression analyses.
187 LAPC patients (median age 62 years range, 21 - 91, 65% men, 35% women) were treated with IRE. Median PFS was 21.7 months and median OS from diagnosis was 25.5 months. On multivariable analysis, age ≤ 61 (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.78, p<0.008) and no prior radiation (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.26-0.94, p=0.03) were positive predictors of OS after IRE. Age ≤ 61(HR 0.53, 95%CI, 0.28-.99, p=0.046) and FOLFIRINOX followed by gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy (HR 0.37,95%CI 0.15-0.89, p=0.027) predicted prolonged PFS after IRE. Abnormal CA19-9 values at the time of surgery negatively impacted both OS (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.28-4.72, p<0.007) and PFS (HR 2.192, 95%CI 1.143-4.201, p=0.018) following IRE.
Age, CA 19-9 response, avoidance of pre-IRE radiation, and FOLFIRINOX plus gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy are prominent factors to consider when referring or selecting LAPC patients to undergo IRE.
不可逆电穿孔(IRE)已成为诱导化疗后一种可行的巩固治疗方法,这种联合治疗提高了局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的总生存率。不可逆电穿孔的最佳时机和患者选择仍然是临床上未满足的需求。本研究的目的是调查可能有助于预测IRE后无进展生存期和总生存期的术前因素。
回顾了一个多机构前瞻性维护的数据库,该数据库纳入了2015年7月至2019年5月接受诱导化疗后行开放技术不可逆电穿孔治疗的LAPC患者。采用RECIST 1.1标准评估肿瘤反应和影像学进展。记录总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。使用Kaplan Meier和Cox多变量回归分析进行生存分析。
187例LAPC患者(中位年龄62岁,范围21 - 91岁,65%为男性,35%为女性)接受了IRE治疗。中位PFS为21.7个月,自诊断起的中位OS为25.5个月。多变量分析显示,年龄≤61岁(HR 0.41,95%CI 0.21 - 0.78,p<0.008)和未接受过放疗(HR 0.49,95%CI 0.26 - 0.94,p = 0.03)是IRE后OS的阳性预测因素。年龄≤61岁(HR 0.53,95%CI 0.28 - 0.99,p = 0.046)以及先接受FOLFIRINOX方案然后吉西他滨/白蛋白结合型紫杉醇诱导化疗(HR 0.37,95%CI 0.15 - 0.89,p = 0.027)预测IRE后PFS延长。手术时CA19-9值异常对IRE后的OS(HR 2.46,95%CI 1.28 - 4.72,p<0.007)和PFS(HR 2.192,95%CI 1.143 - 4.201,p = 0.018)均有负面影响。
在推荐或选择LAPC患者接受IRE治疗时,年龄、CA19-9反应、避免IRE前放疗以及FOLFIRINOX联合吉西他滨/白蛋白结合型紫杉醇诱导化疗是需要考虑的重要因素。