36513University for Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Aug;29(5):1186-1197. doi: 10.1177/09697330211051000. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
has published several pleas for care ethics and/or relationality as the most promising ethical foundation for midwifery philosophy and practice. In this article, we stand by these calls, contributing to them with the identification of the structural form of violence that a care ethical relational approach to reproductive care is up against: that of "maternal separation". Confronted with reproductive and obstetric violence globally, we show that a hegemonic racialized, instrumentalized, and individualized conception of pregnancy is responsible for a severance of relationalities that are essential to safe reproductive care: (1) the relation between the person and their child or reproductive capabilities; and (2) the relation between the pregnant person and their community of care. We pinpoint a separation of the maternal relation in at least two discursive domains, namely, the juridical-political and the ethical-existential. Consequently, we plea for a radical re-imagination of maternal relationality, envisioning what care ethical midwifery, including abortion care, could be.
她发表了多篇呼吁，倡导关怀伦理和/或关系性，认为它们是助产实践和哲学最有前途的伦理基础。在本文中，我们支持这些呼吁，并通过识别生殖护理中关怀伦理关系方法所面临的结构性暴力形式来为此做出贡献：即“母婴分离”。面对全球范围内的生殖和产科暴力，我们表明，一种占主导地位的、种族主义的、工具化的、个体化的怀孕观念导致了与安全生殖护理至关重要的关系的破裂：（1）人与他们的孩子或生殖能力之间的关系；以及（2）孕妇与其关护社区之间的关系。我们在至少两个话语领域确定了母性关系的分离，即法律-政治领域和伦理-存在领域。因此，我们呼吁彻底重新想象母性关系，设想关怀伦理助产，包括堕胎护理，可以是什么样子。
