• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越自主:助产伦理与生育的人性化

Beyond autonomy: Care ethics for midwifery and the humanization of birth.

机构信息

Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

Sheffield Hallam University, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):2147-2157. doi: 10.1177/0969733018819119. Epub 2019 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1177/0969733018819119
PMID:30638112
Abstract

The bioethical principle of respect for a person's bodily autonomy is central to biomedical and healthcare ethics. In this article, we argue that this concept of autonomy is often annulled in the maternity field, due to the maternal two-in-one body (and the obstetric focus on the foetus over the woman) and the history of medical paternalism in Western medicine and obstetrics. The principle of respect for autonomy has therefore become largely rhetorical, yet can hide all manner of unethical practice. We propose that large institutions that prioritize a midwife-institution relationship over a midwife-woman relationship are in themselves unethical and inimical to the midwifery philosophy of care. We suggest that a focus on care ethics has the potential to remedy these problems, by making power relationships visible and by prioritizing the relationship above abstract ethical principles.

摘要

尊重个人身体自主权是生物医学和医疗保健伦理学的核心原则。本文认为,由于母体的双重身体(以及产科关注胎儿而不是女性)以及西方医学和产科的医学家长主义历史,这种自主权概念在产科领域经常被否定。因此,尊重自主权原则在很大程度上已经成为一种空洞的言辞,而这可能掩盖了各种不道德的行为。我们认为,优先考虑助产士-机构关系而不是助产士-妇女关系的大型机构本身就是不道德的,并且不利于助产护理伦理哲学。我们建议,关注关怀伦理有潜力通过使权力关系可见并优先考虑关系而不是抽象的伦理原则来解决这些问题。

相似文献

1
Beyond autonomy: Care ethics for midwifery and the humanization of birth.超越自主:助产伦理与生育的人性化
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):2147-2157. doi: 10.1177/0969733018819119. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
2
The place of autonomy in bioethics.自主权在生物伦理学中的地位。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Jan-Feb;20(1):12-7.
3
Self-determination vs. family-determination: two incommensurable principles of autonomy: a report from East Asia.自我决定与家庭决定:自主性的两个不可通约原则:一份来自东亚的报告。
Bioethics. 1997 Jul-Oct;11(3-4):309-22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00070.
4
Does midwifery-led care demonstrate care ethics: A template analysis.导乐助产模式是否体现关怀伦理:模板分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Feb;29(1):245-257. doi: 10.1177/09697330211008638. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
5
The advancement of a gender ethics protocol to uncover gender ethical dilemmas in midwifery: a preliminary theory model.推进性别伦理协议以揭示助产领域的性别伦理困境:一个初步的理论模型。
Reprod Health. 2022 Nov 19;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01515-6.
6
Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent.知情同意中的关系自主性(RAIC)作为一种对知情同意概念的关怀伦理方法。
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Mar;21(1):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9789-7.
7
Philosophical foundations of respect for autonomy.尊重自主性的哲学基础。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Mar;3(1):21-37. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0103.
8
Prescriptions: autonomy, humanism and the purpose of health technology.处方:自主性、人文主义与健康技术的目的。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1998 Dec;19(6):525-45. doi: 10.1023/a:1009999909072.
9
A theory of international bioethics: multiculturalism, postmodernism, and the bankruptcy of fundamentalism.一种国际生物伦理学理论:多元文化主义、后现代主义与原教旨主义的破产
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Sep;8(3):201-31. doi: 10.1353/ken.1998.0017.
10
Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians.预防孕妇与其医生之间伦理冲突的临床指南。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb;162(2):303-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90374-g.

引用本文的文献

1
Midwifery care attachments: shaping childbirth agency through care techniques.助产护理关系:通过护理技术塑造分娩自主性
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Jun 23;6:1605546. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1605546. eCollection 2025.
2
Barriers to informed consent in obstetric care during childbirth from practitioner's perspective: a qualitative study.从从业者角度看分娩期产科护理中知情同意的障碍:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e101591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101591.
3
The heart of palliative care is relational: a scoping review of the ethics of care in palliative medicine.
姑息治疗的核心是关系性的:姑息医学中关怀伦理的范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 26;24(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01784-5.
4
Navigating Quality and Innovation: Actor-Network Theory and Hybrid Assemblages in Midwifery Practice, Implications of Maternity Early Warning Tools and Artificial Intelligence.驾驭质量与创新:助产实践中的行动者网络理论与混合组合、产妇早期预警工具及人工智能的影响
Nurs Inq. 2025 Apr;32(2):e70001. doi: 10.1111/nin.70001.
5
Observance of ethical codes of midwifery profession in students and graduates of department of midwifery and reproductive health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.伊朗伊斯法罕医科大学助产与生殖健康系学生及毕业生对助产专业道德规范的遵守情况。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Nov 29;13:434. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1069_23. eCollection 2024.
6
Ethics round table: choice and autonomy in obstetrics.伦理圆桌会议:产科中的选择与自主权
J Med Ethics. 2025 Aug 20;51(9):588-592. doi: 10.1136/jme-2024-110503.
7
Experience of decision-making for home breech birth: An interpretive description.臀位在家分娩的决策经验:一项诠释性描述
SSM Qual Res Health. 2024 Jun;5:100397. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100397. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
8
Achievements and Challenges in the Development of a Nurse-Led Respectful Delivery Care Model Provided by Partners in Health in Rural Mexico.墨西哥农村地区健康伙伴组织开展的由护士主导的尊重分娩护理模式的发展成果与挑战
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jan-Feb;42(1):435-443. doi: 10.1111/phn.13443. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
9
Hope pluralism in antenatal palliative care.产前姑息治疗中的希望多元化。
J Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 23;51(8):521-525. doi: 10.1136/jme-2024-110120.
10
Improving birth experiences and provider interactions: Expert opinion on critical links in Maternity care.改善分娩体验与医护人员互动:关于产科护理关键环节的专家意见
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Sep 9;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/191742. eCollection 2024.